Albert Ramos-Vinolas and Petr Nouza will square off in the 2nd round of the Bad Waltersdorf Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 4:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Albert Ramos-Vinolas who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Albert Ramos-Vinolas is the pick to win this match.
Albert Ramos-Vinolas -> 1.285
Petr Nouza -> 3.38
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs. Petr Nouza
There is no head to head record between Albert Ramos-Vinolas and Petr Nouza since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-32 | 0-2 | 28-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-37 | 1-8 | 30-24 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-28 | 4-7 | 21-15 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-26 | 5-8 | 19-12 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-14 | 2-3 | 7-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 97, the Spaniard reached the 2nd round after defeating Joel Schwaerzler 4-6 6-1 6-3.
In the 1st round against Schwaerzler, Ramos-Vinolas recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-1 6-3). During the match, Ramos-Vinolas scored 85 points vs Schwaerzler’s 64. Ramos-Vinolas was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ramos-Vinolas bagged 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Albert Ramos-Vinolas was pretty efficient on serve to win 89% (34/38) of his 1st serve and 58% (18/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Ramos-Vinolas broke Schwaerzler 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Ramos-Vinolas has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (318-284). 20-20 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Ramos-Vinolas has an overall 248-158 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Albert’s best result of the year was getting to the final in Gstaad.
The Spaniard has a composed 20-30 win-loss record in 2023, 20-20 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bad Waltersdorf Challenger
The Spaniard has never competed in this tournament before.
Petr Nouza
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 12-12 | 3-2 | 8-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 20-13 | 0-2 | 13-7 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 9-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
Ranked no. 770, the Czech got to the 2nd round after defeating Tim Handel 7-5 6-2, Maks Kasnikowski 3-6 6-3 6-3 and Franco Agamenone 7-5 6-73 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Czech defeated Agamenone (7-5 6-73 6-3). During the match Nouza scored 117 points vs Agamenone’s 109. Petr was exceptionally aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about serving, Nouza scored 10 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Overall, Petr Nouza was exceptionally effective on serve to win 74% (45/61) of his 1st serve and 51% (21/41) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Nouza broke Agamenone 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Nouza has a compiled 11-8 win-loss record in 2023, 8-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ramos-Vinolas | Nouza |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 81 |
| Pts | 85-64 | 287-261 |
| Total Points | 149 | 548 |
| Winners | 34 | 122 |
| %Winners | 40% | 43% |
Ramos-Vinolas played 1 match while Nouza competed in 3 matches. Nouza started his run from the qualifications while Ramos-Vinolas had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Albert Ramos-Vinolas surrendered 1 set, while Petr Nouza lost 2 sets. Ramos-Vinolas has played 5 set(s) less than Nouza (3 vs 8). Therefore, Ramos-Vinolas played 55 games less than Nouza. Ramos-Vinolas scored 34 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Czech struck 122 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ramos-Vinolas | Nouza |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 32 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 10.7 |
| 1st in | 38/69 | 165/273 |
| %1st in | 55% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 34/38 | 122/165 |
| %1st pts | 89% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 18/31 | 51/108 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 47% |
Ramos-Vinolas struck 3 aces . Nouza made 32 aces (10.7 per match). Ramos-Vinolas won 89% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Nouza won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ramos-Vinolas | Nouza |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 13 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 13/27 |
| % Converted | 57% | 48% |
| Conceded | 4 | 22 |
| Saved | 3 | 17 |
| % Saved | 75% | 77% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 5 |
Albert broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Ramos-Vinolas surrendered his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. The Czech broke his opponents 13 times with a 48% conversion rate. The Czech conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 77% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ramos-Vinolas | |||
| R1 Schwaerzler |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 85-64 | 85-64 | |
| Total points | 149 | 149 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/69 | 38/69 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 34/38 | 34/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/31 | 18/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Nouza | |||||
| Q1 Handel |
Q3 Kasnikowski |
R1 Agamenone |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | 7-5 6-73 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 27 | 34 | 81 | |
| pts | 79-64 | 91-88 | 117-109 | 287-261 | |
| Total points | 143 | 179 | 226 | 548 | |
| Winners | 33 | 44 | 45 | 122 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 48% | 38% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 13 | 9 | 10 | 32 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 5 | 7 | 16 | |
| 1st in | 47/75 | 57/96 | 61/102 | 165/273 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 59% | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 33/47 | 44/57 | 45/61 | 122/165 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 77% | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/28 | 14/39 | 21/41 | 51/108 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 36% | 51% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 5 | 13 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/7 | 5/10 | 13/27 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 57% | 50% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 9 | 7 | 22 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 7/9 | 5/7 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 78% | 71% | 232% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLLWWW
LLW Tennis Scores in Bad Waltersdorf Challenger
- Dennis NovakNovak – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Francesco PassaroPassaro (2-6 6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Zdenek KolarKolar (2-6 6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jozef KovalikJozef – Ergi KirkinErgi (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Petr NouzaNouza (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Ergi KirkinKirkin (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Dennis NovakNovak (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Marvin MoellerMoeller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Fabio FogniniFognini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
