Cannon Kingsley and James Kent Trotter will square off in the 2nd round of the Columbus Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cannon Kingsley who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Cannon Kingsley is the pick to win this match.
Cannon Kingsley -> 1.65
James Kent Trotter -> 2.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Cannon Kingsley vs. James Kent Trotter
This will be the 3rd time that Cannon Kingsley and James Kent Trotter play each other. The head to head is 1-1 (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Kent won 3-6 7-5 6-4 in the quarter in M25 Wichita back in June 2023.
Cannon Kingsley
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-7 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-17 | 17-12 | 0-1 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-12 | 7-6 | 2-1 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-10 | 13-5 | 2-1 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 449, the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Alexander Ritschard 6-1 6-4.
In the 1st round, Cannon had a good straight sets win against Ritschard (6-1 6-4). During the match, Kingsley scored 57 points vs Ritschard’s 34. Cannon was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kingsley made 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Cannon Kingsley was pretty effective on serve to win 79% (27/34) of his 1st serve and 75% (9/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Kingsley broke Ritschard 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Kingsley has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 60% of his matches (84-55). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Kingsley has an overall28-17 record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
The American’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Champaign.
The American has an overall 16-10 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
James Kent Trotter
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-13 | 11-7 | 1-3 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-13 | 15-10 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-11 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 535, Kent got to the 2nd round after defeating Alexander Bernard 6-1 6-4, Elmar Ejupovic 6-75 6-3 7-63 and Emilio Gomez 6-0 4-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, James defeated Gomez (6-0 4-6 6-3). During the match Kent scored 94 points vs Gomez’s 69. Kent was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about serving, Kent blasted 18 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, James Kent Trotter was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 83% (40/48) of his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Japanese broke Gomez 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
The Japanese’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Wichita and the Granby Challenger.
Kent has an aggregate 12-7 win-loss record in 2023, 3-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kingsley | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 77 |
| Pts | 57-34 | 268-219 |
| Total Points | 91 | 487 |
| Winners | 27 | 117 |
| %Winners | 47% | 44% |
Kingsley played 1 match while Kent competed in 3 matches. Kent started his run from the qualifications while Kingsley had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, James Kent Trotter lost 2 sets while Cannon Kingsley hasn’t dropped a set so far. Kingsley has played 6 set(s) less than Kent (2 vs 8). Therefore, Kingsley played 60 games less than Kent. The American scored 27 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, James blasted 117 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kingsley | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 53 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 17.7 |
| 1st in | 34/46 | 144/229 |
| %1st in | 74% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 27/34 | 117/144 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 9/12 | 44/85 |
| %2nd pts | 75% | 52% |
Kingsley recorded 7 aces . Kent blasted 53 aces (17.7 per match). Kingsley won 79% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 75% of the points. On the other side, Kent won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kingsley | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 12 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 12/27 |
| % Converted | 75% | 44% |
| Conceded | 0 | 14 |
| Saved | 0 | 10 |
| % Saved | 0% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Kingsley broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Kingsley pretty effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. James broke his opponents 12 times with a 44% conversion rate. The Japanese conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kingsley | |||
| R1 Ritschard |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 57-34 | 57-34 | |
| Total points | 91 | 91 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 34/46 | 34/46 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 27/34 | 27/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/12 | 9/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Kent | |||||
| Q1 Bernard |
Q3 Ejupovic |
R1 Gomez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | 6-75 6-3 7-63 | 6-0 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 35 | 25 | 77 | |
| pts | 60-39 | 114-111 | 94-69 | 268-219 | |
| Total points | 99 | 225 | 163 | 487 | |
| Winners | 23 | 54 | 40 | 117 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 47% | 43% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 27 | 18 | 53 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 29/49 | 67/106 | 48/74 | 144/229 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 63% | 65% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 23/29 | 54/67 | 40/48 | 117/144 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 81% | 83% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/20 | 20/39 | 15/26 | 44/85 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 51% | 58% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 3/12 | 4/9 | 12/27 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 25% | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 6 | 5 | 14 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 5/6 | 4/5 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 83% | 80% | 196% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLWLWWW
LWWWWWLWWL Tennis Scores in Columbus Challenger
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Adam WaltonWalton (4-6 6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Denis KudlaKudla – Michael GeertsGeerts (7-5 3-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (7-60 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Laurent LokoliLokoli – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Denis KudlaKudla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
