Brandon Holt and Christian Langmo will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Fairfield Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on TAD TAUBE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Brandon Holt who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Brandon Holt is the pick to win this match.
Brandon Holt -> 1.41
Christian Langmo -> 2.75
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Brandon Holt vs. Christian Langmo
There is no head to head record between Brandon Holt and Christian Langmo since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Brandon Holt
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-16 | 27-14 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-24 | 14-16 | 1-2 | 7-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 52-21 | 48-17 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-5 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 281, Brandon reached the 2nd round after defeating Alexis Galarneau 7-69 6-0.
In the 1st round, Holt had a good straight sets win against Galarneau (7-69 6-0). During the match, Holt scored 79 points vs Galarneau’s 63. The American was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Holt managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Brandon Holt lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Holt put 57% of his first serves in, winning 73% (30/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (14/31) on the 2nd serve. The American was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Galarneau 5 times.
Holt has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 61% of his matches (127-81). 13-15 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Holt has an overall114-68 win-loss record in the last 8 years on hard.
Holt’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Busan Challenger.
Brandon has a composed 17-20 win-loss record in 2023, 13-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Fairfield Challenger
Christian Langmo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-18 | 18-13 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-31 | 30-23 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-24 | 15-16 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-25 | 40-19 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-9 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 381, Christian got to the 2nd round after defeating Strong Kirchheimer 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Christian had a good straight sets win against Kirchheimer (6-4 6-4). During the match Langmo scored 59 points vs Kirchheimer’s 53. Christian was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Langmo bagged 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Christian Langmo was extremely effective on serve to win 79% (27/34) of his 1st serve and 52% (12/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Christian broke Kirchheimer 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Langmo’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Wesley Chapel and M15 Weston.
Langmo has a compiled 35-27 win-loss record in 2023, 30-21 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Fairfield Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Holt | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 20 |
| Pts | 79-63 | 59-53 |
| Total Points | 142 | 112 |
| Winners | 30 | 27 |
| %Winners | 38% | 46% |
Both Holt and Langmo played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Holt and Langmo have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Holt played 1 game less than Langmo. Holt scored 30 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The American blasted 27 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Holt | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 8 |
| 1st in | 41/72 | 34/57 |
| %1st in | 57% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 30/41 | 27/34 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 14/31 | 12/23 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 52% |
Holt blasted 4 aces . Langmo managed to score 8 aces . Holt won 73% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Langmo won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Holt | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/5 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 100% | 75% |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Holt broke his opponent 5 times with a 100% conversion rate. Brandon conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Christian conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Holt | |||
| R1 Galarneau |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-69 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 79-63 | 79-63 | |
| Total points | 142 | 142 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 41/72 | 41/72 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 30/41 | 30/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/31 | 14/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/5 | 5/5 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Langmo | |||
| R1 Kirchheimer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 59-53 | 59-53 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 34/57 | 34/57 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 27/34 | 27/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/23 | 12/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWWLWWL
LWWLWLWWWL Tennis Scores in Fairfield Challenger
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri (3-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (7-69 6-0) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (6-2 6-79 6-4) – See score progression
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Ozan BarisBaris (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Keegan SmithSmith (7-63 7-64) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Adam WaltonWalton (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Denis KudlaKudla (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Bernard TomicTomic (6-3 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Alfredo PerezPerez (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Alex MichelsenMichelsen – Aziz DougazDougaz (2-6 7-65 6-0) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Stefan DostanicDostanic (6-3 5-7 7-64) – See score progression
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – August HolmgrenHolmgren (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Patrick KypsonKypson (3-6 7-63 7-64) – See score progression
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Vasek PospisilPospisil (1-6 6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Mark LajalLajal (1-6 7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Alex MichelsenMichelsen – Aziz DougazDougaz (2-6 7-6(5) 6-0) – See score progression
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Ozan BarisBaris (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri (3-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Adam WaltonWalton (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Denis KudlaKudla (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Bernard TomicTomic (6-3 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – August HolmgrenHolmgren (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (7-6(9) 6-0) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Stefan DostanicDostanic (6-3 5-7 7-6(4)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (1-5) – H2H and prediction
- Skander MansouriMansouri – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-1) – H2H and prediction
