Stefanos Tsitsipas and Yannick Hanfmann will play each other in the quarter of the European Open for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 7:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Stefanos Tsitsipas who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Stefanos Tsitsipas is the pick to win this match.
Stefanos Tsitsipas -> 1.29
Yannick Hanfmann -> 3.6
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Stefanos Tsitsipas vs. Yannick Hanfmann
This will be the 4th time that Stefanos Tsitsipas and Yannick Hanfmann square off. The head to head is 2-1 for Hanfmann (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they locked horns, Hanfmann won 6-4 3-6 6-2 in the 2nd round in Mallorca back in June 2023.
Highlights Yannick Hanfmann vs Stefanos Tsitsipas – Mallorca 28-June-2023
Stefanos Tsitsipas
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 45-22 | 13-11 | 22-6 | 8-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-24 | 19-9 | 17-5 | 11-6 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 61-24 | 18-8 | 17-4 | 18-9 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 55-19 | 26-8 | 23-5 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 29-14 | 11-6 | 11-3 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 7, Tsitsipas reached the quarter after defeating Botic Van De Zandschulp 7-5 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Stefanos had a good straight sets win against Van De Zandschulp (7-5 6-3). During the match, Tsitsipas scored 75 points vs Van De Zandschulp’s 64. The Greek was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Tsitsipas fired 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Stefanos Tsitsipas was extremely effective on serve to win 75% (30/40) of his 1st serve and 55% (16/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Stefanos broke Van De Zandschulp 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Tsitsipas has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 69% of his matches (437-198). 4-1 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Tsitsipas has a composed81-44 win-loss record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current season was conquering the title in Los Cabos where he overcame Alex De Minaur in the final 6-3 6-4.
Tsitsipas has an overall 44-19 win-loss record in 2023, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Antwerp
Yannick Hanfmann
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-33 | 8-11 | 12-15 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-30 | 6-8 | 29-14 | 4-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-26 | 4-3 | 21-16 | 7-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-24 | 1-4 | 14-11 | 1-4 | 2-4 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 27-15 | 7-5 | 15-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 56, Hanfmann reached the quarter after beating Alexander Blockx 6-4 7-63 and Dominic Thiem 6-4 5-7 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Hanfmann defeated Thiem (6-4 5-7 6-4).During the match Hanfmann scored less points (6) than Thiem. In fact, the world no. 7 won 101 points vs Thiem’s. That means that Hanfmann was more focused during the important points. Yannick was exceptionally aggressive to blast 57 winners.
About the serving games, Hanfmann managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Yannick Hanfmann lost the serve twice and he saved 13 break points. Furthermore, Hanfmann put 69% of his first serves in, winning 70% (57/81) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (15/36) on the 2nd serve. Yannick was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Thiem 3 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
The German has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 50% of the points he played.
Hanfmann’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in Houston and Mallorca.
Yannick has an aggregate 43-26 win-loss record in 2023, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tsitsipas | Hanfmann |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 55 |
| Pts | 75-64 | 174-174 |
| Total Points | 139 | 348 |
| Winners | 30 | 92 |
| %Winners | 40% | 53% |
Tsitsipas played 1 match while Hanfmann competed in 2 matches. At the moment, Yannick Hanfmann surrendered 1 set while Stefanos Tsitsipas hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Tsitsipas has played 3 set(s) less than Hanfmann (2 vs 5). Therefore, Tsitsipas played 34 games less than Hanfmann. Stefanos scored 30 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The German made 92 winners (53%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tsitsipas | Hanfmann |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 5 |
| 1st in | 40/69 | 128/188 |
| %1st in | 58% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 30/40 | 92/128 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 16/29 | 31/60 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 52% |
Tsitsipas fired 6 aces . Hanfmann managed to score 10 aces (5 per match). Tsitsipas won 75% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Hanfmann won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tsitsipas | Hanfmann |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/10 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 30% | 44% |
| Conceded | 5 | 18 |
| Saved | 4 | 16 |
| % Saved | 80% | 89% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Stefanos broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. The Greek surrendered his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Hanfmann broke his opponents 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Hanfmann conceded his serve twice and he saved 89% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tsitsipas | |||
| R2 Van De Zandschulp |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 75-64 | 75-64 | |
| Total points | 139 | 139 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 40/69 | 40/69 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 30/40 | 30/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/29 | 16/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Hanfmann | ||||
| R1 Blockx |
R2 Thiem |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-63 | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 32 | 55 | |
| pts | 73-67 | 101-107 | 174-174 | |
| Total points | 140 | 208 | 348 | |
| Winners | 35 | 57 | 92 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 56% | 53% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 47/71 | 81/117 | 128/188 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 69% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 35/47 | 57/81 | 92/128 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 70% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/24 | 15/36 | 31/60 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 42% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| Converted | 1/6 | 3/3 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 17% | 100% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 15 | 18 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 13/15 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 87% | 187% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWLWL
LLLLLLWWWW Tennis Scores in Antwerp
- Petros Tsitsipas/Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas/Stefanos Tsitsipas – Matwe Middelkoop/Andreas MiesMiddelkoop/Andreas Mies (7-5 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Hugo GastonGaston (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (1-2) – H2H and prediction
