James Duckworth and Chak Lam Coleman Wong will square off in the final of the Shenzhen 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James Duckworth who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, James Duckworth is the pick to win this match.
James Duckworth -> 1.28
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 3.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head James Duckworth vs. Chak Lam Coleman Wong
There is no head to head record between James Duckworth and Chak Lam Coleman Wong since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
James Duckworth
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-17 | 16-8 | 2-3 | 5-2 | 10-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-28 | 43-21 | 1-3 | 5-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-27 | 20-18 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-24 | 15-9 | 1-2 | 12-9 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-10 | 9-4 | 1-2 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 144, Duckworth reached the final after defeating Yusuke Takahashi 6-3 6-2, Zhe Li 7-64 6-4, Li Tu 6-1 6-1 and Bu Yunchaokete 6-1 6-2.
In the semifinal, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Yunchaokete (6-1 6-2). During the match, Duckworth scored 63 points vs Yunchaokete’s 40. Duckworth was very aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Talking about the service games, Duckworth made 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. James Duckworth was pretty effective on serve to win 77% (17/22) of his 1st serve and 67% (20/30) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Duckworth broke Yunchaokete 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Australian hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to conquer 61% of the points he played.
Duckworth has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (295-198). 36-21 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Duckworth has a compiled 203-121 match record in the last years on hard.
Duckworth’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Burnie Challenger,the Bengaluru Challenger and the Morelos Challenger.
Duckworth has a compiled 39-26 win-loss record in 2023, 36-21 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Shenzhen 2 Challenger
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-18 | 14-12 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 477, Chak got to the final after defeating Linang Xiao 6-3 7-64, Terence Atmane 3-6 6-3 7-5, Tsung-Hao Huang 4-6 7-5 6-3 and Aleksandar Kovacevic w/o.
In the semifinal, Lam Coleman Wong defeated Kovacevic (w/o). During the match Lam Coleman Wong and Kovacevic scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 144 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Chak was not very aggressive do strike just winners.
Talking about serving, Lam Coleman Wong couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Chak Lam Coleman Wong conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Chak has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
The’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Monastir,M25 Hong Kong and M15 Doha.
Lam Coleman Wong has an overall 44-22 win-loss record in 2023, 33-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Duckworth | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 69 | 83 |
| Pts | 262-170 | 304-283 |
| Total Points | 432 | 587 |
| Winners | 86 | 103 |
| %Winners | 33% | 34% |
Duckworth played 4 matches while Lam Coleman Wong competed in 3 matches. At the moment, Chak Lam Coleman Wong conceded 2 sets while James Duckworth hasn’t dropped a set so far. Talking about their workload, Duckworth and Lam Coleman Wong have played the same amount of sets 8. However, Duckworth played 14 games less than Lam Coleman Wong. Duckworth scored 86 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The made 103 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Duckworth | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 26 | 29 |
| Avg per match | 6.5 | 9.7 |
| 1st in | 105/198 | 132/288 |
| %1st in | 53% | 46% |
| 1st pts | 86/105 | 103/132 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 63/93 | 80/156 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 51% |
Duckworth fired 26 aces (6.5 per match). Lam Coleman Wong bagged 29 aces (9.7 per match). Duckworth won 82% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Duckworth | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 15 | 10 |
| Converted | 15/27 | 10/39 |
| % Converted | 56% | 26% |
| Conceded | 14 | 25 |
| Saved | 12 | 19 |
| % Saved | 86% | 76% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 |
Duckworth broke his opponents 15 times with a 56% conversion rate. James surrendered his serve twice and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded. The broke his opponents 10 times with a 26% conversion rate. The conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded.
| Duckworth | ||||||
| R1 Takahashi |
R2 Li |
1/4 Tu |
1/2 Yunchaokete |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 7-64 6-4 | 6-1 6-1 | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 23 | 14 | 15 | 69 | |
| pts | 58-33 | 90-77 | 51-20 | 63-40 | 262-170 | |
| Total points | 91 | 167 | 71 | 103 | 432 | |
| Winners | 22 | 31 | 16 | 17 | 86 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 34% | 31% | 27% | 33% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 7 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 26 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 26/40 | 39/74 | 18/32 | 22/52 | 105/198 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 53% | 56% | 42% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 22/26 | 31/39 | 16/18 | 17/22 | 86/105 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 79% | 89% | 77% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/14 | 20/35 | 12/14 | 20/30 | 63/93 | |
| % 2nd pts | 79% | 57% | 86% | 67% | 68% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 15 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 2/6 | 5/6 | 4/6 | 15/27 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 33% | 83% | 67% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 14 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 6/7 | 0/0 | 6/6 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 86% | – | 100% | 47% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Lam Coleman Wong | ||||||
| R1 Xiao |
R2 Atmane |
1/4 Huang |
1/2 Kovacevic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-64 | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | w/o | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | – | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 30 | 31 | – | 83 | |
| pts | 87-75 | 102-103 | 115-105 | – | 304-283 | |
| Total points | 162 | 205 | 220 | – | 587 | |
| Winners | 30 | 40 | 33 | – | 103 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 39% | 29% | – | 34% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 15 | 5 | 9 | – | 29 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 5 | 4 | – | 12 | |
| 1st in | 41/85 | 51/106 | 40/97 | – | 132/288 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 48% | 41% | – | 46% | |
| 1st pts | 30/41 | 40/51 | 33/40 | – | 103/132 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 78% | 83% | – | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 26/44 | 25/55 | 29/57 | – | 80/156 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 45% | 51% | – | 51% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | – | 10 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 3/15 | 5/17 | – | 10/39 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 20% | 29% | – | 26% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | 9 | – | 25 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 6/8 | 6/9 | – | 19 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 75% | 67% | – | 58% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | – | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWWLWW
LLLLWWWLLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
