Arthur Fils and Juan Pablo Varillas will face off in the quarter of the European Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 9:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Arthur Fils who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Arthur Fils is the pick to win this match.
Arthur Fils -> 1.27
Juan Pablo Varillas -> 3.78
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Arthur Fils vs. Juan Pablo Varillas
There is no head to head record between Arthur Fils and Juan Pablo Varillas since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Arthur Fils
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22-11 | 10-6 | 10-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-28 | 15-9 | 14-10 | 7-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-24 | 5-4 | 13-8 | 21-10 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-28 | 0-1 | 23-15 | 20-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 33-26 | 3-2 | 29-17 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 38 (career-high), the French player reached the quarter after beating Mark Lajal 7-64 7-62.
In the 2nd round, Fils had a good straight sets win against Lajal (7-64 7-62). During the match, Fils scored 86 points vs Lajal’s 83. The French player was exceptionally aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about the service games, Fils bagged 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Arthur Fils conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 8 break points. Furthermore, Fils put 55% of his first serves in, winning 87% (45/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (19/42) on the 2nd serve.
Fils has a solid record in the last 4 years having won 60% of his matches (114-76). 15-6 on indoor hard courts in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Fils has an aggregate36-26 record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Oeiras 2 Challenger where he beat Joris De Loore in the final 6-1 7-6(4) and in Lyon where he beat Francisco Cerundolo in the final 6-3 7-5.
Arthur has a compiled 37-20 win-loss record in 2023, 15-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Antwerp
Arthur has never competed in this tournament before.
Juan Pablo Varillas
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 31-20 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-31 | 0-5 | 27-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 4-7 | 23-17 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 53-27 | 2-3 | 51-23 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-23 | 0-2 | 51-20 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 69, the Peruvian got to the quarter after defeating Fabian Marozsan 7-67 6-4 and Alexander Shevchenko 3-6 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round against Shevchenko, Juan recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 6-2). During the match Pablo Patino-Samudio scored 84 points vs Shevchenko’s 72. Juan was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
About the serving games, Pablo Patino-Samudio scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Juan Pablo Varillas lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Pablo Patino-Samudio put 67% of his first serves in, winning 67% (35/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the 2nd serve. Pablo Patino-Samudio broke Shevchenko 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Juan has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Pablo Patino-Samudio’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Sanremo Challenger.
Juan has an aggregate 27-25 win-loss record in 2023, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fils | Pablo Patino-Samudio |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 49 |
| Pts | 86-83 | 173-155 |
| Total Points | 169 | 328 |
| Winners | 45 | 74 |
| %Winners | 52% | 43% |
Fils played 1 match while Pablo Patino-Samudio competed in 2 matches. At the moment, Juan Pablo Varillas lost 1 set while Arthur Fils hasn’t dropped a set so far. Fils has played 3 set(s) less than Pablo Patino-Samudio (2 vs 5). Therefore, Fils played 23 games less than Pablo Patino-Samudio. Arthur scored 45 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, Pablo Patino-Samudio struck 74 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fils | Pablo Patino-Samudio |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 6 |
| 1st in | 52/94 | 111/177 |
| %1st in | 55% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 45/52 | 74/111 |
| %1st pts | 87% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 19/42 | 33/66 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 50% |
Fils bagged 6 aces . Pablo Patino-Samudio blasted 12 aces (6 per match). Fils won 87% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Pablo Patino-Samudio won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fils | Pablo Patino-Samudio |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 0 | 8 |
| Converted | 0/1 | 8/11 |
| % Converted | 0% | 73% |
| Conceded | 8 | 17 |
| Saved | 8 | 12 |
| % Saved | 100% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
Arthur hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Fils pretty solid on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 8 break points without even conceding a single break point. The Peruvian broke his opponents 8 times with a 73% conversion rate. The Peruvian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Fils | |||
| R2 Lajal |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 86-83 | 86-83 | |
| Total points | 169 | 169 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 52/94 | 52/94 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 45/52 | 45/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/42 | 19/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | 0 | |
| Converted | 0/1 | 0/1 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 8/8 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Pablo Patino-Samudio | ||||
| R1 Marozsan |
R2 Shevchenko |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-67 6-4 | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 26 | 49 | |
| pts | 89-83 | 84-72 | 173-155 | |
| Total points | 172 | 156 | 328 | |
| Winners | 39 | 35 | 74 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 42% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 11 | 1 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 59/99 | 52/78 | 111/177 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 67% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 39/59 | 35/52 | 74/111 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/40 | 14/26 | 33/66 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 54% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 5/6 | 8/11 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 83% | 73% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 6 | 17 | |
| Saved | 9/11 | 3/6 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 82% | 50% | 132% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWLLW
LWWLWWWWLW Tennis Scores in Antwerp
- Petros Tsitsipas/Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas/Stefanos Tsitsipas – Matwe Middelkoop/Andreas MiesMiddelkoop/Andreas Mies (7-5 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Dominic ThiemThiem – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (1-0) – H2H and prediction
