![Prediction And Head To Head Christopher O Connell Vs. Terence Atmane Ryojeyzrbx Prediction and head to head Christopher O Connell vs. Terence Atmane](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Christopher-O-Connell-vs.-Terence-Atmane-ryOjeyZRBX.jpg)
Christopher O Connell and Terence Atmane will square off in the quarter of the Guangzhou Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on CENTRAL COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Christopher O Connell who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Christopher O Connell is the pick to win this match.
Christopher O Connell -> 1.23
Terence Atmane -> 3.94
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Christopher O Connell vs. Terence Atmane
There is no head to head record between Christopher O Connell and Terence Atmane since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Christopher O Connell
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 11-12 | 9-8 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-34 | 19-18 | 11-9 | 4-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 50-25 | 30-16 | 12-5 | 3-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 22-16 | 14-9 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 12-12 | 4-5 | 4-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 53 (career-high), Christopher got to the quarter after defeating Dominik Palan 7-66 6-2 and Arjun Kadhe 6-4 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Christopher had a good straight sets win against Kadhe (6-4 6-2). During the match, O Connell scored 74 points vs Kadhe’s 51. The Australian was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, O Connell struck 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Christopher O Connell was quite effective on serve to win 81% (25/31) of his 1st serve and 79% (11/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Australian broke Kadhe 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Australian hasn’t conceded yet a set in this tournament to conquer 57% of the points he played.
O Connell has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (351-204). 17-14 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, O Connell has an overall 152-98 match record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Shanghai Challenger where he defeated Yosuke Watanuki in the final 6-3 7-5.
Christopher has a composed 32-27 win-loss record in 2023, 17-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Terence Atmane
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 20-19 | 12-8 | 5-5 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 54-27 | 26-10 | 26-15 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 78-30 | 71-23 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 23-22 | 23-19 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 7-10 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 173 (career-high), Terence got to the quarter after beating Lorenzo Giustino 6-0 4-6 6-3 and Alafia Ayeni 7-62 7-61.
In the 2nd round, The French player had a good straight sets win against Ayeni (7-62 7-61). During the match Atmane scored 84 points vs Ayeni’s 73. The French player was exceptionally aggressive to blast 41 winners.
About the serving games, Atmane made 11 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Terence Atmane was very efficient on serve to win 75% (41/55) of his 1st serve and 56% (18/32) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The French player was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Ayeni twice.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Terence has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Zhangjiagang Challenger where he defeated Mikalai Haliak in the final 6-1 6-2.
Atmane has an overall 44-21 win-loss record in 2023, 18-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | O Connell | Atmane |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
Tot Games | 39 | 51 |
Pts | 153-116 | 166-134 |
Total Points | 269 | 300 |
Winners | 48 | 77 |
%Winners | 31% | 46% |
Both O Connell and Atmane played 2 matches. At the moment, Terence Atmane dropped 1 set while Christopher O Connell hasn’t surrendered a set so far. O Connell has played 1 set(s) less than Atmane (4 vs 5). Therefore, O Connell played 12 games less than Atmane. Christopher scored 48 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, Atmane scored 77 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
Serve | O Connell | Atmane |
---|---|---|
Aces | 14 | 17 |
Avg per match | 7 | 8.5 |
1st in | 64/106 | 101/157 |
%1st in | 60% | 64% |
1st pts | 48/64 | 77/101 |
%1st pts | 75% | 76% |
2nd pts | 31/42 | 33/56 |
%2nd pts | 74% | 59% |
O Connell made 14 aces (7 per match). Atmane struck 17 aces (8.5 per match). O Connell won 75% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 74% of the points. On the other side, Atmane won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | O Connell | Atmane |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 6 |
Converted | 6/16 | 6/10 |
% Converted | 38% | 60% |
Conceded | 2 | 10 |
Saved | 1 | 7 |
% Saved | 50% | 70% |
Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Christopher broke his opponents 6 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Australian lost his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Terence broke his opponents 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. Terence conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
O Connell | ||||
R1 Palan |
R2 Kadhe |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-66 6-2 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 18 | 39 | |
pts | 79-65 | 74-51 | 153-116 | |
Total points | 144 | 125 | 269 | |
Winners | 23 | 25 | 48 | |
%Winners | 29% | 34% | 31% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 7 | 7 | 14 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
1st in | 33/61 | 31/45 | 64/106 | |
% 1st in | 54% | 69% | 60% | |
1st pts | 23/33 | 25/31 | 48/64 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 81% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 20/28 | 11/14 | 31/42 | |
% 2nd pts | 71% | 79% | 74% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/9 | 6/16 | |
Converted % | 43% | 33% | 38% | |
Conceded | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 0/0 | 1 | |
Saved % | 50% | – | 25% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Atmane | ||||
R1 Giustino |
R2 Ayeni |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 4-6 6-3 | 7-62 7-61 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 26 | 51 | |
pts | 82-61 | 84-73 | 166-134 | |
Total points | 143 | 157 | 300 | |
Winners | 36 | 41 | 77 | |
%Winners | 44% | 49% | 46% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 6 | 11 | 17 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
1st in | 46/70 | 55/87 | 101/157 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 63% | 64% | |
1st pts | 36/46 | 41/55 | 77/101 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 75% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 15/24 | 18/32 | 33/56 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 56% | 59% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 2/2 | 6/10 | |
Converted % | 50% | 100% | 60% | |
Conceded | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 4/6 | 7 | |
Saved % | 75% | 67% | 71% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Omar JasikaJasika (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Dane SweenySweeny (0-0) – H2H and prediction