Bernard Tomic and Pedro Vives Marcos will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Cary 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 3:00 pm on COURT 15. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Bernard Tomic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Bernard Tomic is the pick to win this match.
Bernard Tomic -> 1.55
Pedro Vives Marcos -> 2.34
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Bernard Tomic vs. Pedro Vives Marcos
There is no head to head record between Bernard Tomic and Pedro Vives Marcos since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Bernard Tomic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-23 | 29-17 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-27 | 35-19 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-12 | 24-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-12 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 292, Bernard got to the 2nd round after beating Cannon Kingsley 7-5 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Kingsley (7-5 6-3). During the match, Tomic scored 71 points vs Kingsley’s 55. Tomic was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, Tomic made 11 aces and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults. Bernard Tomic was quite efficient on serve to win 78% (36/46) of his 1st serve and 61% (11/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Bernard broke Kingsley twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Tomic has good match record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (221-181). 26-14 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Tomic has an overall 144-88 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Tomic’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Doha.
Bernard has an overall 30-18 win-loss record in 2023, 26-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cary 2 Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Pedro Vives Marcos
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-7 | 3-3 | 6-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-10 | 13-6 | 5-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-20 | 3-7 | 18-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 15-11 | 5-6 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 680, Pedro reached the 2nd round after beating Inaki Montes-De La Torre 4-6 6-2 7-5, Cannon Kingsley 6-4 6-4 and Elmar Ejupovic 6-2 4-6 6-2.
In the 1st round, Pedro defeated Ejupovic (6-2 4-6 6-2). During the match Vives scored 88 points vs Ejupovic’s 69. Pedro was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
About the serving games, Vives managed to score 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Pedro Vives Marcos was extremely efficient on serve to win 78% (38/49) of his 1st serve and 63% (17/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Vives broke Ejupovic 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Vives’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Martos and M25 Mungia.
Pedro has a compiled 17-8 win-loss record in 2023, 12-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tomic | Vives |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 76 |
| Pts | 71-55 | 253-212 |
| Total Points | 126 | 465 |
| Winners | 36 | 104 |
| %Winners | 51% | 41% |
Tomic played 1 match while Vives competed in 3 matches. Vives started his run from the qualifications while Tomic had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Pedro Vives Marcos dropped 2 sets while Bernard Tomic hasn’t conceded a set so far. Tomic has played 6 set(s) less than Vives (2 vs 8). Therefore, Tomic played 55 games less than Vives. Tomic scored 36 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, The Spaniard fired 104 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tomic | Vives |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 19 |
| Avg per match | 11 | 6.3 |
| 1st in | 46/64 | 140/226 |
| %1st in | 72% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 36/46 | 104/140 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 11/18 | 49/86 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 57% |
Tomic managed to score 11 aces . Vives managed to score 19 aces (6.3 per match). Tomic won 78% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Vives won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tomic | Vives |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 12 |
| Converted | 2/6 | 12/21 |
| % Converted | 33% | 57% |
| Conceded | 2 | 12 |
| Saved | 2 | 7 |
| % Saved | 100% | 58% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
Bernard broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. Tomic had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 2 break points. Pedro broke his opponents 12 times with a 57% conversion rate. Pedro conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tomic | |||
| R1 Kingsley |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 71-55 | 71-55 | |
| Total points | 126 | 126 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 46/64 | 46/64 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 36/46 | 36/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/18 | 11/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Vives | |||||
| Q1 Montes-De La Torre |
Q3 Kingsley |
R1 Ejupovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-2 7-5 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 20 | 26 | 76 | |
| pts | 105-90 | 60-53 | 88-69 | 253-212 | |
| Total points | 195 | 113 | 157 | 465 | |
| Winners | 34 | 32 | 38 | 104 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 53% | 43% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 5 | 8 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 46/91 | 45/59 | 49/76 | 140/226 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 76% | 64% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 34/46 | 32/45 | 38/49 | 104/140 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 71% | 78% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 26/45 | 6/14 | 17/27 | 49/86 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 43% | 63% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/5 | 4/9 | 12/21 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 80% | 44% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 2 | 4 | 12 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 0/2 | 3/4 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 0% | 75% | 142% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWLWW
LLWLWLWWWL Tennis Scores in Cary 2 Challenger
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Christian HarrisonHarrison (6-1 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Toby SamuelSamuel – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (7-5 6-76 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alex MichelsenAlex – Strong KirchheimerStrong (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Patrick KypsonKypson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Vives MarcosVives Marcos – Bernard TomicTomic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Christian LangmoLangmo (3-0) – H2H and prediction
