![Prediction And Head To Head Strong Kirchheimer Vs. Alfredo Perez Av9eryzugd Prediction and head to head Strong Kirchheimer vs. Alfredo Perez](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Strong-Kirchheimer-vs.-Alfredo-Perez-AV9erYzUgD.jpg)
Strong Kirchheimer and Alfredo Perez will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Columbus Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 5:00 pm on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Strong Kirchheimer who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Strong Kirchheimer is the pick to win this match.
Strong Kirchheimer -> 1.63
Alfredo Perez -> 2.18
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Strong Kirchheimer vs. Alfredo Perez
This will be the 2nd time that Strong Kirchheimer and Alfredo Perez clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Kirchheimer (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they fought against each other, Kirchheimer won 7-6(3) 6-3 in the quarter in M25 Montreal back in March 2023.
Strong Kirchheimer
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 12-15 | 8-7 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-29 | 19-16 | 2-4 | 17-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 33-30 | 17-12 | 7-11 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 19-21 | 12-15 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 17-12 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 402, the American reached the qualifications after beating Kiranpal Pannu 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Pannu (6-2 6-1). During the match, Kirchheimer scored 57 points vs Pannu’s 32. Strong was very aggressive to blast 16 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kirchheimer struck 2 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults. Strong Kirchheimer was very efficient on serve to win 84% (16/19) of his 1st serve and 71% (12/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Strong broke Pannu 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Kirchheimer has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 56% of his matches (227-175). 12-5 on indoor hard courts in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Kirchheimer has an aggregate46-31 record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Strong’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Montreal and M15 South Bend.
Strong has an overall 28-22 win-loss record in 2023, 12-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Alfredo Perez
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 29-25 | 18-16 | 0-0 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 35-22 | 22-11 | 9-9 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 20-12 | 20-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 10-3 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2019 | 20-12 | 16-10 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 496, the American got to the qualifications after beating Ezekiel Clark 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, Alfredo had a good straight sets win against Clark (6-4 6-1). During the match Perez scored 58 points vs Clark’s 47. Alfredo was extremely aggressive to blast 16 winners.
About the serving games, Perez scored 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Alfredo Perez lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Perez put 51% of his first serves in, winning 62% (16/26) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (11/25) on the 2nd serve. Alfredo broke Clark 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Perez’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Lakewood.
Perez has a compiled 22-18 win-loss record in 2023, 8-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Kirchheimer | Perez |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 15 | 17 |
Pts | 57-32 | 58-47 |
Total Points | 89 | 105 |
Winners | 16 | 16 |
%Winners | 28% | 28% |
Both Kirchheimer and Perez played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Kirchheimer and Perez have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Kirchheimer played 2 games less than Perez. The American scored 16 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, Alfredo recorded 16 winners (28%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Kirchheimer | Perez |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 3 |
Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
1st in | 19/36 | 26/51 |
%1st in | 53% | 51% |
1st pts | 16/19 | 16/26 |
%1st pts | 84% | 62% |
2nd pts | 12/17 | 11/25 |
%2nd pts | 71% | 44% |
Kirchheimer scored 2 aces . Perez fired 3 aces . Kirchheimer won 84% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Perez won 62% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Kirchheimer | Perez |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 6 |
Converted | 5/7 | 6/9 |
% Converted | 71% | 67% |
Conceded | 0 | 5 |
Saved | 0 | 2 |
% Saved | 0% | 40% |
Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Kirchheimer broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Strong very solid his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Alfredo broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Perez conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded.
Kirchheimer | |||
Q1 Pannu |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
pts | 57-32 | 57-32 | |
Total points | 89 | 89 | |
Winners | 16 | 16 | |
%Winners | 28% | 28% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 19/36 | 19/36 | |
% 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
1st pts | 16/19 | 16/19 | |
% 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
2nd pts | 12/17 | 12/17 | |
% 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Perez | |||
Q1 Clark |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 58-47 | 58-47 | |
Total points | 105 | 105 | |
Winners | 16 | 16 | |
%Winners | 28% | 28% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 26/51 | 26/51 | |
% 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
1st pts | 16/26 | 16/26 | |
% 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
2nd pts | 11/25 | 11/25 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Michael GeertsGeerts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Aziz DougazDougaz (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Alfredo PerezPerez (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Robert CashCash (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – (0-0) – H2H and prediction