Nishesh Basavareddy and Tennys Sandgren will square off in the 2nd round of the Tiburon Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on GROSSMAN-KENNEDY STADIUM. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tennys Sandgren who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tennys Sandgren is the pick to win this match.
Tennys Sandgren -> 1.39
Nishesh Basavareddy -> 2.82
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nishesh Basavareddy vs. Tennys Sandgren
There is no head to head record between Nishesh Basavareddy and Tennys Sandgren since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Nishesh Basavareddy
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5-2 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 12-6 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Basavareddy reached the 2nd round after beating Christian Langmo 6-3 6-4, Aidan Mayo 7-5 7-5 and Abedallah Shelbayh 6-0 4-2 ret..
In the qualifications, Basavareddy had a good straight sets win against Mayo (7-5 7-5). During the match, Basavareddy scored 84 points vs Mayo’s 68. Basavareddy was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Basavareddy scored just 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 3 double faults. Nishesh Basavareddy lost the serve 4 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Basavareddy put 56% of his first serves in, winning 74% (29/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (14/31) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Mayo 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Basavareddy has a weak record in the last 2 years having won 43% of his matches (6-8). 4-2 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Basavareddy has an overall5-4 match record in the last 2 years on hard.
The American has an overall 4-3 win-loss record in 2023, 4-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tiburon Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Tennys Sandgren
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-9 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 20-19 | 0-1 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-23 | 19-11 | 1-5 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-24 | 5-12 | 1-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-13 | 7-5 | 5-3 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 200, Sandgren got to the 2nd round after beating Cannon Kingsley 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Sandgren had a good straight sets win against Kingsley (6-4 6-4). During the match Sandgren scored 63 points vs Kingsley’s 56. Sandgren was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Sandgren scored 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Tennys Sandgren lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Sandgren put 58% of his first serves in, winning 81% (26/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (9/23) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Kingsley 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
The American’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Cleveland Challenger,the Bloomfield Hills Challenger and the Lexington Challenger.
The American has an aggregate 23-21 win-loss record in 2023, 19-17 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tiburon Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2017. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Basavareddy | Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 55 | 20 |
| Pts | 202-147 | 63-56 |
| Total Points | 349 | 119 |
| Winners | 70 | 26 |
| %Winners | 35% | 41% |
Basavareddy played 3 matches while Sandgren competed in 1 match. Basavareddy started his run from the qualifications while Sandgren had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Basavareddy has played 5 sets more than Sandgren (7 vs 2). Therefore, Basavareddy played 35 games more than Sandgren. Basavareddy scored 70 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The American recorded 26 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Basavareddy | Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 3.7 | 6 |
| 1st in | 85/155 | 32/55 |
| %1st in | 55% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 70/85 | 26/32 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 40/70 | 9/23 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 39% |
Basavareddy made 11 aces (3.7 per match). Sandgren made 6 aces . Basavareddy won 82% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Sandgren won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 39% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Basavareddy | Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 12 | 4 |
| Converted | 12/28 | 4/12 |
| % Converted | 43% | 33% |
| Conceded | 9 | 3 |
| Saved | 5 | 1 |
| % Saved | 56% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 |
Nishesh broke his opponents 12 times with a 43% conversion rate. The American surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Sandgren conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Basavareddy | ||||
| Q1 Langmo |
Q3 Mayo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 7-5 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 24 | 43 | |
| pts | 67-52 | 84-68 | 151-120 | |
| Total points | 119 | 152 | 271 | |
| Winners | 24 | 29 | 53 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 25/51 | 39/70 | 64/121 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 56% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 24/25 | 29/39 | 53/64 | |
| % 1st pts | 96% | 74% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/26 | 14/31 | 30/57 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 45% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 6 | 8 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 6/13 | 8/20 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 46% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/6 | 2 | |
| Saved % | – | 33% | 17% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 | 4 | |
| Sandgren | ||||
| R1 Kingsley |
Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | |||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | ||
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | ||
| pts | 63-56 | 63-56 | ||
| Total points | 119 | 119 | ||
| Winners | 26 | 26 | ||
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | ||
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | ||
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | ||
| 1st in | 32/55 | 32/55 | ||
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | ||
| 1st pts | 26/32 | 26/32 | ||
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | ||
| 2nd pts | 9/23 | 9/23 | ||
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | ||
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | ||
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | ||
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | ||
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | ||
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | ||
| Saved % | 33% | 17% | ||
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | ||
Head 2 Head
LWWWWLW
LWLWLWWWLW Tennis Scores in Tiburon Challenger
- Adam WaltonWalton – Vasek PospisilPospisil (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Alfredo PerezPerez (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Denis KudlaKudla (6-1 4-6 7-612) – See score progression
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex MichelsenMichelsen – Brayden SchnurSchnur (6-72 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-0 4-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Ozan BarisBaris (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Patrick KypsonKypson (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Christian HarrisonHarrison (7-66 7-5) – See score progression
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Mili PoljicakPoljicak (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Johannus MondayMonday – Laurent LokoliLokoli (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Stefan DostanicDostanic (7-63 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Alex MichelsenMichelsen – Brayden SchnurSchnur (6-7(2) 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard (7-6(4) 6-3) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Denis KudlaKudla (6-1 4-6 7-6(12)) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Alfredo PerezPerez (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Vasek PospisilPospisil (6-4 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-0 4-2 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Aziz DougazDougaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
