Alexander Cozbinov and Peter Gojowczyk will fight against each other in the 1st round of the St. Tropez Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 10:00 am on COURT 5. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Peter Gojowczyk who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Peter Gojowczyk is the pick to win this match.
Peter Gojowczyk -> 1.41
Alexander Cozbinov -> 2.75
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Alexander Cozbinov vs. Peter Gojowczyk
There is no head to head record between Alexander Cozbinov and Peter Gojowczyk since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Alexander Cozbinov
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-35 | 36-29 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-25 | 31-15 | 2-7 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-27 | 15-12 | 6-8 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-9 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 422, Alexander got to the 1st round after defeating Enzo Wallart 6-4 6-4.
Cozbinov has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 56% of his matches (158-125). 31-22 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Cozbinov has an overall124-91 match record in the last 7 years on hard.
Alexander’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Monastir.
The Moldovan has a composed 32-24 win-loss record in 2023, 31-22 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the St. Tropez Challenger
Alexander has never competed in this tournament before.
Peter Gojowczyk
27 - 17win/loss
377
39
LLWWLLWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 29-21 | 21-12 | 5-3 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 13-25 | 6-10 | 0-4 | 4-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 33-26 | 9-4 | 3-7 | 16-12 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-8 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 21-35 | 9-16 | 1-6 | 8-7 | 1-5 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 423, the German got to the 1st round after beating Alexandre Aubriot 7-65 6-3 and Eliakim Coulibaly 1-6 6-4 7-66.
In the qualifications against Coulibaly, Gojowczyk recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-4 7-66).During the match Gojowczyk scored less points (9) than Coulibaly. In fact, the world no. 422 won 83 points vs Coulibaly’s. That means that Gojowczyk was more focused during the important points. Peter was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Gojowczyk recorded 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Peter Gojowczyk was extremely effective on serve to win 72% (33/46) of his 1st serve and 51% (22/43) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 4 times. Gojowczyk broke Coulibaly twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The German started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 51% of the points he played.
Gojowczyk’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Tyler Challenger.
The German has an overall 26-17 win-loss record in 2023, 20-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cozbinov | Gojowczyk |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 52 |
| Pts | 63-51 | 167-160 |
| Total Points | 114 | 327 |
| Winners | 31 | 63 |
| %Winners | 49% | 38% |
Cozbinov played 1 match while Gojowczyk competed in 2 matches. At the moment, Peter Gojowczyk conceded 1 set while Alexander Cozbinov hasn’t lost a set so far. Cozbinov has played 3 set(s) less than Gojowczyk (2 vs 5). Therefore, Cozbinov played 32 games less than Gojowczyk. Alexander scored 31 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, The German made 63 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cozbinov | Gojowczyk |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 14 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 7 |
| 1st in | 37/53 | 83/153 |
| %1st in | 70% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 31/37 | 63/83 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 8/16 | 39/70 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 56% |
Cozbinov managed to score 4 aces . Gojowczyk managed to score 14 aces (7 per match). Cozbinov won 84% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Gojowczyk won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cozbinov | Gojowczyk |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/12 |
| % Converted | 60% | 25% |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Cozbinov broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Cozbinov lost his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The German broke his opponents 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. Peter conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cozbinov | ||||
| Q1 Wallart |
Q3 Lajal |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 15 | 35 | |
| pts | 63-51 | – | 63-51 | |
| Total points | 114 | 0 | 114 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | ||
| %Winners | 49% | 0% | 49% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | ||
| 1st in | 37/53 | / | 37/53 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 0% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 31/37 | / | 31/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 0% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/16 | / | 8/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | ||
| Converted | 3/5 | / | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 0% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | ||
| Saved | 0/1 | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | ||
| Gojowczyk | ||||
| Q1 Aubriot |
Q3 Coulibaly |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-3 | 1-6 6-4 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 30 | 52 | |
| pts | 84-68 | 83-92 | 167-160 | |
| Total points | 152 | 175 | 327 | |
| Winners | 30 | 33 | 63 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 40% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 9 | 5 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 37/64 | 46/89 | 83/153 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 52% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 30/37 | 33/46 | 63/83 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 72% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/27 | 22/43 | 39/70 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 51% | 56% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Converted | 1/7 | 2/5 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 14% | 40% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/4 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLW
Tennis Scores in St. Tropez Challenger
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Richard GasquetGasquet (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Emilio NavaNava – Mattia BellucciBellucci (4-6 6-1 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Harold MayotMayot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander CozbinovCozbinov – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Jules MarieMarie (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo HumbertHumbert – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan AddedAdded – Liam BroadyBroady (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Constant LestienneLestienne (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – Elias YmerYmer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
