Mats Rosenkranz and Daniel Masur will face off in the qualifications of the Hamburg Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Masur who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Masur is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Masur -> 1.67
Mats Rosenkranz -> 2.11
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mats Rosenkranz vs. Daniel Masur
This will be the 3rd time that Mats Rosenkranz and Daniel Masur play each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Masur (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Masur won 6-3 7-5 in the semifinal in M15 Oberhaching back in February 2023.
Mats Rosenkranz
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-11 | 0-3 | 7-2 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2023 | 35-34 | 4-9 | 4-10 | 22-12 | 2-2 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 31-36 | 2-4 | 7-14 | 14-13 | 2-4 | 6-1 |
| 2021 | 42-30 | 1-1 | 20-18 | 15-9 | 5-0 | 1-2 |
| 2020 | 15-21 | 8-9 | 1-3 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
Ranked no. 418, Mats reached the qualifications after beating Tim Handel 4-6 7-62 6-4.
In the qualifications against Handel, The German recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-62 6-4). During the match, Rosenkranz scored 111 points vs Handel’s 102. Rosenkranz was exceptionally aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Regarding the service games, Rosenkranz recorded 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Mats Rosenkranz was very efficient on serve to win 86% (51/59) of his 1st serve and 53% (17/32) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Rosenkranz broke Handel once after converting 7% of his break points (1/14).
Rosenkranz has won exactly 50% of his matches (236-234) in the last 8 years. 19-9 on indoor hard courts in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Rosenkranz has a compiled64-48 record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
The German’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25+H Plaisir and M15 Danderyd.
The German has an aggregate 28-29 win-loss record in 2023, 19-9 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Hamburg Challenger
Daniel Masur
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-12 | 1-2 | 5-3 | 16-4 | 1-2 | 12-1 |
| 2023 | 34-24 | 7-8 | 9-7 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 9-3 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 7-8 | 5-6 | 4-9 | 5-3 | 4-2 |
| 2021 | 28-26 | 4-4 | 1-7 | 15-12 | 3-2 | 5-1 |
| 2020 | 15-14 | 3-2 | 2-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
Ranked no. 444, Daniel got to the qualifications after defeating Andrew Paulson 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The German had a good straight sets win against Paulson (6-3 6-2). During the match Masur scored 54 points vs Paulson’s 32. Masur was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Masur struck 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Daniel Masur was quite effective on serve to win 90% (28/31) of his 1st serve and 67% (8/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The German broke Paulson 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Daniel’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Nussloch and M15 Oberhaching.
The German has an overall 29-19 win-loss record in 2023, 8-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Rosenkranz | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 17 |
| Pts | 111-102 | 54-32 |
| Total Points | 213 | 86 |
| Winners | 51 | 28 |
| %Winners | 46% | 52% |
Both Rosenkranz and Masur played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Mats Rosenkranz surrendered 1 set while Daniel Masur hasn’t lost a set so far. Rosenkranz has played 1 set more than Masur (3 vs 2). Therefore, Rosenkranz played 16 games more than Masur. Rosenkranz scored 51 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The German bagged 28 winners (52%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Rosenkranz | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 5 |
| 1st in | 59/91 | 31/43 |
| %1st in | 65% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 51/59 | 28/31 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 90% |
| 2nd pts | 17/32 | 8/12 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 67% |
Rosenkranz scored 8 aces . Masur made 5 aces . Rosenkranz won 86% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Masur won 90% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Rosenkranz | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 3 |
| Converted | 1/14 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 7% | 60% |
| Conceded | 3 | 0 |
| Saved | 2 | 0 |
| % Saved | 67% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Rosenkranz broke his opponent once with a 7% conversion rate. Mats dropped his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Masur broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Daniel was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Rosenkranz | |||
| Q1 Handel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-62 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 111-102 | 111-102 | |
| Total points | 213 | 213 | |
| Winners | 51 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 59/91 | 59/91 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 51/59 | 51/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/32 | 17/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/14 | 1/14 | |
| Converted % | 7% | 7% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Masur | |||
| Q1 Paulson |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 54-32 | 54-32 | |
| Total points | 86 | 86 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 31/43 | 31/43 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 28/31 | 28/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 8/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWLWWL
LWLLWWLWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Norbert GombosGombos – Marvin MoellerMoeller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Jakob SchnaitterSchnaitter (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas GerchGerch – Hady HabibHabib (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Akira SantillanSantillan – Khumoun SultanovSultanov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Mate ValkuszValkusz (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Adam WaltonWalton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Billy HarrisHarris (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
