James Duckworth and Chak Lam Coleman Wong will square off in the final of the Shenzhen 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is James Duckworth who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, James Duckworth is the pick to win this match.
James Duckworth -> 1.28
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 3.5

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head James Duckworth vs. Chak Lam Coleman Wong

There is no head to head record between James Duckworth and Chak Lam Coleman Wong since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.

James Duckworth

James Duckworth

0 - 0win/loss

Rank
82
High
46
LLLLWWLWWW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 42-29 23-14 2-3 7-7 10-5 0-0
2023 51-28 43-21 1-3 5-2 2-2 0-0
2022 24-27 20-18 0-2 0-1 4-6 0-0
2021 36-24 15-9 1-2 12-9 8-4 0-0
2020 11-10 9-4 1-2 1-4 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 144, Duckworth reached the final after defeating Yusuke Takahashi 6-3 6-2, Zhe Li 7-64 6-4, Li Tu 6-1 6-1 and Bu Yunchaokete 6-1 6-2.

In the semifinal, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Yunchaokete (6-1 6-2). During the match, Duckworth scored 63 points vs Yunchaokete’s 40. Duckworth was very aggressive to blast 17 winners.

Talking about the service games, Duckworth made 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. James Duckworth was pretty effective on serve to win 77% (17/22) of his 1st serve and 67% (20/30) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Duckworth broke Yunchaokete 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).

Overall Performance in this tournament

The Australian hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to conquer 61% of the points he played.

Duckworth has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (295-198). 36-21 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Duckworth has a compiled 203-121 match record in the last years on hard.

Duckworth’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Burnie Challenger,the Bengaluru Challenger and the Morelos Challenger.

Duckworth has a compiled 39-26 win-loss record in 2023, 36-21 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Shenzhen 2 Challenger

Shenzhen 2 Challenger
Duckworth's Record

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

0 - 0win/loss

Rank
161
High
128
WLLWLWLWWL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 39-34 37-24 0-2 2-4 0-4 0-0
2023 53-27 42-19 9-7 2-1 0-0 0-0
2022 24-19 20-12 3-5 1-2 0-0 0-0
2021 11-7 5-4 6-3 0-0 0-0 0-0
2020 2-4 2-4 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 477, Chak got to the final after defeating Linang Xiao 6-3 7-64, Terence Atmane 3-6 6-3 7-5, Tsung-Hao Huang 4-6 7-5 6-3 and Aleksandar Kovacevic w/o.

In the semifinal, Lam Coleman Wong defeated Kovacevic (w/o). During the match Lam Coleman Wong and Kovacevic scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 144 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Chak was not very aggressive do strike just winners.

Talking about serving, Lam Coleman Wong couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Chak Lam Coleman Wong conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (/) on the 2nd serve.

Overall Performance in this tournament

Chak has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.

The’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Monastir,M25 Hong Kong and M15 Doha.

Lam Coleman Wong has an overall 44-22 win-loss record in 2023, 33-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Shenzhen 2 Challenger
Lam Coleman Wong's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

J.Duckworth
C.Lam Wong
4h:52
4h:52
Time on court​
6h:20
6h:20
1h:09
1h:09
Last match​
!
2h:11
2h:11
!
4
4
Match played
3
3
69
69
Games Played​
83
83
8
8
Set played​​
8
8
262
262
Total points​
304
304
65.5
65.5
Avg point​
101.3
101.3
86
86
Winners
103
103
21.5
21.5
Avg Winners​
34.3
34.3
33%
33%
Ratio winners
34%
34%
-- Serve --
26
26
Aces
29
29
6.5
6.5
Avg Aces
9.7
9.7
4
4
Double Faults
12
12
1
1
Avg Double Faults
4
4
86/105
86/105
1st won total​
103/132
103/132
!
82%
82%
1st won %
!
78%
78%
63/93
63/93
2nd won total​
80/156
80/156
!
68%
68%
2nd won %
51%
51%
-- Break Points --
15/27
15/27
BP won
10/39
10/39
3.8/6.8
3.8/6.8
Avg BP won
3.3/13
3.3/13
!
56%
56%
Won
!
26%
26%
14
14
Conceded
25
25
3.5
3.5
Avg Conceded
8.3
8.3
2
2
Broken
6
6
!
0.5
0.5
Avg Broken
2
2
12
12
Saved
19
19

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Duckworth Lam Coleman Wong
Match played 4 3
Tot Set 8 8
Tot Games 69 83
Pts 262-170 304-283
Total Points 432 587
Winners 86 103
%Winners 33% 34%

Duckworth played 4 matches while Lam Coleman Wong competed in 3 matches. At the moment, Chak Lam Coleman Wong conceded 2 sets while James Duckworth hasn’t dropped a set so far. Talking about their workload, Duckworth and Lam Coleman Wong have played the same amount of sets 8. However, Duckworth played 14 games less than Lam Coleman Wong. Duckworth scored 86 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The made 103 winners (34%).

Serve Performance

Serve Duckworth Lam Coleman Wong
Aces 26 29
Avg per match 6.5 9.7
1st in 105/198 132/288
%1st in 53% 46%
1st pts 86/105 103/132
%1st pts 82% 78%
2nd pts 63/93 80/156
%2nd pts 68% 51%

Duckworth fired 26 aces (6.5 per match). Lam Coleman Wong bagged 29 aces (9.7 per match). Duckworth won 82% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Duckworth Lam Coleman Wong
Won 15 10
Converted 15/27 10/39
% Converted 56% 26%
Conceded 14 25
Saved 12 19
% Saved 86% 76%
Times Broken 2 6

Duckworth broke his opponents 15 times with a 56% conversion rate. James surrendered his serve twice and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded. The broke his opponents 10 times with a 26% conversion rate. The conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded.

Duckworth
R1
Takahashi
R2
Li
1/4
Tu
1/2
Yunchaokete
Total
Score 6-3 6-2 7-64 6-4 6-1 6-1 6-1 6-2
Tot Set 2 2 2 2 8
Tot Games 17 23 14 15 69
pts 58-33 90-77 51-20 63-40 262-170
Total points 91 167 71 103 432
Winners 22 31 16 17 86
%Winners 38% 34% 31% 27% 33%
SERVE
Aces 7 12 1 6 26
Double Faults 1 0 0 3 4
1st in 26/40 39/74 18/32 22/52 105/198
% 1st in 65% 53% 56% 42% 53%
1st pts 22/26 31/39 16/18 17/22 86/105
% 1st pts 85% 79% 89% 77% 82%
2nd pts 11/14 20/35 12/14 20/30 63/93
% 2nd pts 79% 57% 86% 67% 68%
Breaks
Won 4 2 5 4 15
Converted 4/9 2/6 5/6 4/6 15/27
Converted % 44% 33% 83% 67% 56%
Conceded 1 7 0 6 14
Saved 0/1 6/7 0/0 6/6 12
Saved % 0% 86% 100% 47%
Times Broken 1 1 0 0 2
Lam Coleman Wong
R1
Xiao
R2
Atmane
1/4
Huang
1/2
Kovacevic
Total
Score 6-3 7-64 3-6 6-3 7-5 4-6 7-5 6-3 w/o
Tot Set 2 3 3 8
Tot Games 22 30 31 83
pts 87-75 102-103 115-105 304-283
Total points 162 205 220 587
Winners 30 40 33 103
%Winners 34% 39% 29% 34%
SERVE
Aces 15 5 9 29
Double Faults 3 5 4 12
1st in 41/85 51/106 40/97 132/288
% 1st in 48% 48% 41% 46%
1st pts 30/41 40/51 33/40 103/132
% 1st pts 73% 78% 83% 78%
2nd pts 26/44 25/55 29/57 80/156
% 2nd pts 59% 45% 51% 51%
Breaks
Won 2 3 5 10
Converted 2/7 3/15 5/17 10/39
Converted % 29% 20% 29% 26%
Conceded 8 8 9 25
Saved 7/8 6/8 6/9 19
Saved % 88% 75% 67% 58%
Times Broken 1 2 3 6

Upcoming matches in the draw