Strong Kirchheimer and Stefan Dostanic will face off in the 2nd round of the Charleston Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Stefan Dostanic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Stefan Dostanic is the pick to win this match.
Stefan Dostanic -> 1.727
Strong Kirchheimer -> 2.03
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Strong Kirchheimer vs. Stefan Dostanic
There is no head to head record between Strong Kirchheimer and Stefan Dostanic since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Strong Kirchheimer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-15 | 8-7 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-29 | 19-16 | 2-4 | 17-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-30 | 17-12 | 7-11 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-21 | 12-15 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 402, Strong reached the 2nd round after beating Carter Pate 6-0 6-1, Elmer Moller 6-1 6-3 and Toby Alex Kodat 6-74 6-3 4-1 ret..
In the 1st round against Alex Kodat, Strong had a free pass after Alex Kodat retired on a 6-74 6-3 4-1 . scoreline.
Kirchheimer has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (231-176). 17-13 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kirchheimer has a composed119-96 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Montreal and M15 South Bend.
Strong has an overall 32-23 win-loss record in 2023, 17-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charleston Challenger
Stefan Dostanic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-9 | 22-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 16-7 | 16-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 719, Dostanic reached the 2nd round after beating Evan Zhu 4-6 7-5 6-0, Stefan Kozlov 6-2 6-1 and Alexander Ritschard 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Stefan had a good straight sets win against Ritschard (6-4 6-4). During the match Dostanic scored 77 points vs Ritschard’s 69. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Dostanic scored 8 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Stefan Dostanic lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Dostanic put 60% of his first serves in, winning 82% (32/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (10/26) on the 2nd serve. Stefan broke Ritschard 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Dostanic’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Lakewood.
The American has a compiled 19-6 win-loss record in 2023, 19-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charleston Challenger
Stefan has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kirchheimer | Dostanic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 56 | 63 |
| Pts | 216-152 | 230-178 |
| Total Points | 368 | 408 |
| Winners | 94 | 94 |
| %Winners | 44% | 41% |
Both Kirchheimer and Dostanic played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Strong Kirchheimer lost 1 set, while Stefan Dostanic conceded 1 set. Kirchheimer has played 1 set more than Dostanic (8 vs 7). However, it’s interesting to notice that Kirchheimer played 7 games less than Dostanic. Strong scored 94 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The American recorded 94 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kirchheimer | Dostanic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 20 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 6.7 |
| 1st in | 116/166 | 121/201 |
| %1st in | 70% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 94/116 | 94/121 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 23/50 | 37/80 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 46% |
Kirchheimer made 15 aces (5 per match). Dostanic fired 20 aces (6.7 per match). Kirchheimer won 81% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Dostanic won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kirchheimer | Dostanic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 14 | 14 |
| Converted | 14/35 | 14/26 |
| % Converted | 40% | 54% |
| Conceded | 5 | 19 |
| Saved | 4 | 14 |
| % Saved | 80% | 74% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 5 |
The American broke his opponents 14 times with a 40% conversion rate. Strong lost his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 14 times with a 54% conversion rate. Dostanic conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 74% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kirchheimer | |||||
| Q1 Pate |
Q3 Moller |
R1 Alex |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | 6-1 6-3 | 6-74 6-3 4-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 16 | 27 | 56 | |
| pts | 53-25 | 67-45 | 96-82 | 216-152 | |
| Total points | 78 | 112 | 178 | 368 | |
| Winners | 18 | 26 | 50 | 94 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 39% | 52% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 5 | 8 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 24/35 | 30/48 | 62/83 | 116/166 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 63% | 75% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 26/30 | 50/62 | 94/116 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 87% | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 6/18 | 10/21 | 23/50 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 33% | 48% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 5 | 3 | 14 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 5/10 | 3/16 | 14/35 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 50% | 19% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/2 | 3/3 | 4 | |
| Saved % | – | 50% | 100% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Dostanic | |||||
| Q1 Zhu |
Q3 Kozlov |
R1 Ritschard |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-5 6-0 | 6-2 6-1 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 15 | 20 | 63 | |
| pts | 90-75 | 63-34 | 77-69 | 230-178 | |
| Total points | 165 | 97 | 146 | 408 | |
| Winners | 33 | 29 | 32 | 94 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 46% | 42% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 8 | 8 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 3 | 7 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 41/78 | 41/58 | 39/65 | 121/201 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 71% | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 33/41 | 29/41 | 32/39 | 94/121 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 71% | 82% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/37 | 7/17 | 10/26 | 37/80 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 41% | 38% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 3 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 6/8 | 3/10 | 14/26 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 75% | 30% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 7 | 6 | 19 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 5/7 | 5/6 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 71% | 83% | 74% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLWWL
L Tennis Scores in Charleston Challenger
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Patrick KypsonKypson (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Mark LajalLajal (1-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Christian Harrison/Mikelis LibietisHarrison/Mikelis Libietis – Mitchell Krueger/Luis David MartinezKrueger/Luis David Martinez (6-4 3-6 11-9) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Vasek PospisilPospisil (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (6-76 7-61 6-2) – See score progression
- Aziz DougazDougaz – August HolmgrenHolmgren (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Bernard TomicTomic (6-3 5-7 7-63) – See score progression
- Stefan DostanicDostanic – Alexander RitschardRitschard (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Michael GeertsGeerts (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Skander MansouriMansouri (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat (6-74 6-3 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Laurent LokoliLokoli – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Mili PoljicakPoljicak (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Christian HarrisonHarrison (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Stefan DostanicDostanic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Aziz DougazDougaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Laurent LokoliLokoli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Denis KudlaKudla (0-1) – H2H and prediction
