Alfredo Perez and Colin Markes will square off in the qualifications of the Fairfield Challenger for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on KENNEDY-GROSSMAN COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alfredo Perez who should win in 2 sets.
Alfredo Perez -> 1.363
Colin Markes -> 2.94
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Alfredo Perez vs. Colin Markes
This will be the 4th time that Alfredo Perez and Colin Markes square off. The head to head is 3-0
for Perez (see full H2H stats), 3-0 on hard.The last time that they locked horns, Perez won 3-6 7-5 6-3 in the qualifications in the Fairfield Challenger back in 2022.
Alfredo Perez
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 17-8 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 29-25 | 18-16 | 0-0 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 35-22 | 22-11 | 9-9 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 20-12 | 20-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 10-3 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 495, Perez reached the qualifications after beating Garrett Johns 6-2 7-62.
In the qualifications, Perez had a good straight sets win against Johns (6-2 7-62). During the match, Perez scored 76 points vs Johns’s 62. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Perez scored just 1 ace throughout the encounter and he committed only 2 double faults. Alfredo Perez lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Perez put 59% of his first serves in, winning 66% (23/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 63% (15/24) on the 2nd serve. Perez broke Johns 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Perez has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 62% of his matches (133-80). 17-15 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Perez has an aggregate101-57 record in the last 8 years on hard.
Perez’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Lakewood.
Alfredo has an overall 25-21 win-loss record in 2023, 17-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Fairfield Challenger
Colin Markes
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 24-34 | 18-20 | 3-7 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 51-33 | 47-28 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 17-8 | 17-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 768, Colin got to the qualifications after beating Clement Chidekh 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Colin had a good straight sets win against Chidekh (6-4 6-2). During the match Markes scored 66 points vs Chidekh’s 51. Markes was exceptionally aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about serving, Markes scored 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Colin Markes was very efficient on serve to win 75% (18/24) of his 1st serve and 68% (15/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Markes broke Chidekh 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
The American has a composed 17-26 win-loss record in 2023, 14-16 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Fairfield Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Perez | Markes |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 21 | 18 |
Pts | 76-62 | 66-51 |
Total Points | 138 | 117 |
Winners | 23 | 18 |
%Winners | 30% | 27% |
Both Perez and Markes played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Perez and Markes have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Perez played 3 games more than Markes. Alfredo scored 23 winners (30% of the total points). On the other side, Colin made 18 winners (27%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Perez | Markes |
---|---|---|
Aces | 1 | 3 |
Avg per match | 1 | 3 |
1st in | 35/59 | 24/46 |
%1st in | 59% | 52% |
1st pts | 23/35 | 18/24 |
%1st pts | 66% | 75% |
2nd pts | 15/24 | 15/22 |
%2nd pts | 63% | 68% |
Perez scored 1 ace . Markes also blasted 3 aces . Perez won 66% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Markes won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Perez | Markes |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 4 |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/12 |
% Converted | 50% | 33% |
Conceded | 2 | 1 |
Saved | 0 | 0 |
% Saved | 0% | 0% |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Alfredo broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Perez conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Colin broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
Perez | |||
Q1 Johns | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 7-62 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
pts | 76-62 | 76-62 | |
Total points | 138 | 138 | |
Winners | 23 | 23 | |
%Winners | 30% | 30% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 35/59 | 35/59 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 23/35 | 23/35 | |
% 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
2nd pts | 15/24 | 15/24 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Markes | |||
Q1 Chidekh | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 66-51 | 66-51 | |
Total points | 117 | 117 | |
Winners | 18 | 18 | |
%Winners | 27% | 27% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 24/46 | 24/46 | |
% 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
1st pts | 18/24 | 18/24 | |
% 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 15/22 | 15/22 | |
% 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Brayden SchnurSchnur (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Brandon HoltHolt (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Colin MarkesMarkes – Alfredo PerezPerez (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – (0-0) – H2H and prediction