Cristian Garin and Lloyd Harris will clash against each other in the qualifications of the China Open for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on BRAD. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lloyd Harris who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lloyd Harris is the pick to win this match.
Lloyd Harris -> 1.49
Cristian Garin -> 2.49
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Cristian Garin vs. Lloyd Harris
This will be the 3rd time that Cristian Garin and Lloyd Harris fight against each other. The head to head is 1-1 (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Garin won 7-5 6-2 in the 1st round in Rome back in 2021.
Cristian Garin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-23 | 3-6 | 12-13 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-25 | 22-12 | 18-12 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-23 | 4-5 | 9-11 | 1-4 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-18 | 2-6 | 15-9 | 1-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-12 | 2-7 | 15-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 102, Christian got to the qualifications after defeating Jie Cui 7-5 6-2.
In the qualifications, Christian had a good straight sets win against Cui (7-5 6-2). During the match, Garin scored 66 points vs Cui’s 49. The Chilean was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Garin struck 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Cristian Garin was exceptionally effective on serve to win 84% (26/31) of his 1st serve and 56% (14/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Garin broke Cui 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Garin has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (351-226). 16-8 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Garin has an aggregate 62-54 record in the last years on hard.
The Chilean’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Noumea Challenger and the Iasi Challenger.
Garin has an aggregate 35-21 win-loss record in 2023, 16-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Beijing
Lloyd Harris
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-14 | 16-3 | 2-3 | 0-5 | 12-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-23 | 21-16 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 7-14 | 4-6 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-22 | 23-11 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 25-15 | 12-7 | 4-3 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 162, Harris reached the qualifications after beating Daniel Altmaier 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, The South African had a good straight sets win against Altmaier (6-3 6-1). During the match Lloyd scored 58 points vs Altmaier’s 43. Lloyd was pretty aggressive to blast 21 winners.
About the serving games, Lloyd managed to score 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Lloyd Harris lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Lloyd put 44% of his first serves in, winning 88% (21/24) of the points behind his 1st serve and 37% (11/30) on the 2nd serve. Harris broke Altmaier 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Lloyd’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger.
Harris has a compiled 26-19 win-loss record in 2023, 19-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Garin | Lloyd |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 16 |
| Pts | 66-49 | 58-43 |
| Total Points | 115 | 101 |
| Winners | 26 | 21 |
| %Winners | 39% | 36% |
Both Garin and Lloyd played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Garin and Lloyd have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Garin played 4 games more than Lloyd. The Chilean scored 26 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Harris struck 21 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Garin | Lloyd |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 7 |
| 1st in | 31/56 | 24/54 |
| %1st in | 55% | 44% |
| 1st pts | 26/31 | 21/24 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 88% |
| 2nd pts | 14/25 | 11/30 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 37% |
Garin struck 2 aces . Lloyd recorded 7 aces . Garin won 84% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Lloyd won 88% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 37% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Garin | Lloyd |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 6/11 |
| % Converted | 44% | 55% |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The Chilean broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Garin lost his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Harris broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The South African conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Garin | |||
| Q1 Cui |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 66-49 | 66-49 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 31/56 | 31/56 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 26/31 | 26/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/25 | 14/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Lloyd | |||
| Q1 Altmaier |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 58-43 | 58-43 | |
| Total points | 101 | 101 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 24/54 | 24/54 | |
| % 1st in | 44% | 44% | |
| 1st pts | 21/24 | 21/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/30 | 11/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 37% | 37% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLLWLL
LWWWWLWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel EvansEvans – Jannik SinnerSinner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Casper RuudRuud (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Grigor DimitrovDimitrov (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Christian GarinGarin – Lloyd HarrisHarris (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Jeff WolfWolf (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey RublevRublev – Cameron NorrieNorrie (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Tommy PaulPaul – Daniil MedvedevMedvedev (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo HumbertHumbert – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Andy MurrayMurray (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (1-1) – H2H and prediction
