Zachary Svajda and Garrett Johns will square off in the 2nd round of the Cary 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:30 pm on STADIUM. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zachary Svajda who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Zachary Svajda is the pick to win this match.
Zachary Svajda -> 1.24
Garrett Johns -> 3.74
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Zachary Svajda vs. Garrett Johns
There is no head to head record between Zachary Svajda and Garrett Johns since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Zachary Svajda
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-21 | 16-11 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-24 | 28-8 | 2-6 | 10-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-23 | 25-14 | 0-3 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-13 | 24-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-6 | 5-3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 207, Svajda got to the 2nd round after defeating Ethan Quinn 4-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round against Quinn, Svajda recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-4). During the match, Svajda scored 93 points vs Quinn’s 92. Svajda was quite aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about the service games, Svajda fired 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Zachary Svajda lost the serve twice and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Svajda put 57% of his first serves in, winning 73% (43/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (22/44) on the 2nd serve. Svajda broke Quinn 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Svajda has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 56% of his matches (106-84). 14-8 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Svajda has a compiled80-51 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
Zachary’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Malibu,M25 Wesley Chapel and the Rome Challenger.
Zachary has an aggregate 29-21 win-loss record in 2023, 14-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cary 2 Challenger
Garrett Johns
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-16 | 29-11 | 5-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-8 | 13-4 | 6-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-9 | 9-6 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 682, Garrett reached the 2nd round after beating Justin Boulais 7-5 7-68, Nathan Ponwith 7-62 6-2 and Darwin Blanch 6-2 3-6 7-62.
In the 1st round, Garrett defeated Blanch (6-2 3-6 7-62). During the match Johns scored 96 points vs Blanch’s 88. Johns was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
About the serving games, Johns struck 8 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Garrett Johns was quite effective on serve to win 79% (38/48) of his 1st serve and 59% (23/39) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Blanch twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
The American’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Monastir.
Garrett has a compiled 18-10 win-loss record in 2023, 16-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Svajda | Johns |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 76 |
| Pts | 93-92 | 258-218 |
| Total Points | 185 | 476 |
| Winners | 43 | 101 |
| %Winners | 46% | 39% |
Svajda played 1 match while Johns competed in 3 matches. Johns started his run from the qualifications while Svajda had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Zachary Svajda surrendered 1 set, while Garrett Johns conceded 1 set. Svajda has played 4 set(s) less than Johns (3 vs 7). Therefore, Svajda played 47 games less than Johns. Svajda scored 43 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Garrett recorded 101 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Svajda | Johns |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 21 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 7 |
| 1st in | 59/103 | 130/220 |
| %1st in | 57% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 43/59 | 101/130 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 22/44 | 51/90 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 57% |
Svajda fired 7 aces . Johns blasted 21 aces (7 per match). Svajda won 73% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Johns won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Svajda | Johns |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 9 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 9/26 |
| % Converted | 75% | 35% |
| Conceded | 11 | 12 |
| Saved | 9 | 7 |
| % Saved | 82% | 58% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 |
Zachary broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Zachary dropped his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded. Garrett broke his opponents 9 times with a 35% conversion rate. Johns conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded.
| Svajda | |||
| R1 Quinn |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 93-92 | 93-92 | |
| Total points | 185 | 185 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 59/103 | 59/103 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 43/59 | 43/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/44 | 22/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 9/11 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 82% | 82% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Johns | |||||
| Q1 Boulais |
Q3 Ponwith |
R1 Blanch |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-68 | 7-62 6-2 | 6-2 3-6 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 21 | 30 | 76 | |
| pts | 84-74 | 78-56 | 96-88 | 258-218 | |
| Total points | 158 | 134 | 184 | 476 | |
| Winners | 35 | 28 | 38 | 101 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 36% | 40% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 9 | 8 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 50/72 | 32/61 | 48/87 | 130/220 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 52% | 55% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 35/50 | 28/32 | 38/48 | 101/130 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 88% | 79% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 14/29 | 23/39 | 51/90 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 48% | 59% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 2 | 9 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 4/9 | 2/8 | 9/26 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 44% | 25% | 35% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 6 | 3 | 12 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 4/6 | 2/3 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 67% | 67% | 167% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLLWW
LLWWLWWWWW Tennis Scores in Cary 2 Challenger
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Jaimee Floyd AngeleFloyd Angele (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Pedro Vives MarcosVives Marcos – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (6-2 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Alex MichelsenMichelsen – Maxime JanvierJanvier (5-7 7-67 6-3) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (6-75 6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Darwin BlanchBlanch (6-2 3-6 7-62) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Toby SamuelSamuel – Brayden SchnurSchnur (6-3 6-75 6-3) – See score progression
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Aidan MayoMayo (4-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-4 7-62) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Ethan QuinnQuinn (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Pedro Vives MarcosVives Marcos – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (6-2 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Alex MichelsenMichelsen – Maxime JanvierJanvier (5-7 7-6(7) 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Donald YoungYoung – Christian LangmoLangmo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Christian HarrisonHarrison (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Michael GeertsGeerts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Vives MarcosVives Marcos – Bernard TomicTomic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
