Blake Mott and Ryan Seggerman will square off in the 2nd round of the Sydney Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on COURT 4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Blake Mott who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Blake Mott is the pick to win this match.
Blake Mott -> 1.68
Ryan Seggerman -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Blake Mott vs. Ryan Seggerman
This will be the 2nd time that Blake Mott and Ryan Seggerman play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Seggerman (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Seggerman won 3-6 6-3 6-4 in the qualifications in the Sydney Challenger back in October 2023.
Blake Mott
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-10 | 15-9 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-13 | 35-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-5 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 438, the Australian reached the 2nd round after beating Yuichiro Inui 7-5 6-78 6-2 and Jose Statham 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Mott had a good straight sets win against Statham (6-3 6-4). During the match, Mott scored 69 points vs Statham’s 52. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Mott scored just 1 ace and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Blake Mott was very efficient on serve to win 77% (34/44) of his 1st serve and 55% (6/11) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Mott broke Statham 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Mott has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 61% of his matches (112-73). 31-9 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Mott has an overall93-57 win-loss record in the last 9 years on hard.
Mott’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Jakarta and M25 Darwin.
Mott has a composed 31-9 win-loss record in 2023, 31-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sydney Challenger
Ryan Seggerman
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-8 | 4-4 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-13 | 25-11 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 711 (career-high), Ryan reached the 2nd round after defeating Kody Pearson 6-4 7-64, Blake Mott 3-6 6-3 6-4 and Benjamin Lock 6-3 4-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Ryan defeated Lock (6-3 4-6 6-4). During the match Seggerman scored 99 points vs Lock’s 94. Ryan was very aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Talking about serving, Seggerman scored 14 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Ryan Seggerman was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 76% (51/67) of his 1st serve and 52% (14/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Lock twice after converting 20% of his break points (2/10).
Seggerman’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Monastir.
Seggerman has an aggregate 27-11 win-loss record in 2023, 25-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sydney Challenger
Seggerman has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mott | Seggerman |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 52 | 80 |
| Pts | 185-152 | 267-241 |
| Total Points | 337 | 508 |
| Winners | 85 | 140 |
| %Winners | 46% | 52% |
Mott played 2 matches while Seggerman competed in 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Blake Mott dropped 1 set, while Ryan Seggerman surrendered 2 sets. Mott has played 3 set(s) less than Seggerman (5 vs 8). Therefore, Mott played 28 games less than Seggerman. Blake scored 85 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Seggerman managed to score 140 winners (52%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mott | Seggerman |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 35 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 11.7 |
| 1st in | 106/155 | 180/241 |
| %1st in | 68% | 75% |
| 1st pts | 85/106 | 140/180 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 27/49 | 34/61 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 56% |
Mott scored 4 aces (2 per match). Seggerman scored 35 aces (11.7 per match). Mott won 80% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Seggerman won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mott | Seggerman |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 5 |
| Converted | 7/19 | 5/22 |
| % Converted | 37% | 23% |
| Conceded | 6 | 7 |
| Saved | 4 | 5 |
| % Saved | 67% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Blake broke his opponents 7 times with a 37% conversion rate. Blake conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Seggerman broke his opponents 5 times with a 23% conversion rate. Seggerman conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mott | |||||
| Q1 Inui |
Q3 Seggerman |
R1 Statham |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-78 6-2 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 28 | 19 | 80 | |
| pts | 116-100 | – | 69-52 | 185-152 | |
| Total points | 216 | 0 | 121 | 337 | |
| Winners | 51 | 34 | 85 | ||
| %Winners | 44% | 0% | 49% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 10 | 5 | 15 | ||
| 1st in | 62/100 | / | 44/55 | 106/155 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 0% | 80% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 51/62 | / | 34/44 | 85/106 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 0% | 77% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/38 | / | 6/11 | 27/49 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 0% | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | ||
| Converted | 4/9 | / | 3/10 | 7/19 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 0% | 30% | 37% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 4 | 6 | ||
| Saved | 1/2 | 0/ | 3/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | – | 75% | 42% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Seggerman | |||||
| Q1 Pearson |
Q3 Mott |
R1 Lock |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-64 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 28 | 29 | 80 | |
| pts | 80-70 | 88-77 | 99-94 | 267-241 | |
| Total points | 150 | 165 | 193 | 508 | |
| Winners | 39 | 50 | 51 | 140 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 57% | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 12 | 14 | 35 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 49/64 | 64/83 | 67/94 | 180/241 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 77% | 71% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 39/49 | 50/64 | 51/67 | 140/180 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 78% | 76% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/15 | 9/19 | 14/27 | 34/61 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 47% | 52% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
| Converted | 1/8 | 2/4 | 2/10 | 5/22 | |
| Converted % | 13% | 50% | 20% | 23% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/1 | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | 83% | 28% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLWWWL
LLWWWWWLWW Tennis Scores in Sydney Challenger
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (6-2 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (4-6 6-3 7-67) – See score progression
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (7-69 6-4) – See score progression
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Blake Bayldon/Kody PearsonBayldon/Kody Pearson – Jake Delaney/Luke SavilleDelaney/Luke Saville (2-6 7-5 10-8) – See score progression
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (6-3 7-68) – See score progression
- Blake MottMott – Jose StathamStatham (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Benjamin LockLock (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Ajeet RaiRai (6-2 7-62) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Pavle MarinkovMarinkov (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Colin SinclairSinclair (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Luke SavilleSaville – Blake EllisEllis (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Omar JasikaJasika (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur WeberWeber – Jacob BradshawBradshaw (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Benjamin LockLock (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Luke SavilleSaville – Taro DanielDaniel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Dane SweenySweeny (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blake MottMott – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur WeberWeber – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-2) – H2H and prediction
