Aidan Mayo and Ethan Quinn will face off in the 2nd round of the Charleston Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 3:00 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ethan Quinn who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ethan Quinn is the pick to win this match.
Ethan Quinn -> 1.7
Aidan Mayo -> 2.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Aidan Mayo vs. Ethan Quinn
There is no head to head record between Aidan Mayo and Ethan Quinn since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Aidan Mayo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7-16 | 3-8 | 4-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-28 | 24-15 | 2-5 | 20-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-25 | 27-19 | 4-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-8 | 9-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 408, the American got to the 2nd round after defeating Yassine Dlimi 6-1 3-6 7-65, Darian King 6-2 6-4 and Michael Geerts 6-4 7-66.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Geerts (6-4 7-66). During the match, Mayo scored 70 points vs Geerts’s 69. Mayo was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Mayo made 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Aidan Mayo was quite efficient on serve to win 86% (32/37) of his 1st serve and 56% (19/34) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Geerts once after converting 33% of his break points (1/3).
Mayo has a winning match record in the last 5 years having won 59% of his matches (83-58). 22-12 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Mayo has a compiled59-38 win-loss record in the last 5 years on hard.
Mayo’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Xalapa,M15 Tabasco and M25 Dallas.
The American has a composed 36-21 win-loss record in 2023, 22-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charleston Challenger
Ethan Quinn
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-17 | 7-6 | 2-7 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 493, Ethan got to the 2nd round after beating Alexis Galarneau 6-2 7-65.
In the 1st round, Quinn had a good straight sets win against Galarneau (6-2 7-65). During the match Quinn scored 78 points vs Galarneau’s 68. Ethan was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Quinn bagged 11 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Ethan Quinn lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Quinn put 60% of his first serves in, winning 70% (28/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (16/27) on the 2nd serve. Ethan broke Galarneau 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
The American’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Wichita.
Quinn has a composed 11-10 win-loss record in 2023, 10-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charleston Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mayo | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 70 | 21 |
| Pts | 257-232 | 78-68 |
| Total Points | 489 | 146 |
| Winners | 105 | 28 |
| %Winners | 41% | 36% |
Mayo played 3 matches while Quinn competed in 1 match. Mayo started his run from the qualifications while Quinn had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Aidan Mayo conceded 1 set while Ethan Quinn hasn’t lost a set so far. Mayo has played 5 sets more than Quinn (7 vs 2). Therefore, Mayo played 49 games more than Quinn. Aidan scored 105 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Quinn managed to score 28 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mayo | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 11 |
| 1st in | 140/246 | 40/67 |
| %1st in | 57% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 105/140 | 28/40 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 59/106 | 16/27 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 59% |
Mayo bagged 15 aces (5 per match). Quinn fired 11 aces . Mayo won 75% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Quinn won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mayo | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 3 |
| Converted | 7/26 | 3/12 |
| % Converted | 27% | 25% |
| Conceded | 11 | 6 |
| Saved | 9 | 5 |
| % Saved | 82% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Mayo broke his opponents 7 times with a 27% conversion rate. Mayo lost his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. Quinn conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mayo | |||||
| Q1 Dlimi |
Q3 King |
R1 Geerts |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 3-6 7-65 | 6-2 6-4 | 6-4 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 18 | 23 | 70 | |
| pts | 118-110 | 69-53 | 70-69 | 257-232 | |
| Total points | 228 | 122 | 139 | 489 | |
| Winners | 52 | 21 | 32 | 105 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 30% | 46% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 2 | 9 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 6 | 3 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 76/120 | 27/55 | 37/71 | 140/246 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 49% | 52% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 52/76 | 21/27 | 32/37 | 105/140 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 78% | 86% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/44 | 18/28 | 19/34 | 59/106 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 64% | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/14 | 3/9 | 1/3 | 7/26 | |
| Converted % | 21% | 33% | 33% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 2 | 1 | 11 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 2/2 | 1/1 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 100% | 100% | 92% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Quinn | |||||
| R1 Galarneau |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-65 | ||||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |||
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |||
| pts | 78-68 | 78-68 | |||
| Total points | 146 | 146 | |||
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |||
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |||
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |||
| 1st in | 40/67 | 40/67 | |||
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |||
| 1st pts | 28/40 | 28/40 | |||
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |||
| 2nd pts | 16/27 | 16/27 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |||
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |||
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |||
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |||
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |||
| Saved % | 83% | 28% | |||
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |||
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLLWLW
WWWWLLLLLW Tennis Scores in Charleston Challenger
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Bernard TomicTomic (6-3 5-7 7-63) – See score progression
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Mark LajalLajal (1-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Vasek PospisilPospisil (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (6-76 7-61 6-2) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Christian Harrison/Mikelis LibietisHarrison/Mikelis Libietis – Mitchell Krueger/Luis David MartinezKrueger/Luis David Martinez (6-4 3-6 11-9) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Patrick KypsonKypson (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Aziz DougazDougaz – August HolmgrenHolmgren (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat (6-74 6-3 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Michael GeertsGeerts (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Stefan DostanicDostanic – Alexander RitschardRitschard (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Skander MansouriMansouri (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Mili PoljicakPoljicak (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Laurent LokoliLokoli – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Christian HarrisonHarrison (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Stefan DostanicDostanic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Aziz DougazDougaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Laurent LokoliLokoli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Denis KudlaKudla (0-1) – H2H and prediction
