Seong Chan Hong and Dane Sweeny will square off in the qualifications of the Shanghai Rolex Masters for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 12:30 pm on SHOW COURT 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Seong Chan Hong who should win in 3 sets.
Seong Chan Hong -> 1.54
Dane Sweeny -> 2.36
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Seong Chan Hong vs. Dane Sweeny
There is no head to head record between Seong Chan Hong and Dane Sweeny since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Seong Chan Hong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 36-28 | 24-15 | 11-11 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2024 | 28-27 | 21-20 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-27 | 14-12 | 10-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-26 | 4-7 | 23-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-15 | 9-7 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 198, the Korean got to the qualifications after beating Ergi Kirkin 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications, Chan Hong had a good straight sets win against Kirkin (7-5 6-3). During the match, Chan Hong scored 73 points vs Kirkin’s 56. Seong was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Chan Hong fired 8 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Seong Chan Hong lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Chan Hong put 55% of his first serves in, winning 67% (24/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 69% (20/29) on the 2nd serve. The Korean broke Kirkin 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Chan Hong has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (210-119). 14-12 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Chan Hong has a composed 177-82 match record in the last years on hard.
The Korean’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger,the Rome Challenger and the Tallahassee Challenger.
Chan Hong has a composed 23-27 win-loss record in 2023, 14-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Shanghai
Chan Hong has never competed in this tournament before.
Dane Sweeny
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 78-26 | 71-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 18-26 | 18-19 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-33 | 25-23 | 10-8 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 62-26 | 59-22 | 3-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-23 | 19-15 | 1-1 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 256, Dane reached the qualifications after beating Hanwen Li 7-62 6-2.
In the qualifications, Dane had a good straight sets win against Li (7-62 6-2). During the match Sweeny scored 83 points vs Li’s 65. Dane was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, Sweeny recorded 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Dane Sweeny lost the serve 5 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Sweeny put 57% of his first serves in, winning 63% (27/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (14/33) on the 2nd serve. Sweeny broke Li 7 times after converting 54% of his break points (7/13).
Sweeny’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Canberra.
The Australian has a compiled 31-28 win-loss record in 2023, 21-19 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Chan Hong | Sweeny |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 |
| Pts | 73-56 | 83-65 |
| Total Points | 129 | 148 |
| Winners | 24 | 27 |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% |
Both Chan Hong and Sweeny played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Chan Hong and Sweeny have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (21). The Korean scored 24 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Sweeny made 27 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Chan Hong | Sweeny |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 3 |
| 1st in | 36/65 | 43/76 |
| %1st in | 55% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 24/36 | 27/43 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 20/29 | 14/33 |
| %2nd pts | 69% | 42% |
Chan Hong managed to score 8 aces . Sweeny scored 3 aces . Chan Hong won 67% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 69% of the points. On the other side, Sweeny won 63% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Chan Hong | Sweeny |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 7 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 7/13 |
| % Converted | 44% | 54% |
| Conceded | 5 | 11 |
| Saved | 3 | 6 |
| % Saved | 60% | 55% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 |
Seong broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Chan Hong surrendered his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The Australian broke his opponent 7 times with a 54% conversion rate. Dane conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 55% of the break points that he conceded.
| Chan Hong | |||
| Q1 Kirkin | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 73-56 | 73-56 | |
| Total points | 129 | 129 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 36/65 | 36/65 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 24/36 | 24/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/29 | 20/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Sweeny | |||
| Q1 Li | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 83-65 | 83-65 | |
| Total points | 148 | 148 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 43/76 | 43/76 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 27/43 | 27/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/33 | 14/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/13 | 7/13 | |
| Converted % | 54% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 6/11 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 55% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Stan WawrinkaWawrinka (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Luke SavilleSaville – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Quentin HalysHalys (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marcos GironGiron – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Fabio FogniniFognini (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Richard GasquetGasquet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Sebastian OfnerOfner (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Dane SweenySweeny (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Andy MurrayMurray (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Rigele TeTe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Fajing SunSun (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Pedro CachinCachin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Benjamin LockLock (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur WeberWeber – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Steven DiezDiez (1-0) – H2H and prediction