Emilio Nava and Ethan Quinn will play each other in the 2nd round of the Charlottesville Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:00 pm on COURT 9. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Nava who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Nava is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Nava -> 1.44
Ethan Quinn -> 2.64
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emilio Nava vs. Ethan Quinn
This will be the 2nd time that Emilio Nava and Ethan Quinn play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Nava (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Nava won 6-1 6-2 in the 1st round in the Stanford Challenger back in August 2023.
Emilio Nava
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-20 | 11-8 | 4-6 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 148, the American got to the 2nd round after beating Bernard Tomic 2-6 7-61 7-5.
In the 1st round against Tomic, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-61 7-5).During the match, Nava scored less points (7) than Tomic. In fact, the world no. 148 won 92 points vs Tomic’s. That means that Nava was more focused during the important points. Nava was very aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nava bagged 12 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Emilio Nava lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Nava put 57% of his first serves in, winning 74% (45/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (23/46) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Tomic twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Nava has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 61% of his matches (150-97). 1-6 on indoor hard courts in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Nava has an overall17-15 match record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Modena Challenger where he beat Titouan Droguet in the final 6-7(5) 7-6(6) 6-4.
Emilio has an overall 37-28 win-loss record in 2023, 1-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Ethan Quinn
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-20 | 11-9 | 2-7 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 458, the American got to the 2nd round after beating James Hopper 6-0 6-3, Dylan Dietrich 7-61 6-3 and Mitchell Krueger 3-6 7-62 6-4.
In the 1st round against Krueger, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-62 6-4). During the match Quinn scored 97 points vs Krueger’s 91. The American was quite aggressive to blast 44 winners.
About the serving games, Quinn recorded 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Ethan Quinn lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Quinn put 55% of his first serves in, winning 80% (44/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (22/45) on the 2nd serve. Quinn broke Krueger 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
The American’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Wichita.
Ethan has a composed 16-13 win-loss record in 2023, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nava | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 69 |
| Pts | 92-99 | 238-182 |
| Total Points | 191 | 420 |
| Winners | 45 | 102 |
| %Winners | 49% | 43% |
Nava played 1 match while Quinn competed in 3 matches. Quinn started his run from the qualifications while Nava had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Emilio Nava surrendered 1 set, while Ethan Quinn surrendered 1 set. Nava has played 4 set(s) less than Quinn (3 vs 7). Therefore, Nava played 36 games less than Quinn. Nava scored 45 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Quinn bagged 102 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nava | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 5.7 |
| 1st in | 61/107 | 122/199 |
| %1st in | 57% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 45/61 | 102/122 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 23/46 | 37/77 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 48% |
Nava made 12 aces . Quinn blasted 17 aces (5.7 per match). Nava won 74% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Quinn won 84% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nava | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 11 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 11/20 |
| % Converted | 50% | 55% |
| Conceded | 7 | 9 |
| Saved | 4 | 5 |
| % Saved | 57% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Emilio broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. The American dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded. Quinn broke his opponents 11 times with a 55% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nava | |||
| R1 Tomic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 7-61 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 92-99 | 92-99 | |
| Total points | 191 | 191 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 61/107 | 61/107 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 45/61 | 45/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/46 | 23/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Quinn | |||||
| Q1 Hopper |
Q3 Dietrich |
R1 Krueger |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-3 | 7-61 6-3 | 3-6 7-62 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 22 | 32 | 69 | |
| pts | 61-33 | 80-58 | 97-91 | 238-182 | |
| Total points | 94 | 138 | 188 | 420 | |
| Winners | 24 | 34 | 44 | 102 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 43% | 45% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 7 | 7 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 30/37 | 37/62 | 55/100 | 122/199 | |
| % 1st in | 81% | 60% | 55% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 24/30 | 34/37 | 44/55 | 102/122 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 92% | 80% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 4/7 | 11/25 | 22/45 | 37/77 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 44% | 49% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 3 | 11 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 3/6 | 3/4 | 11/20 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | 75% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/3 | 3/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | – | 67% | 50% | 117% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLWLLLW
LWLWWWLWWW Tennis Scores in Charlottesville Challenger
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Martin DammDamm (7-65 3-6 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Brandon HoltHolt – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Denis KudlaKudla (6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Benoit PairePaire – Lucas GerchGerch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Brandon HoltHolt (0-1) – H2H and prediction
