Tommy Paul and Botic Van De Zandschulp will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Rolex Paris Masters for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tommy Paul who should win in 3 sets.
Tommy Paul -> 1.47
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 2.69
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tommy Paul vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp
This will be the 2nd time that Tommy Paul and Botic Van De Zandschulp square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Van De Zandschulp (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Van De Zandschulp won 7-6(2) 6-2 in the Rubber 1 in Davis Cup, Group D, Split back in September 2023.
Tommy Paul
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-13 | 13-6 | 12-4 | 3-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 45-20 | 17-12 | 10-4 | 8-2 | 10-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 29-13 | 5-6 | 3-5 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-27 | 21-12 | 2-6 | 9-5 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 33-23 | 12-12 | 9-7 | 12-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 12 (career-high), Tommy got to the 2nd round after beating Richard Gasquet 0-6 6-2 7-66.
In the 1st round against Gasquet, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (0-6 6-2 7-66).During the match, Paul scored less points (2) than Gasquet. In fact, the world no. 12 won 82 points vs Gasquet’s. That means that Paul was more focused during the important points. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Paul recorded 12 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Tommy Paul lost the serve 5 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Paul put 61% of his first serves in, winning 77% (36/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 33% (10/30) on the 2nd serve. Tommy broke Gasquet 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Paul has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 63% of his matches (350-204). 3-4 on indoor hard courts in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Paul has an aggregate53-34 match record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
Paul’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in Acapulco,the Aix En Provence Challenger and Eastbourne.
Paul has an aggregate 46-28 win-loss record in 2023, 3-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Paris
Botic Van De Zandschulp
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-32 | 13-11 | 11-10 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 60, Botic got to the 2nd round after defeating Pedro Cachin 6-2 6-4, Sebastian Ofner 7-67 6-2 and Adrian Mannarino 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round, Botic had a good straight sets win against Mannarino (6-4 7-5). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 78 points vs Mannarino’s 67. The Dutch was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Van De Zandschulp blasted 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 63% of his first serves in, winning 64% (30/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (17/28) on the 2nd serve. Botic broke Mannarino 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Van De Zandschulp’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in Munich.
Botic has an aggregate 25-23 win-loss record in 2023, 10-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Paris
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Paul | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 61 |
| Pts | 82-84 | 214-175 |
| Total Points | 166 | 389 |
| Winners | 36 | 91 |
| %Winners | 44% | 43% |
Paul played 1 match while Van De Zandschulp competed in 3 matches. Van De Zandschulp started his run from the qualifications while Paul had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Tommy Paul dropped 1 set while Botic Van De Zandschulp hasn’t lost a set so far. Paul has played 3 set(s) less than Van De Zandschulp (3 vs 6). Therefore, Paul played 34 games less than Van De Zandschulp. Tommy scored 36 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Van De Zandschulp fired 91 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Paul | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 20 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 6.7 |
| 1st in | 47/77 | 132/195 |
| %1st in | 61% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 36/47 | 91/132 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 10/30 | 38/63 |
| %2nd pts | 33% | 60% |
Paul made 12 aces . Van De Zandschulp managed to score 20 aces (6.7 per match). Paul won 77% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 33% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Paul | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 11 |
| Converted | 4/5 | 11/23 |
| % Converted | 80% | 48% |
| Conceded | 11 | 10 |
| Saved | 6 | 6 |
| % Saved | 55% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 4 |
The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The American dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 55% of the break points that he conceded. Van De Zandschulp broke his opponents 11 times with a 48% conversion rate. Botic conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Paul | |||
| R1 Gasquet | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 0-6 6-2 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 82-84 | 82-84 | |
| Total points | 166 | 166 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 47/77 | 47/77 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 36/47 | 36/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/30 | 10/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 6/11 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 55% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Van De Zandschulp | |||||
| Q1 Cachin | Q3 Ofner | R1 Mannarino | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 7-67 6-2 | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 21 | 22 | 61 | |
| pts | 61-50 | 75-58 | 78-67 | 214-175 | |
| Total points | 111 | 133 | 145 | 389 | |
| Winners | 32 | 29 | 30 | 91 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 39% | 38% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 5 | 8 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 41/57 | 44/63 | 47/75 | 132/195 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 70% | 63% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 32/41 | 29/44 | 30/47 | 91/132 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 66% | 64% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/16 | 13/19 | 17/28 | 38/63 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 68% | 61% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 4/7 | 4/9 | 11/23 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 57% | 44% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 | 7 | 10 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/3 | 5/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | – | 33% | 71% | 104% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Paris
- Alexander BublikBublik – Nicolas JarryJarry (7-63 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Laslo DjereDjere (6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Andrey RublevRublev – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Taylor FritzFritz (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Carlos AlcarazAlcaraz (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Hubert HurkaczHurkacz (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Novak DjokovicDjokovic – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Daniil MedvedevMedvedev (2-6) – H2H and prediction
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Dominic ThiemThiem – Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tommy PaulPaul – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (5-3) – H2H and prediction
- Casper RuudRuud – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo HumbertHumbert – Alexander ZverevZverev (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (2-0) – H2H and prediction