Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Tsung-Hao Huang will play each other in the quarter of the Shenzhen 2 Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:00 am on COURT 6. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.47
Tsung-Hao Huang -> 2.59

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Tsung-Hao Huang

This will be the 3rd time that Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Tsung-Hao Huang square off. The head to head is 1-1 for Lam Coleman Wong and Huang (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on hard.

The last time that they played, Lam Coleman Wong won 6-4 6-1 in the 1st round in M15 Hong Kong back in 2020.

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

0 - 0win/loss

Rank
170
High
128
LWLWWLLWLW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 41-36 39-26 0-2 2-4 0-4 0-0
2023 53-27 42-19 9-7 2-1 0-0 0-0
2022 24-19 20-12 3-5 1-2 0-0 0-0
2021 11-7 5-4 6-3 0-0 0-0 0-0
2020 2-4 2-4 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 477, Chak reached the quarter after defeating Linang Xiao 6-3 7-64 and Terence Atmane 3-6 6-3 7-5.

In the 2nd round against Atmane, Lam Coleman Wong recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 7-5).During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored less points (1) than Atmane. In fact, the world no. 477 won 102 points vs Atmane’s. That means that Lam Coleman Wong was more focused during the important points. Chak was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.

Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong blasted 5 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 48% of his first serves in, winning 78% (40/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (25/55) on the 2nd serve. The broke Atmane 3 times after converting 20% of his break points (3/15).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Lam Coleman Wong has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to conquer 51% of the points he played.

Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 5 years having won 58% of his matches (81-59). 32-14 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lam Coleman Wong has a compiled60-41 match record in the last 5 years on hard.

Chak’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Monastir,M25 Hong Kong and M15 Doha.

The has an aggregate 43-22 win-loss record in 2023, 32-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Shenzhen 2 Challenger

Lam Coleman Wong has never competed in this tournament before.

Shenzhen 2 Challenger
Lam Coleman Wong's Record

Tsung-Hao Huang

Tsung-Hao Huang

0 - 0win/loss

Rank
707
High
521
LLWWWLWLLL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 24-29 23-27 0-1 1-1 0-0 0-0
2023 26-21 23-19 3-2 0-0 0-0 0-0
2022 31-21 28-17 3-4 0-0 0-0 0-0
2021 5-9 5-6 0-3 0-0 0-0 0-0
2020 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 625, Huang reached the quarter after defeating Jiayang Dong 6-0 6-0, Ray Ho 6-3 6-2, Benjamin Lock 7-5 6-4 and Egor Gerasimov 6-3 6-2.

In the 2nd round, Tsung-Hao had a good straight sets win against Gerasimov (6-3 6-2). During the match Huang scored 57 points vs Gerasimov’s 39. The Chinese was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.

About the serving games, Huang scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Tsung-Hao Huang lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Huang put 57% of his first serves in, winning 72% (21/29) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (11/22) on the 2nd serve. Huang broke Gerasimov 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).

Overall Performance in this tournament

The Chinese started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this competition to conquer 59% of the points he played.

The Chinese’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Jakarta and M25 Tainan.

Huang has a compiled 23-18 win-loss record in 2023, 20-16 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Shenzhen 2 Challenger
Huang's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

C.Lam Wong
T.Huang
4h:09
4h:09
Time on court​
4h:36
4h:36
!
2h:20
2h:20
Last match​
1h:02
1h:02
2
2
Match played
!
4
4
52
52
Games Played​
68
68
5
5
Set played​​
8
8
189
189
Total points​
245
245
94.5
94.5
Avg point​
61.3
61.3
70
70
Winners
102
102
35
35
Avg Winners​
25.5
25.5
37%
37%
Ratio winners
42%
42%
-- Serve --
20
20
Aces
12
12
10
10
Avg Aces
3
3
8
8
Double Faults
6
6
4
4
Avg Double Faults
1.5
1.5
70/92
70/92
1st won total​
102/140
102/140
!
76%
76%
1st won %
!
73%
73%
51/99
51/99
2nd won total​
49/87
49/87
52%
52%
2nd won %
56%
56%
-- Break Points --
5/22
5/22
BP won
18/27
18/27
2.5/11
2.5/11
Avg BP won
4.5/6.8
4.5/6.8
!
23%
23%
Won
!
67%
67%
16
16
Conceded
16
16
8
8
Avg Conceded
4
4
3
3
Broken
4
4
1.5
1.5
Avg Broken
1
1
13
13
Saved
12
12

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Lam Coleman Wong Huang
Match played 2 4
Tot Set 5 8
Tot Games 52 68
Pts 189-178 245-168
Total Points 367 413
Winners 70 102
%Winners 37% 42%

Lam Coleman Wong played 2 matches while Huang competed in 4 matches. Huang started his run from the qualifications while Lam Coleman Wong had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Chak Lam Coleman Wong dropped 1 set while Tsung-Hao Huang hasn’t dropped a set so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 3 set(s) less than Huang (5 vs 8). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 16 games less than Huang. Lam Coleman Wong scored 70 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Huang struck 102 winners (42%).

Serve Performance

Serve Lam Coleman Wong Huang
Aces 20 12
Avg per match 10 3
1st in 92/191 140/227
%1st in 48% 62%
1st pts 70/92 102/140
%1st pts 76% 73%
2nd pts 51/99 49/87
%2nd pts 52% 56%

Lam Coleman Wong blasted 20 aces (10 per match). Huang made 12 aces (3 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 76% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Huang won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Lam Coleman Wong Huang
Won 5 18
Converted 5/22 18/27
% Converted 23% 67%
Conceded 16 16
Saved 13 12
% Saved 81% 75%
Times Broken 3 4

Chak broke his opponents 5 times with a 23% conversion rate. The surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 81% of the break points that he conceded. Huang broke his opponents 18 times with a 67% conversion rate. Huang conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.

Lam Coleman Wong
R1
Xiao
R2
Atmane
Total
Score 6-3 7-64 3-6 6-3 7-5
Tot Set 2 3 5
Tot Games 22 30 52
pts 87-75 102-103 189-178
Total points 162 205 367
Winners 30 40 70
%Winners 34% 39% 37%
SERVE
Aces 15 5 20
Double Faults 3 5 8
1st in 41/85 51/106 92/191
% 1st in 48% 48% 48%
1st pts 30/41 40/51 70/92
% 1st pts 73% 78% 76%
2nd pts 26/44 25/55 51/99
% 2nd pts 59% 45% 52%
Breaks
Won 2 3 5
Converted 2/7 3/15 5/22
Converted % 29% 20% 23%
Conceded 8 8 16
Saved 7/8 6/8 13
Saved % 88% 75% 82%
Times Broken 1 2 3
Huang
Q1
Dong
Q3
Ho
R1
Lock
R2
Gerasimov
Total
Score 6-0 6-0 6-3 6-2 7-5 6-4 6-3 6-2
Tot Set 2 2 2 2 8
Tot Games 12 17 22 17 68
pts 52-18 64-46 72-65 57-39 245-168
Total points 70 110 137 96 413
Winners 17 28 36 21 102
%Winners 33% 44% 50% 37% 42%
SERVE
Aces 2 4 5 1 12
Double Faults 0 2 3 1 6
1st in 22/35 38/63 51/78 29/51 140/227
% 1st in 63% 60% 65% 57% 62%
1st pts 17/22 28/38 36/51 21/29 102/140
% 1st pts 77% 74% 71% 72% 73%
2nd pts 9/13 14/25 15/27 11/22 49/87
% 2nd pts 69% 56% 56% 50% 56%
Breaks
Won 6 4 3 5 18
Converted 6/9 4/8 3/4 5/6 18/27
Converted % 67% 50% 75% 83% 67%
Conceded 0 5 8 3 16
Saved 0/0 4/5 7/8 1/3 12
Saved % 80% 88% 33% 101%
Times Broken 0 1 1 2 4

Upcoming matches in the draw