Marc Polmans and Arthur Weber will square off in the 2nd round of the Sydney Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marc Polmans who should win in 2 sets.
Marc Polmans -> 1.23
Arthur Weber -> 3.84
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Marc Polmans vs. Arthur Weber
This will be the 3rd time that Marc Polmans and Arthur Weber clash against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Polmans (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Polmans won 6-3 6-0 in the qualifications in Zhuhai back in September 2023.
Marc Polmans
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7-13 | 3-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 50-35 | 32-23 | 14-9 | 2-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-13 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-28 | 1-6 | 8-13 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 161, the Australian reached the 2nd round after defeating Colin Sinclair 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Sinclair (6-4 6-2). During the match, Polmans scored 67 points vs Sinclair’s 47. Polmans was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Polmans recorded 13 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Marc Polmans was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 86% (25/29) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Marc broke Sinclair 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Polmans has good match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (298-232). 25-19 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Polmans has an aggregate 172-132 record in the last years on hard.
Marc’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Canberra and the Guangzhou Challenger.
The Australian has an overall 41-30 win-loss record in 2023, 25-19 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sydney Challenger
Arthur Weber
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7-9 | 6-5 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-22 | 33-17 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-11 | 18-5 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 304, the French player reached the 2nd round after beating Jacob Bradshaw 7-5 6-2.
In the 1st round, Arthur had a good straight sets win against Bradshaw (7-5 6-2). During the match Weber scored 62 points vs Bradshaw’s 44. Arthur was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Weber made 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Arthur Weber was pretty efficient on serve to win 90% (28/31) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Weber was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Bradshaw 3 times.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Zhuhai Challenger where he beat Jason Jung in the final 6-3 5-7 6-3.
The French player has an aggregate 33-19 win-loss record in 2023, 33-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sydney Challenger
Arthur has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Polmans | Weber |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 20 |
| Pts | 67-47 | 62-44 |
| Total Points | 114 | 106 |
| Winners | 25 | 28 |
| %Winners | 37% | 45% |
Both Polmans and Weber played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Polmans and Weber have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Polmans played 2 games less than Weber. Marc scored 25 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Arthur struck 28 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Polmans | Weber |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 13 | 2 |
| 1st in | 29/48 | 31/50 |
| %1st in | 60% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 25/29 | 28/31 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 90% |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/19 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 63% |
Polmans made 13 aces . Weber blasted 2 aces . Polmans won 86% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Weber won 90% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Polmans | Weber |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/3 |
| % Converted | 33% | 100% |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Polmans broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Polmans was rock solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Arthur broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. Weber was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Polmans | |||
| R1 Sinclair | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 67-47 | 67-47 | |
| Total points | 114 | 114 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 29/48 | 29/48 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 25/29 | 25/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Weber | |||
| R1 Bradshaw | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 62-44 | 62-44 | |
| Total points | 106 | 106 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 31/50 | 31/50 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 28/31 | 28/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Sydney Challenger
- Taro DanielDaniel – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (6-2 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Blake Bayldon/Kody PearsonBayldon/Kody Pearson – Jake Delaney/Luke SavilleDelaney/Luke Saville (2-6 7-5 10-8) – See score progression
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (6-3 7-68) – See score progression
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Benjamin LockLock (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (4-6 6-3 7-67) – See score progression
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (7-69 6-4) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Ajeet RaiRai (6-2 7-62) – See score progression
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Pavle MarinkovMarinkov (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Blake MottMott – Jose StathamStatham (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Omar JasikaJasika (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Luke SavilleSaville – Blake EllisEllis (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Colin SinclairSinclair (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Arthur WeberWeber – Jacob BradshawBradshaw (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Ajeet RaiRai (6-2 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (6-3 7-6(8)) – See score progression
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Blake MottMott – Jose StathamStatham (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Benjamin LockLock (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (6-2 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (7-6(9) 6-4) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (4-6 6-3 7-6(7)) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Pavle MarinkovMarinkov (7-6(5) 6-2) – See score progression
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Luke SavilleSaville – Taro DanielDaniel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Dane SweenySweeny (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blake MottMott – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur WeberWeber – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-2) – H2H and prediction