Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Tsung-Hao Huang will play each other in the quarter of the Shenzhen 2 Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:00 am on COURT 6. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.47
Tsung-Hao Huang -> 2.59
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Tsung-Hao Huang
This will be the 3rd time that Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Tsung-Hao Huang square off. The head to head is 1-1 for Lam Coleman Wong and Huang (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on hard.
The last time that they played, Lam Coleman Wong won 6-4 6-1 in the 1st round in M15 Hong Kong back in 2020.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-18 | 14-12 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 477, Chak reached the quarter after defeating Linang Xiao 6-3 7-64 and Terence Atmane 3-6 6-3 7-5.
In the 2nd round against Atmane, Lam Coleman Wong recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 7-5).During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored less points (1) than Atmane. In fact, the world no. 477 won 102 points vs Atmane’s. That means that Lam Coleman Wong was more focused during the important points. Chak was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong blasted 5 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 48% of his first serves in, winning 78% (40/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (25/55) on the 2nd serve. The broke Atmane 3 times after converting 20% of his break points (3/15).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Lam Coleman Wong has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to conquer 51% of the points he played.
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 5 years having won 58% of his matches (81-59). 32-14 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lam Coleman Wong has a compiled60-41 match record in the last 5 years on hard.
Chak’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Monastir,M25 Hong Kong and M15 Doha.
The has an aggregate 43-22 win-loss record in 2023, 32-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Shenzhen 2 Challenger
Lam Coleman Wong has never competed in this tournament before.
Tsung-Hao Huang
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-14 | 10-13 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-21 | 23-19 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-21 | 28-17 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 5-9 | 5-6 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 625, Huang reached the quarter after defeating Jiayang Dong 6-0 6-0, Ray Ho 6-3 6-2, Benjamin Lock 7-5 6-4 and Egor Gerasimov 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Tsung-Hao had a good straight sets win against Gerasimov (6-3 6-2). During the match Huang scored 57 points vs Gerasimov’s 39. The Chinese was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
About the serving games, Huang scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Tsung-Hao Huang lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Huang put 57% of his first serves in, winning 72% (21/29) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (11/22) on the 2nd serve. Huang broke Gerasimov 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Chinese started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this competition to conquer 59% of the points he played.
The Chinese’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Jakarta and M25 Tainan.
Huang has a compiled 23-18 win-loss record in 2023, 20-16 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Huang |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 52 | 68 |
| Pts | 189-178 | 245-168 |
| Total Points | 367 | 413 |
| Winners | 70 | 102 |
| %Winners | 37% | 42% |
Lam Coleman Wong played 2 matches while Huang competed in 4 matches. Huang started his run from the qualifications while Lam Coleman Wong had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Chak Lam Coleman Wong dropped 1 set while Tsung-Hao Huang hasn’t dropped a set so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 3 set(s) less than Huang (5 vs 8). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 16 games less than Huang. Lam Coleman Wong scored 70 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Huang struck 102 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Huang |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 20 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 3 |
| 1st in | 92/191 | 140/227 |
| %1st in | 48% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 70/92 | 102/140 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 51/99 | 49/87 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 56% |
Lam Coleman Wong blasted 20 aces (10 per match). Huang made 12 aces (3 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 76% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Huang won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Huang |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 18 |
| Converted | 5/22 | 18/27 |
| % Converted | 23% | 67% |
| Conceded | 16 | 16 |
| Saved | 13 | 12 |
| % Saved | 81% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Chak broke his opponents 5 times with a 23% conversion rate. The surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 81% of the break points that he conceded. Huang broke his opponents 18 times with a 67% conversion rate. Huang conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | ||||
| R1 Xiao |
R2 Atmane |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-64 | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 30 | 52 | |
| pts | 87-75 | 102-103 | 189-178 | |
| Total points | 162 | 205 | 367 | |
| Winners | 30 | 40 | 70 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 39% | 37% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 15 | 5 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 41/85 | 51/106 | 92/191 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 48% | 48% | |
| 1st pts | 30/41 | 40/51 | 70/92 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 78% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 26/44 | 25/55 | 51/99 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 45% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 3/15 | 5/22 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 20% | 23% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | 16 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 6/8 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 75% | 82% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Huang | ||||||
| Q1 Dong |
Q3 Ho |
R1 Lock |
R2 Gerasimov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-0 | 6-3 6-2 | 7-5 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 17 | 22 | 17 | 68 | |
| pts | 52-18 | 64-46 | 72-65 | 57-39 | 245-168 | |
| Total points | 70 | 110 | 137 | 96 | 413 | |
| Winners | 17 | 28 | 36 | 21 | 102 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 44% | 50% | 37% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 2 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 22/35 | 38/63 | 51/78 | 29/51 | 140/227 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 60% | 65% | 57% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 17/22 | 28/38 | 36/51 | 21/29 | 102/140 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 74% | 71% | 72% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/13 | 14/25 | 15/27 | 11/22 | 49/87 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 56% | 56% | 50% | 56% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 18 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 4/8 | 3/4 | 5/6 | 18/27 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 50% | 75% | 83% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 16 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 4/5 | 7/8 | 1/3 | 12 | |
| Saved % | – | 80% | 88% | 33% | 101% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWWWLLL
LWWLLWLLLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Li TuTu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tsung-Hao HuangHuang – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Yan BaiBai (0-0) – H2H and prediction
