Strong Kirchheimer and Ethan Quinn will face off in the qualifications of the Fairfield Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on EVE ZIMMERMAN COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ethan Quinn who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ethan Quinn is the pick to win this match.
Ethan Quinn -> 1.45
Strong Kirchheimer -> 2.61
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Strong Kirchheimer vs. Ethan Quinn
There is no head to head record between Strong Kirchheimer and Ethan Quinn since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Strong Kirchheimer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-15 | 8-7 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-29 | 19-16 | 2-4 | 17-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-30 | 17-12 | 7-11 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-21 | 12-15 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 390, the American reached the qualifications after beating Evan Burnett 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Strong had a good straight sets win against Burnett (6-2 6-2). During the match, Kirchheimer scored 55 points vs Burnett’s 30. Kirchheimer was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kirchheimer bagged 5 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults. Strong Kirchheimer was quite efficient on serve to win 82% (23/28) of his 1st serve and 100% (9/9) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Strong broke Burnett 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Kirchheimer has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (232-178). 18-15 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kirchheimer has an aggregate120-98 record in the last 8 years on hard.
Strong’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Montreal and M15 South Bend.
Strong has a compiled 33-25 win-loss record in 2023, 18-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Fairfield Challenger
Ethan Quinn
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-19 | 10-8 | 2-7 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 466, the American got to the qualifications after defeating Kiranpal Pannu 6-2 6-75 6-4.
In the qualifications, Quinn defeated Pannu (6-2 6-75 6-4). During the match Quinn scored 116 points vs Pannu’s 100. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Quinn recorded 7 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Ethan Quinn lost the serve 4 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Quinn put 52% of his first serves in, winning 69% (33/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (23/44) on the 2nd serve. Quinn broke Pannu 7 times after converting 50% of his break points (7/14).
The American’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Wichita.
The American has a composed 13-12 win-loss record in 2023, 12-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Fairfield Challenger
Ethan has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kirchheimer | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 31 |
| Pts | 55-30 | 116-100 |
| Total Points | 85 | 216 |
| Winners | 23 | 33 |
| %Winners | 42% | 28% |
Both Kirchheimer and Quinn played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Ethan Quinn surrendered 1 set while Strong Kirchheimer hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Kirchheimer has played 1 set(s) less than Quinn (2 vs 3). Therefore, Kirchheimer played 15 games less than Quinn. Kirchheimer scored 23 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Quinn blasted 33 winners (28%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kirchheimer | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 7 |
| 1st in | 28/37 | 48/92 |
| %1st in | 76% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 23/28 | 33/48 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 9/9 | 23/44 |
| %2nd pts | 100% | 52% |
Kirchheimer blasted 5 aces . Quinn struck 7 aces . Kirchheimer won 82% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 100% of the points. On the other side, Quinn won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kirchheimer | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 7 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 7/14 |
| % Converted | 44% | 50% |
| Conceded | 0 | 8 |
| Saved | 0 | 4 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Strong broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Ethan broke his opponent 7 times with a 50% conversion rate. Quinn conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kirchheimer | |||
| Q1 Burnett |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 55-30 | 55-30 | |
| Total points | 85 | 85 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 28/37 | 28/37 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 23/28 | 23/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/9 | 9/9 | |
| % 2nd pts | 100% | 100% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Quinn | |||
| Q1 Pannu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-75 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 116-100 | 116-100 | |
| Total points | 216 | 216 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 48/92 | 48/92 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 33/48 | 33/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/44 | 23/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/14 | 7/14 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 4/8 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLWWL
LWWWLWWWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Brayden SchnurSchnur (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Brandon HoltHolt (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Colin MarkesMarkes – Alfredo PerezPerez (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
