Gonzalo Lama and Adolfo Daniel Vallejo will face off in the qualifications of the Santa Fe 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on CANCHA 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Adolfo Daniel Vallejo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Adolfo Daniel Vallejo is the pick to win this match.
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo -> 1.62
Gonzalo Lama -> 2.19
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Gonzalo Lama vs. Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
There is no head to head record between Gonzalo Lama and Adolfo Daniel Vallejo since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Gonzalo Lama
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 18-29 | 3-4 | 15-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 39-29 | 0-0 | 39-28 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 49-19 | 0-1 | 49-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 21-16 | 1-4 | 20-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 407, Lama got to the qualifications after beating Facundo Juarez 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Chilean had a good straight sets win against Juarez (6-3 6-4). During the match, Lama scored 67 points vs Juarez’s 50. Gonzalo was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lama fired 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Gonzalo Lama was pretty effective on serve to win 86% (32/37) of his 1st serve and 56% (14/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Gonzalo broke Juarez twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Lama has good record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (304-213). 15-24 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lama has an aggregate 293-189 record in the last years on clay.
Gonzalo has an overall 17-26 win-loss record in 2023, 15-24 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Santa Fe 2 Challenger
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 32-25 | 7-4 | 25-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 30-25 | 6-8 | 24-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 23-17 | 17-8 | 4-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 461, Adolfo got to the qualifications after defeating Renzo Olivo 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Paraguayan had a good straight sets win against Olivo (6-1 6-1). During the match Daniel scored 65 points vs Olivo’s 37. Daniel was pretty aggressive to blast 19 winners.
About the serving games, Daniel scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Adolfo Daniel Vallejo was quite effective on serve to win 73% (19/26) of his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Paraguayan broke Olivo 6 times after converting 40% of his break points (6/15).
Daniel’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in Santa Fe and the Santa Fe Challenger.
The Paraguayan has a composed 29-21 win-loss record in 2023, 23-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Lama | Daniel |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 14 |
Pts | 67-50 | 65-37 |
Total Points | 117 | 102 |
Winners | 32 | 19 |
%Winners | 48% | 29% |
Both Lama and Daniel played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Lama and Daniel have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Lama played 5 games more than Daniel. Gonzalo scored 32 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, The Paraguayan made 19 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Lama | Daniel |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 1 |
Avg per match | 4 | 1 |
1st in | 37/62 | 26/49 |
%1st in | 60% | 53% |
1st pts | 32/37 | 19/26 |
%1st pts | 86% | 73% |
2nd pts | 14/25 | 13/23 |
%2nd pts | 56% | 57% |
Lama struck 4 aces . Daniel managed to score 1 ace . Lama won 86% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Daniel won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Lama | Daniel |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 6 |
Converted | 2/3 | 6/15 |
% Converted | 67% | 40% |
Conceded | 3 | 6 |
Saved | 3 | 5 |
% Saved | 100% | 83% |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Gonzalo broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. The Chilean very solid his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 3 break points. The Paraguayan broke his opponent 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Paraguayan conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
Lama | |||
Q1 Juarez |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 67-50 | 67-50 | |
Total points | 117 | 117 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 48% | 48% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 37/62 | 37/62 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
1st pts | 32/37 | 32/37 | |
% 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
2nd pts | 14/25 | 14/25 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Daniel | |||
Q1 Olivo |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
pts | 65-37 | 65-37 | |
Total points | 102 | 102 | |
Winners | 19 | 19 | |
%Winners | 29% | 29% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 26/49 | 26/49 | |
% 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
1st pts | 19/26 | 19/26 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 13/23 | 13/23 | |
% 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/15 | 6/15 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gastao EliasElias – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Andrea CollariniCollarini (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Jozef KovalikKovalik (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Alafia AyeniAyeni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Facundo BagnisBagnis (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (0-0) – H2H and prediction