Tristan Schoolkate and Chak Lam Coleman Wong will face off in the quarter of the Playford Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 11:00 am on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tristan Schoolkate who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tristan Schoolkate is the pick to win this match.
Tristan Schoolkate -> 1.49
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.53
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tristan Schoolkate vs. Chak Lam Coleman Wong
There is no head to head record between Tristan Schoolkate and Chak Lam Coleman Wong since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Tristan Schoolkate
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 20-13 | 20-11 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 44-30 | 30-23 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 48-29 | 24-15 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-20 | 8-9 | 3-5 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2020 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 248, the Australian reached the quarter after beating Pavle Marinkov 6-3 6-4 and Nam Hoang Ly 3-6 6-4 6-2.
In the 2nd round against Hoang Ly, The Australian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-2). During the match, Schoolkate scored 96 points vs Hoang Ly’s 83. Schoolkate was very aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Schoolkate blasted 10 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Tristan Schoolkate was very effective on serve to win 73% (37/51) of his 1st serve and 51% (18/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. The Australian broke Hoang Ly 4 times after converting 29% of his break points (4/14).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Australian has conceded 1 set in this event to win 56% of the points he played.
Schoolkate has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 60% of his matches (126-85). 30-21 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Schoolkate has a compiled72-53 win-loss record in the last 5 years on hard.
Tristan’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Swan Hill.
Tristan has an aggregate 44-27 win-loss record in 2023, 30-21 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Playford Challenger
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 11-12 | 11-10 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 361 (career-high), Lam Coleman Wong reached the quarter after defeating Ajeet Rai 3-6 6-2 6-2 and Thanasi Kokkinakis 7-61 2-0 ret..
In the 2nd round against Kokkinakis, Lam Coleman Wong had a free pass after Kokkinakis retired on a 7-61 2-0 . scoreline.
The’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Monastir,M25 Hong Kong,M15 Doha and the Shenzhen 2 Challenger.
The has an aggregate 46-23 win-loss record in 2023, 35-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Playford Challenger
Chak has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Schoolkate | Lam Coleman Wong |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 5 | 6 |
Tot Games | 46 | 40 |
Pts | 154-120 | 134-110 |
Total Points | 274 | 244 |
Winners | 67 | 59 |
%Winners | 44% | 44% |
Both Schoolkate and Lam Coleman Wong played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Tristan Schoolkate lost 1 set, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong dropped 1 set. Schoolkate has played 1 set(s) less than Lam Coleman Wong (5 vs 6). However, it’s interesting to notice that Schoolkate played 6 games more than Lam Coleman Wong. The Australian scored 67 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Chak blasted 59 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Schoolkate | Lam Coleman Wong |
---|---|---|
Aces | 16 | 11 |
Avg per match | 8 | 5.5 |
1st in | 82/132 | 78/115 |
%1st in | 62% | 68% |
1st pts | 67/82 | 59/78 |
%1st pts | 82% | 76% |
2nd pts | 28/50 | 24/37 |
%2nd pts | 56% | 65% |
Schoolkate scored 16 aces (8 per match). Lam Coleman Wong bagged 11 aces (5.5 per match). Schoolkate won 82% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Schoolkate | Lam Coleman Wong |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 5 |
Converted | 6/17 | 5/13 |
% Converted | 35% | 38% |
Conceded | 7 | 4 |
Saved | 4 | 3 |
% Saved | 57% | 75% |
Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Tristan broke his opponents 6 times with a 35% conversion rate. Tristan surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded. The broke his opponents 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. The conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
Schoolkate | ||||
R1 Marinkov |
R2 Hoang Ly |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 27 | 46 | |
pts | 58-37 | 96-83 | 154-120 | |
Total points | 95 | 179 | 274 | |
Winners | 30 | 37 | 67 | |
%Winners | 52% | 39% | 44% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 6 | 10 | 16 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
1st in | 31/46 | 51/86 | 82/132 | |
% 1st in | 67% | 59% | 62% | |
1st pts | 30/31 | 37/51 | 67/82 | |
% 1st pts | 97% | 73% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 10/15 | 18/35 | 28/50 | |
% 2nd pts | 67% | 51% | 56% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
Converted | 2/3 | 4/14 | 6/17 | |
Converted % | 67% | 29% | 35% | |
Conceded | 0 | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 4/7 | 4 | |
Saved % | – | 57% | 29% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Lam Coleman Wong | ||||
R1 Rai |
R2 Kokkinakis |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | 7-61 2-0 ret. | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 15 | 40 | |
pts | 90-77 | 44-33 | 134-110 | |
Total points | 167 | 77 | 244 | |
Winners | 37 | 22 | 59 | |
%Winners | 41% | 50% | 44% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 8 | 3 | 11 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 53/75 | 25/40 | 78/115 | |
% 1st in | 71% | 63% | 68% | |
1st pts | 37/53 | 22/25 | 59/78 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 88% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 14/22 | 10/15 | 24/37 | |
% 2nd pts | 64% | 67% | 65% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
Converted | 4/12 | 1/1 | 5/13 | |
Converted % | 33% | 100% | 38% | |
Conceded | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 0/0 | 3 | |
Saved % | 75% | – | 38% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – James DuckworthDuckworth (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-0) – H2H and prediction