Emil Ruusuvuori and Tomas Machac will face off in the qualifications of the Erste Bank Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 2:00 pm on #GLAUBANDICH COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emil Ruusuvuori who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emil Ruusuvuori is the pick to win this match.
Emil Ruusuvuori -> 1.71
Tomas Machac -> 2.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emil Ruusuvuori vs. Tomas Machac
There is no head to head record between Emil Ruusuvuori and Tomas Machac since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Emil Ruusuvuori
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 13-12 | 7-5 | 2-5 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 31-30 | 13-11 | 6-7 | 9-8 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 41-32 | 15-12 | 10-9 | 10-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 30-26 | 21-12 | 1-5 | 6-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 27-15 | 11-5 | 0-2 | 16-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 61, Emil got to the qualifications after beating Alexander Erler 6-1 7-5.
In the qualifications, The Finn had a good straight sets win against Erler (6-1 7-5). During the match, Ruusuvuori scored 70 points vs Erler’s 47. Emil was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ruusuvuori made 11 aces and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults. Emil Ruusuvuori was quite efficient on serve to win 80% (32/40) of his 1st serve and 65% (11/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Finn broke Erler 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Ruusuvuori has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 62% of his matches (260-157). 7-4 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Ruusuvuori has an aggregate92-38 win-loss record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
The Finn’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in Hertogenbosch.
The Finn has a composed 29-26 win-loss record in 2023, 7-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Vienna
Tomas Machac
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 21-9 | 12-6 | 7-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 52-27 | 15-10 | 16-11 | 18-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 47-19 | 24-6 | 5-2 | 18-10 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2021 | 28-19 | 5-4 | 5-4 | 12-6 | 2-3 | 4-2 |
2020 | 27-12 | 0-0 | 12-6 | 15-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 81 (career-high), Machac got to the qualifications after beating Jurij Rodionov 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Tomas had a good straight sets win against Rodionov (6-3 6-4). During the match Machac scored 66 points vs Rodionov’s 49. The Czech was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Machac recorded 4 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Tomas Machac was pretty efficient on serve to win 78% (29/37) of his 1st serve and 74% (14/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Tomas broke Rodionov twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Orleans Challenger where he defeated Jack Draper in the final 6-4 4-6 6-3 and the Captif Challenger where he defeated Arthur Fery in the final 6-3 6-4.
The Czech has a composed 49-25 win-loss record in 2023, 15-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Vienna
Tomas has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Ruusuvuori | Machac |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 |
Pts | 70-47 | 66-49 |
Total Points | 117 | 115 |
Winners | 32 | 29 |
%Winners | 46% | 44% |
Both Ruusuvuori and Machac played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Ruusuvuori and Machac have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (19). Emil scored 32 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Tomas fired 29 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Ruusuvuori | Machac |
---|---|---|
Aces | 11 | 4 |
Avg per match | 11 | 4 |
1st in | 40/57 | 37/56 |
%1st in | 70% | 66% |
1st pts | 32/40 | 29/37 |
%1st pts | 80% | 78% |
2nd pts | 11/17 | 14/19 |
%2nd pts | 65% | 74% |
Ruusuvuori struck 11 aces . Machac struck 4 aces . Ruusuvuori won 80% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Machac won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 74% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Ruusuvuori | Machac |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 2 |
Converted | 3/9 | 2/4 |
% Converted | 33% | 50% |
Conceded | 1 | 2 |
Saved | 1 | 2 |
% Saved | 100% | 100% |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The Finn broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Ruusuvuori very solid his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 1 break points. Machac broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Machac was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
Ruusuvuori | |||
Q1 Erler |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 70-47 | 70-47 | |
Total points | 117 | 117 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 46% | 46% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 11 | 11 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 40/57 | 40/57 | |
% 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
1st pts | 32/40 | 32/40 | |
% 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
2nd pts | 11/17 | 11/17 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Machac | |||
Q1 Rodionov |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 66-49 | 66-49 | |
Total points | 115 | 115 | |
Winners | 29 | 29 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 37/56 | 37/56 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 29/37 | 29/37 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 14/19 | 14/19 | |
% 2nd pts | 74% | 74% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Vienna
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gael MonfilsMonfils – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Borna GojoGojo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Sebastian OfnerOfner (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Daniel EvansEvans (4-4) – H2H and prediction
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Dominic ThiemThiem (5-5) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea VavassoriVavassori – Filip MisolicMisolic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Alexandre MullerMuller (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Andrey RublevRublev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Jiri LeheckaLehecka (0-0) – H2H and prediction