Strong Kirchheimer and Elmer Moller will face off in the qualifications of the Charleston Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Strong Kirchheimer who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Strong Kirchheimer is the pick to win this match.
Strong Kirchheimer -> 1.65
Elmer Moller -> 2.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Strong Kirchheimer vs. Elmer Moller
There is no head to head record between Strong Kirchheimer and Elmer Moller since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Strong Kirchheimer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-15 | 8-7 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-29 | 19-16 | 2-4 | 17-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-30 | 17-12 | 7-11 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-21 | 12-15 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 402, Kirchheimer got to the qualifications after beating Carter Pate 6-0 6-1.
In the qualifications, Kirchheimer had a good straight sets win against Pate (6-0 6-1). During the match, Kirchheimer scored 53 points vs Pate’s 25. Strong was quite aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kirchheimer blasted 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Strong Kirchheimer was exceptionally effective on serve to win 75% (18/24) of his 1st serve and 64% (7/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Pate 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Kirchheimer has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (229-176). 15-13 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kirchheimer has an overall117-96 win-loss record in the last 8 years on hard.
Strong’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Montreal and M15 South Bend.
Strong has an overall 30-23 win-loss record in 2023, 15-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charleston Challenger
Elmer Moller
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-12 | 3-2 | 26-8 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-21 | 14-11 | 31-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-15 | 10-5 | 12-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-9 | 8-4 | 2-4 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 404 (career-high), Elmer reached the qualifications after beating Eero Vasa 7-5 6-74 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Dane defeated Vasa (7-5 6-74 6-4).During the match Moller scored less points (1) than Vasa. In fact, the world no. 402 won 110 points vs Vasa’s. That means that Moller was more focused during the important points. Elmer was pretty aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Moller fired 6 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Overall, Elmer Moller was pretty efficient on serve to win 72% (34/47) of his 1st serve and 59% (32/54) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Dane broke Vasa 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Moller’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Constanta,M25 Risskov/Aarhus,M15 Alkmaar,M15 Vejle and M15 Eindhoven.
The Dane has an overall 40-15 win-loss record in 2023, 8-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charleston Challenger
The Dane has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kirchheimer | Moller |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 35 |
| Pts | 53-25 | 110-111 |
| Total Points | 78 | 221 |
| Winners | 18 | 34 |
| %Winners | 34% | 31% |
Both Kirchheimer and Moller played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Elmer Moller conceded 1 set while Strong Kirchheimer hasn’t lost a set so far. Kirchheimer has played 1 set(s) less than Moller (2 vs 3). Therefore, Kirchheimer played 22 games less than Moller. The American scored 18 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The Dane fired 34 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kirchheimer | Moller |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 6 |
| 1st in | 24/35 | 47/101 |
| %1st in | 69% | 47% |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 34/47 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 32/54 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 59% |
Kirchheimer blasted 2 aces . Moller managed to score 6 aces . Kirchheimer won 75% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Moller won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kirchheimer | Moller |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/9 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 67% | 40% |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | 0% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Kirchheimer broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. The American quite strong on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Dane broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Moller conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kirchheimer | |||
| Q1 Pate |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 53-25 | 53-25 | |
| Total points | 78 | 78 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 24/35 | 24/35 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 18/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 7/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Moller | |||
| Q1 Vasa |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-74 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 110-111 | 110-111 | |
| Total points | 221 | 221 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 47/101 | 47/101 | |
| % 1st in | 47% | 47% | |
| 1st pts | 34/47 | 34/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 32/54 | 32/54 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLWWL
LWWWWWLWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Darian KingKing – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laurent LokoliLokoli – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Emilio GomezGomez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Skander MansouriMansouri – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Stefan DostanicDostanic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Denis KudlaKudla (0-1) – H2H and prediction
