![Prediction And Head To Head Constant Lestienne Vs. Emilio Nava Gjnakucxr5 Prediction and head to head Constant Lestienne vs. Emilio Nava](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Constant-Lestienne-vs.-Emilio-Nava-GJnAKUcxr5.jpg)
Constant Lestienne and Emilio Nava will play each other in the 2nd round of the Alicante Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 4:30 pm on PISTA CENTRAL. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Constant Lestienne who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Constant Lestienne is the pick to win this match.
Constant Lestienne -> 1.63
Emilio Nava -> 2.18
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Constant Lestienne vs. Emilio Nava
This will be the 2nd time that Constant Lestienne and Emilio Nava play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Lestienne (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Lestienne won 7-6(4) 6-2 in the final in the Stanford Challenger back in August 2023.
Constant Lestienne
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 12-17 | 8-8 | 0-3 | 1-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 32-29 | 22-12 | 0-5 | 7-6 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
2022 | 51-27 | 25-6 | 4-7 | 18-11 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-20 | 10-3 | 4-9 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 8-14 | 2-2 | 1-5 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 94, the French player reached the 2nd round after defeating Federico Gaio 6-1 7-5.
In the 1st round, The French player had a good straight sets win against Gaio (6-1 7-5). During the match, Lestienne scored 71 points vs Gaio’s 52. Constant was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lestienne scored 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Constant Lestienne was very effective on serve to win 76% (26/34) of his 1st serve and 59% (16/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The French player broke Gaio 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Lestienne has winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (357-252). 15-10 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lestienne has an overall 74-36 record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the year was conquering the title the Stanford Challenger where he defeated Emilio Nava in the final 7-6(4) 6-2 and the St. Tropez Challenger where he overcame Liam Broady in the final 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Lestienne has a composed 21-25 win-loss record in 2023, 15-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Alicante Challenger
Emilio Nava
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 21-20 | 11-8 | 4-6 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 164, Emilio got to the 2nd round after beating Diego Barreto Sanchez 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Barreto Sanchez (6-4 6-3). During the match Nava scored 66 points vs Barreto Sanchez’s 47. Emilio was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Nava scored 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Emilio Nava was extremely efficient on serve to win 83% (29/35) of his 1st serve and 55% (11/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Emilio was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Barreto Sanchez 3 times.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Modena Challenger where he defeated Titouan Droguet in the final 6-7(5) 7-6(6) 6-4.
Nava has a composed 33-25 win-loss record in 2023, 21-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Alicante Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Lestienne | Nava |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 |
Pts | 71-52 | 66-47 |
Total Points | 123 | 113 |
Winners | 26 | 29 |
%Winners | 37% | 44% |
Both Lestienne and Nava played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Lestienne and Nava have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (19). Lestienne scored 26 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Emilio blasted 29 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Lestienne | Nava |
---|---|---|
Aces | 7 | 6 |
Avg per match | 7 | 6 |
1st in | 34/61 | 35/55 |
%1st in | 56% | 64% |
1st pts | 26/34 | 29/35 |
%1st pts | 76% | 83% |
2nd pts | 16/27 | 11/20 |
%2nd pts | 59% | 55% |
Lestienne blasted 7 aces . Nava managed to score 6 aces . Lestienne won 76% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Nava won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Lestienne | Nava |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 3 |
Converted | 4/10 | 3/3 |
% Converted | 40% | 100% |
Conceded | 5 | 3 |
Saved | 4 | 2 |
% Saved | 80% | 67% |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The French player broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Lestienne lost his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Lestienne | |||
R1 Gaio |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 71-52 | 71-52 | |
Total points | 123 | 123 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 34/61 | 34/61 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
1st pts | 26/34 | 26/34 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 16/27 | 16/27 | |
% 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Nava | |||
R1 Barreto |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 66-47 | 66-47 | |
Total points | 113 | 113 | |
Winners | 29 | 29 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 35/55 | 35/55 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
1st pts | 29/35 | 29/35 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
2nd pts | 11/20 | 11/20 | |
% 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Alicante Challenger
- Emilio NavaNava – Diego Barreto SanchezBarreto Sanchez (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Federico GaioGaio (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Dennis NovakNovak – Alex MolcanMolcan (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Benoit PairePaire – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – Alberto Barroso CamposBarroso Campos (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Mattia BellucciBellucci – Akira SantillanSantillan (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Daniel CoxCox (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Federico GaioGaio (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Diego Barreto SanchezBarreto Sanchez (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Benoit PairePaire – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – Alberto Barroso CamposBarroso Campos (6-4 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Daniel CoxCox (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (6-2 6-7(5) 6-1) – See score progression
- Mattia BellucciBellucci – Akira SantillanSantillan (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Adrian AndreevAndreev (4-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Dennis NovakNovak – Alex MolcanMolcan (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Benoit PairePaire – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Emilio NavaNava (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Maximilian MartererMarterer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Moez EcharguiEchargui (0-0) – H2H and prediction