Michael Mmoh and Eliakim Coulibaly will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the St. Tropez Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4:30 pm on CENTRAL TAG HEUER. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Michael Mmoh who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Michael Mmoh is the pick to win this match.
Michael Mmoh -> 1.161
Eliakim Coulibaly -> 4.7
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Michael Mmoh vs. Eliakim Coulibaly
There is no head to head record between Michael Mmoh and Eliakim Coulibaly since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Michael Mmoh
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-12 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-21 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-29 | 18-12 | 8-7 | 17-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-18 | 14-11 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-9 | 6-5 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 94, Michael reached the 2nd round after beating Jesper De Jong 6-4 1-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Mmoh defeated De Jong (6-4 1-6 6-4).During the match, Mmoh scored less points (2) than De Jong. In fact, the world no. 94 won 84 points vs De Jong’s. That means that Mmoh was more focused during the important points. Mmoh was quite aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mmoh blasted 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Michael Mmoh lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Mmoh put 60% of his first serves in, winning 74% (35/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (14/31) on the 2nd serve. Mmoh broke De Jong 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Mmoh has good record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (268-187). 18-11 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Mmoh has an overall 171-112 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Mmoh has an aggregate 21-15 win-loss record in 2023, 18-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the St. Tropez Challenger
Mmoh has never competed in this tournament before.
Eliakim Coulibaly
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-14 | 12-7 | 7-4 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-23 | 36-17 | 0-0 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-16 | 32-10 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-11 | 28-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 470, Coulibaly reached the 2nd round after beating Valentin Royer 6-4 4-6 6-4 and Antoine Escoffier 6-4 6-72 6-2.
In the 1st round, Coulibaly defeated Escoffier (6-4 6-72 6-2). During the match Coulibaly scored 103 points vs Escoffier’s 99. Coulibaly was very aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about serving, Coulibaly managed to score 6 aces and he was not very solid on his 2nd serve to score 10 double faults. Eliakim Coulibaly lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Coulibaly put 59% of his first serves in, winning 79% (44/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (19/39) on the 2nd serve. Eliakim broke Escoffier 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
The Ivorian’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Monastir.
Coulibaly has a compiled 35-16 win-loss record in 2023, 30-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mmoh | Coulibaly |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 61 |
| Pts | 84-86 | 198-194 |
| Total Points | 170 | 392 |
| Winners | 35 | 94 |
| %Winners | 42% | 47% |
Mmoh played 1 match while Coulibaly competed in 2 matches. Coulibaly started his run from the qualifications while Mmoh had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Michael Mmoh conceded 1 set, while Eliakim Coulibaly conceded 2 sets. Mmoh has played 3 set(s) less than Coulibaly (3 vs 6). Therefore, Mmoh played 34 games less than Coulibaly. Michael scored 35 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Eliakim made 94 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mmoh | Coulibaly |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 6.5 |
| 1st in | 47/78 | 124/188 |
| %1st in | 60% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 35/47 | 94/124 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 14/31 | 32/64 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 50% |
Mmoh bagged 6 aces . Coulibaly made 13 aces (6.5 per match). Mmoh won 74% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Coulibaly won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mmoh | Coulibaly |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 6 |
| Converted | 3/9 | 6/17 |
| % Converted | 33% | 35% |
| Conceded | 8 | 10 |
| Saved | 5 | 8 |
| % Saved | 63% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. The American lost his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Eliakim broke his opponents 6 times with a 35% conversion rate. Coulibaly conceded his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mmoh | |||
| R1 De |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 84-86 | 84-86 | |
| Total points | 170 | 170 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 47/78 | 47/78 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 35/47 | 35/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/31 | 14/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Coulibaly | |||||
| Q1 Royer |
Q3 Gojowczyk |
R1 Escoffier |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | 1-6 6-4 7-66 | 6-4 6-72 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | 31 | 91 | |
| pts | 95-95 | – | 103-99 | 198-194 | |
| Total points | 190 | 0 | 202 | 392 | |
| Winners | 50 | 44 | 94 | ||
| %Winners | 53% | 0% | 43% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 0 | 6 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 10 | 19 | ||
| 1st in | 68/93 | / | 56/95 | 124/188 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 0% | 59% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 50/68 | / | 44/56 | 94/124 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 0% | 79% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/25 | / | 19/39 | 32/64 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 0% | 49% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 6 | ||
| Converted | 2/6 | / | 4/11 | 6/17 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 0% | 36% | 35% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 | 10 | ||
| Saved | 5/6 | 0/ | 3/4 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 83% | – | 75% | 158% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLLLLW
LWLWLWWWLW Tennis Scores in St. Tropez Challenger
- Harold MayotMayot – Billy HarrisHarris (6-3 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Luca NardiNardi (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Jesper De JongDe Jong (6-4 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Hugo GrenierGrenier (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Dan AddedAdded (6-0 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Hugo GastonGaston (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Eliakim CoulibalyCoulibaly – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (6-4 6-72 6-2) – See score progression
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Alexander CozbinovCozbinov (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Mattia BellucciBellucci (4-6 6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Richard GasquetGasquet (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Mathias BourgueBourgue (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Hugo GrenierGrenier (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Alexander CozbinovCozbinov (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Arthur GeaGea (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Dan AddedAdded (6-0 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Jesper De JongDe Jong (6-4 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Eliakim CoulibalyCoulibaly – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (6-4 6-7(2) 6-2) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Hugo GastonGaston (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Billy HarrisHarris (6-3 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – Elias YmerYmer (2-6 6-3 7-6(1)) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Luca NardiNardi (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Harold MayotMayot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Jules MarieMarie (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
