Franco Agamenone and Luka Mikrut will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Lisbon Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:30 pm on ESTÁDIO CIF. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Franco Agamenone who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Franco Agamenone is the pick to win this match.
Franco Agamenone -> 1.32
Luka Mikrut -> 3.16
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Franco Agamenone vs. Luka Mikrut
There is no head to head record between Franco Agamenone and Luka Mikrut since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Franco Agamenone
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-13 | 1-4 | 9-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-29 | 0-3 | 24-24 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-32 | 6-3 | 26-24 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 81-23 | 21-5 | 60-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-8 | 0-0 | 22-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 204, Agamenone reached the 2nd round after defeating Matteo Gigante 6-4 7-64.
In the 1st round, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Gigante (6-4 7-64). During the match, Agamenone scored 87 points vs Gigante’s 75. Franco was very aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about the service games, Agamenone scored just 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Franco Agamenone lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Agamenone put 69% of his first serves in, winning 69% (38/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 68% (17/25) on the 2nd serve. Franco broke Gigante twice after converting 20% of his break points (2/10).
Agamenone has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (335-210). 19-18 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Agamenone has an aggregate 298-182 match record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Braunschweig Challenger where he beat Pavel Kotov in the final 7-5 6-3.
Agamenone has a compiled 19-23 win-loss record in 2023, 19-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lisbon Challenger
Luka Mikrut
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-11 | 4-2 | 9-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-18 | 5-3 | 28-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-14 | 9-2 | 6-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 542, the Croatian reached the 2nd round after beating Giovanni Fonio 7-64 6-3, Carlos Sanchez Jover 1-6 6-4 7-65 and Stefano Travaglia 1-6 6-2 7-61.
In the 1st round against Travaglia, Mikrut recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-2 7-61). During the match Mikrut and Travaglia scored the same amount of points (86). However, the world no. 204 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The Croatian was pretty aggressive to blast 37 winners.
About the serving games, Mikrut scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Luka Mikrut lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Mikrut put 68% of his first serves in, winning 69% (37/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (13/25) on the 2nd serve. Mikrut broke Travaglia 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
The Croatian’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Dubrovnik,M15 Sarajevo and M25 Osijek.
The Croatian has a composed 33-15 win-loss record in 2023, 28-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lisbon Challenger
The Croatian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Agamenone | Mikrut |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 80 |
| Pts | 87-75 | 248-243 |
| Total Points | 162 | 491 |
| Winners | 38 | 112 |
| %Winners | 44% | 45% |
Agamenone played 1 match while Mikrut competed in 3 matches. Mikrut started his run from the qualifications while Agamenone had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Luka Mikrut conceded 2 sets while Franco Agamenone hasn’t lost a set so far. Agamenone has played 6 set(s) less than Mikrut (2 vs 8). Therefore, Agamenone played 57 games less than Mikrut. Franco scored 38 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The Croatian fired 112 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Agamenone | Mikrut |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 3 |
| 1st in | 55/80 | 159/242 |
| %1st in | 69% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 38/55 | 112/159 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 17/25 | 37/83 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 45% |
Agamenone made 1 ace . Mikrut also managed to score 9 aces (3 per match). Agamenone won 69% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Mikrut won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Agamenone | Mikrut |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 10 |
| Converted | 2/10 | 10/21 |
| % Converted | 20% | 48% |
| Conceded | 6 | 17 |
| Saved | 5 | 7 |
| % Saved | 83% | 41% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 10 |
Agamenone broke his opponent twice with a 20% conversion rate. The Italian lost his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Luka broke his opponents 10 times with a 48% conversion rate. The Croatian conceded his serve 10 times and he saved 41% of the break points that he conceded.
| Agamenone | |||
| R1 Gigante |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 87-75 | 87-75 | |
| Total points | 162 | 162 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 55/80 | 55/80 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 38/55 | 38/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/25 | 17/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/10 | 2/10 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Mikrut | |||||
| Q1 Fonio |
Q3 Sanchez |
R1 Travaglia |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-3 | 1-6 6-4 7-65 | 1-6 6-2 7-61 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 30 | 28 | 80 | |
| pts | 67-57 | 95-100 | 86-86 | 248-243 | |
| Total points | 124 | 195 | 172 | 491 | |
| Winners | 36 | 39 | 37 | 112 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 41% | 43% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 2 | 1 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 48/68 | 57/95 | 54/79 | 159/242 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 60% | 68% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 36/48 | 39/57 | 37/54 | 112/159 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 68% | 69% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 13/38 | 13/25 | 37/83 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 34% | 52% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 5 | 3 | 10 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 5/11 | 3/7 | 10/21 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 45% | 43% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 9 | 5 | 17 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 3/9 | 2/5 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 33% | 40% | 140% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 6 | 3 | 10 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWLWLW
LWWLWWWWLL Tennis Scores in Lisbon Challenger
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (6-4 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Gilles Arnaud BaillyArnaud Bailly – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Gastao EliasElias – Nerman FaticFatic (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Alexander WeisWeis (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (6-4 5-7 6-0) – See score progression
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – Mate ValkuszValkusz (3-6 7-64 ret.) – See score progression
- Pedro SousaSousa – Titouan DroguetDroguet (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Luka MikrutMikrut – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (1-6 6-2 7-61) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Francesco FortiForti (3-6 6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Joao SousaSousa – Henrique RochaRocha (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Timofey SkatovSkatov (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Matteo GiganteGigante (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Gastao EliasElias (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joao SousaSousa – Pedro SousaSousa (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Ivan GakhovGakhov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (0-1) – H2H and prediction
