Ons Jabeur and Marta Kostyuk will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the China Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 3:00 pm on MOON. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ons Jabeur who should win in 2 sets.
Ons Jabeur -> 1.333
Marta Kostyuk -> 3.32
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Ons Jabeur vs. Marta Kostyuk
This will be the 2nd time that Ons Jabeur and Marta Kostyuk square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Jabeur (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Jabeur won 7-6(5) 7-5 in the quarter in Adelaide back in January 2023.
Highlights Ons Jabeur vs Marta Kostyuk – Adelaide 06-January-2023
Ons Jabeur
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 15-15 | 12-8 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 16-14 | 2-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-17 | 18-11 | 11-3 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-17 | 19-12 | 17-4 | 0-0 | 11-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 48-19 | 25-12 | 13-4 | 0-1 | 10-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 7, the Tunisian reached the 2nd round after defeating Ashlyn Krueger 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Jabeur had a good straight sets win against Krueger (6-3 6-4). During the match, Jabeur scored 82 points vs Krueger’s 66. The Tunisian was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Jabeur recorded 3 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Ons Jabeur lost the serve twice and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Jabeur put 64% of her first serves in, winning 68% (32/47) of the points behind her 1st serve and 38% (10/26) on the 2nd serve. Ons broke Krueger 5 times after converting 45% of her break points (5/11).
Jabeur has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 64% of her matches (336-189). 16-8 on hard in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this competition, Jabeur has a composed 138-100 match record in the last years on hard.
Her best result of the season was conquering the title in Charleston where she overcame Belinda Bencic in the final 7-6(6) 6-4 and in Ningbo where she beat Diana Shnaider in the final 6-2 6-1.
The Tunisian has a composed 34-14 win-loss record in 2023, 16-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Beijing
Marta Kostyuk
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28-20 | 19-13 | 7-4 | 2-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 34-22 | 24-14 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-22 | 22-16 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-20 | 18-11 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-17 | 8-9 | 10-4 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 44, Marta got to the 2nd round after defeating Elisabetta Cocciaretto 1-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round against Cocciaretto, The Ukrainian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-3 6-4).During the match Kostyuk scored less points (3) than Cocciaretto. In fact, the world no. 7 won 89 points vs Cocciaretto’s. That means that Kostyuk was more focused during the important points. The Ukrainian was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Kostyuk was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 9 double faults. Marta Kostyuk lost the serve 6 times and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Kostyuk put 57% of her first serves in, winning 56% (31/55) of the points behind her 1st serve and 41% (17/41) on the 2nd serve. The Ukrainian broke Cocciaretto 6 times after converting 67% of her break points (6/9).
Her best result of the current year was winning the title in Austin where she overcame Varvara Gracheva in the final 6-3 7-5.
Marta has an aggregate 25-21 win-loss record in 2023, 21-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jabeur | Kostyuk |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 26 |
| Pts | 82-66 | 89-92 |
| Total Points | 148 | 181 |
| Winners | 32 | 31 |
| %Winners | 39% | 35% |
Both Jabeur and Kostyuk played 1 match. At the moment, Marta Kostyuk surrendered 1 set while Ons Jabeur hasn’t lost a set so far. Jabeur has played 1 set(s) less than Kostyuk (2 vs 3). Therefore, Jabeur played 7 games less than Kostyuk. The Tunisian scored 32 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Kostyuk scored 31 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jabeur | Kostyuk |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 0 |
| 1st in | 47/73 | 55/96 |
| %1st in | 64% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 32/47 | 31/55 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 56% |
| 2nd pts | 10/26 | 17/41 |
| %2nd pts | 38% | 41% |
Jabeur blasted 3 aces . Kostyuk didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Jabeur won 68% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 38% of the points. On the other side, Kostyuk won 56% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jabeur | Kostyuk |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 6 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 6/9 |
| % Converted | 45% | 67% |
| Conceded | 6 | 10 |
| Saved | 4 | 4 |
| % Saved | 67% | 40% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 |
The Tunisian broke her opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. The Tunisian lost her serve twice and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. Marta broke her opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Marta conceded her serve 6 times and she saved 40% of the break points that she conceded.
| Jabeur | |||
| R1 Krueger | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 82-66 | 82-66 | |
| Total points | 148 | 148 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 47/73 | 47/73 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 32/47 | 32/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/26 | 10/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Kostyuk | |||
| R1 Cocciaretto | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 89-92 | 89-92 | |
| Total points | 181 | 181 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 55/96 | 55/96 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 31/55 | 31/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 56% | 56% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/41 | 17/41 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 4/10 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |
Tennis Scores in Beijing
- Magda LinetteLinette – Jennifer BradyBrady (3-1 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jasmine PaoliniPaolini – Yue YuanYuan (2-6 6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko – Linda NoskovaNoskova (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Daria SavilleSaville (6-2 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Liudmila SamsonovaSamsonova – Petra KvitovaKvitova (6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka – Katie BoulterBoulter (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Elena RybakinaRybakina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Anna BlinkovaBlinkova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Ons JabeurJabeur (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maria SakkariSakkari – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xin Yu WangYu Wang – Darya KasatkinaKasatkina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova – Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Petra MarticMartic – Cori GauffGauff (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva – Caroline GarciaGarcia (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Iga SwiatekSwiatek (0-0) – H2H and prediction