Dominik Palan and Beibit Zhukayev will play each other in the qualifications of the Shanghai Rolex Masters for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 5:30 pm on GRANDSTAND 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Beibit Zhukayev who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Beibit Zhukayev is the pick to win this match.
Beibit Zhukayev -> 1.68
Dominik Palan -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Dominik Palan vs. Beibit Zhukayev
There is no head to head record between Dominik Palan and Beibit Zhukayev since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Dominik Palan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-13 | 8-11 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-29 | 34-28 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-26 | 38-24 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-22 | 15-9 | 9-8 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-12 | 8-11 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 293, the Czech reached the qualifications after beating Lloyd Harris 3-6 6-3 7-64.
In the qualifications against Lloyd, The Czech recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 7-64).During the match, Palan scored less points (1) than Lloyd. In fact, the world no. 293 won 100 points vs Lloyd’s. That means that Palan was more focused during the important points. Palan was quite aggressive to blast 65 winners.
Talking about the service games, Palan made 11 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Dominik Palan lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Palan put 75% of his first serves in, winning 77% (65/84) of the points behind his 1st serve and 36% (10/28) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Lloyd once after converting 25% of his break points (1/4).
Palan has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 55% of his matches (143-115). 33-25 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Palan has a composed130-93 record in the last 6 years on hard.
The Czech’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Jakarta.
Dominik has a compiled 33-26 win-loss record in 2023, 33-25 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Shanghai
Palan has never competed in this tournament before.
Beibit Zhukayev
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-13 | 6-8 | 6-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-30 | 19-16 | 1-3 | 11-8 | 2-2 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 43-30 | 33-21 | 1-2 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-21 | 13-10 | 4-9 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 302, the Kazakhstani reached the qualifications after defeating Jason Jung 4-6 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications against Jung, Zhukayev recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-3). During the match Zhukayev scored 90 points vs Jung’s 78. Zhukayev was very aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about serving, Zhukayev made 13 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Beibit Zhukayev was extremely efficient on serve to win 78% (46/59) of his 1st serve and 55% (16/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Kazakhstani broke Jung 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Beibit’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Trimbach and the Little Rock Challenger.
Zhukayev has an aggregate 25-25 win-loss record in 2023, 14-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Palan | Zhukayev |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 28 |
| Pts | 100-101 | 90-78 |
| Total Points | 201 | 168 |
| Winners | 65 | 46 |
| %Winners | 65% | 51% |
Both Palan and Zhukayev played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Dominik Palan lost 1 set, while Beibit Zhukayev lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Palan and Zhukayev have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Palan played 3 games more than Zhukayev. Dominik scored 65 winners (65% of the total points). On the other side, The Kazakhstani bagged 46 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Palan | Zhukayev |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 11 | 13 |
| 1st in | 84/112 | 59/88 |
| %1st in | 75% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 65/84 | 46/59 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 10/28 | 16/29 |
| %2nd pts | 36% | 55% |
Palan managed to score 11 aces . Zhukayev made 13 aces . Palan won 77% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 36% of the points. On the other side, Zhukayev won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Palan | Zhukayev |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 3 |
| Converted | 1/4 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 25% | 60% |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 |
| Saved | 5 | 3 |
| % Saved | 83% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Palan broke his opponent once with a 25% conversion rate. Palan conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Zhukayev broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Beibit conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Palan | |||
| Q1 Lloyd |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-3 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 100-101 | 100-101 | |
| Total points | 201 | 201 | |
| Winners | 65 | 65 | |
| %Winners | 65% | 65% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 84/112 | 84/112 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 65/84 | 65/84 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/28 | 10/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/4 | 1/4 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Zhukayev | |||
| Q1 Jung |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 90-78 | 90-78 | |
| Total points | 168 | 168 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 59/88 | 59/88 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 46/59 | 46/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/29 | 16/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWWLWLL
LLWWLLWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Stan WawrinkaWawrinka (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Luke SavilleSaville – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Quentin HalysHalys (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marcos GironGiron – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Fabio FogniniFognini (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Richard GasquetGasquet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Sebastian OfnerOfner (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Dane SweenySweeny (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Andy MurrayMurray (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Rigele TeTe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Fajing SunSun (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Pedro CachinCachin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Benjamin LockLock (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur WeberWeber – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Steven DiezDiez (1-0) – H2H and prediction
