Tung-Lin Wu and Nam Hoang Ly will square off in the 2nd round of the Shanghai Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on COURT 6. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tung-Lin Wu who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tung-Lin Wu is the pick to win this match.
Tung-Lin Wu -> 1.35
Nam Hoang Ly -> 3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tung-Lin Wu vs. Nam Hoang Ly
This will be the 3rd time that Tung-Lin Wu and Nam Hoang Ly square off. The head to head is 1-1 for Wu and Hoang Ly (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Wu won 6-2 7-5 in the semifinal in the Matsuyama Challenger back in 2022.
Tung-Lin Wu
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-28 | 32-25 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-28 | 21-21 | 4-5 | 3-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-24 | 26-14 | 6-3 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-26 | 10-10 | 2-8 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-8 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 188, the Chinese got to the 2nd round after beating Fajing Sun 7-65 3-6 6-2.
In the 1st round, Tung-Lin defeated Sun (7-65 3-6 6-2). During the match, Wu scored 102 points vs Sun’s 96. Tung-Lin was very aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Talking about the service games, Wu managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Tung-Lin Wu lost the serve 3 times and he saved 12 break points. Furthermore, Wu put 76% of his first serves in, winning 63% (51/81) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (16/26) on the 2nd serve. Tung-Lin broke Sun 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Wu has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 56% of his matches (206-164). 19-16 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Wu has a compiled152-106 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
The Chinese’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Nonthaburi 1 Challenger and the Tallahassee Challenger.
Tung-Lin has a composed 24-21 win-loss record in 2023, 19-16 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Shanghai Challenger
Nam Hoang Ly
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-16 | 28-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-23 | 18-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 59-18 | 50-14 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-4 | 22-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-4 | 7-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 417, the Vietnamese reached the 2nd round after beating Kaito Uesugi 6-4 1-1 ret., Hanwen Li 5-7 6-0 6-4 and Nick Chappell 5-7 6-4 6-0.
In the 1st round against Chappell, Nam recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-4 6-0). During the match Hoang Ly scored 100 points vs Chappell’s 81. Nam was quite aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Hoang Ly scored 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Nam Hoang Ly lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Hoang Ly put 64% of his first serves in, winning 67% (37/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (19/31) on the 2nd serve. Hoang Ly broke Chappell 6 times after converting 35% of his break points (6/17).
Hoang Ly’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Lucknow and M25 Jakarta.
Nam has an aggregate 11-14 win-loss record in 2023, 11-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wu | Hoang Ly |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 68 |
| Pts | 102-96 | 226-177 |
| Total Points | 198 | 403 |
| Winners | 51 | 90 |
| %Winners | 50% | 40% |
Wu played 1 match while Hoang Ly competed in 3 matches. Hoang Ly started his run from the qualifications while Wu had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Tung-Lin Wu conceded 1 set, while Nam Hoang Ly conceded 2 sets. Wu has played 6 set(s) less than Hoang Ly (3 vs 9). Therefore, Wu played 38 games less than Hoang Ly. The Chinese scored 51 winners (50% of the total points). On the other side, The Vietnamese fired 90 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wu | Hoang Ly |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 22 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 7.3 |
| 1st in | 81/107 | 124/187 |
| %1st in | 76% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 51/81 | 90/124 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 16/26 | 37/63 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 59% |
Wu bagged 6 aces . Hoang Ly bagged 22 aces (7.3 per match). Wu won 63% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Hoang Ly won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wu | Hoang Ly |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 14 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 14/31 |
| % Converted | 57% | 45% |
| Conceded | 15 | 16 |
| Saved | 12 | 9 |
| % Saved | 80% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 7 |
The Chinese broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Tung-Lin surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Hoang Ly broke his opponents 14 times with a 45% conversion rate. Nam conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Wu | |||
| R1 Sun |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 3-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 102-96 | 102-96 | |
| Total points | 198 | 198 | |
| Winners | 51 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 81/107 | 81/107 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 51/81 | 51/81 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/26 | 16/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 15 | |
| Saved | 12/15 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Hoang Ly | |||||
| Q1 Uesugi |
Q3 Li |
R1 Chappell |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 1-1 ret. | 5-7 6-0 6-4 | 5-7 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 28 | 28 | 68 | |
| pts | 39-31 | 87-65 | 100-81 | 226-177 | |
| Total points | 70 | 152 | 181 | 403 | |
| Winners | 13 | 40 | 37 | 90 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 46% | 37% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 13 | 5 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 21/31 | 48/70 | 55/86 | 124/187 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 69% | 64% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 13/21 | 40/48 | 37/55 | 90/124 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 83% | 67% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/10 | 12/22 | 19/31 | 37/63 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 55% | 61% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 6 | 14 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 5/9 | 6/17 | 14/31 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 56% | 35% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 3 | 9 | 16 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 1/3 | 6/9 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 33% | 67% | 150% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWLLW
LLWWWLWLLW Tennis Scores in Shanghai Challenger
- Yan BaiBai – Tao MuMu (6-3 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Antoine BellierBellier – Arjun KadheKadhe (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly – Nick ChappellChappell (5-7 6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Mikalai HaliakHaliak – Alafia AyeniAyeni (6-2 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Alex BoltBolt (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Rigele TeTe (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Dominik PalanPalan – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Luke SavilleSaville (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Mukund SasikumarSasikumar (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Omar JasikaJasika (6-3 7-61) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Robert StrombachsStrombachs (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Hanyi LiuLiu (6-1 7-64) – See score progression
- Filip PeliwoPeliwo – Marc PolmansPolmans (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Fajing SunSun (7-65 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Philip SekulicSekulic (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yan BaiBai – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip PeliwoPeliwo – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine BellierBellier – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mikalai HaliakHaliak – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
