Vitaliy Sachko and Sumit Nagal will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Tulln Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 4:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sumit Nagal who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sumit Nagal is the pick to win this match.
Sumit Nagal -> 1.81
Vitaliy Sachko -> 1.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Vitaliy Sachko vs. Sumit Nagal
There is no head to head record between Vitaliy Sachko and Sumit Nagal since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Vitaliy Sachko
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-13 | 3-3 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 47-32 | 4-3 | 28-16 | 15-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 24-33 | 2-3 | 12-18 | 8-10 | 0-1 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 42-28 | 0-2 | 24-17 | 18-7 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
| 2020 | 21-12 | 8-5 | 7-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 165, Vitaliy reached the 2nd round after defeating Lukas Neumayer 7-62 7-61.
In the 1st round, Sachko had a good straight sets win against Neumayer (7-62 7-61). During the match, Sachko scored 86 points vs Neumayer’s 74. Vitaliy was quite aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sachko made 4 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults. Vitaliy Sachko lost the serve 3 times. Furthermore, Sachko put 65% of his first serves in, winning 74% (37/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. Sachko broke Neumayer 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Sachko has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 60% of his matches (283-187). 27-13 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Sachko has a compiled177-114 match record in the last 9 years on clay.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Bratislava 1 Challenger where he beat Dimitar Kuzmanov in the final 2-6 6-2 7-6(2).
Sachko has an aggregate 43-23 win-loss record in 2023, 27-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tulln Challenger
Sachko has never competed in this tournament before.
Sumit Nagal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-14 | 15-8 | 13-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 189, Sumit got to the 2nd round after beating Daniel Masur 6-1 6-2.
In the 1st round, Sumit had a good straight sets win against Masur (6-1 6-2). During the match Nagal scored 60 points vs Masur’s 36. The Indian was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Nagal fired 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Sumit Nagal lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Nagal put 85% of his first serves in, winning 70% (23/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (3/6) on the 2nd serve. The Indian broke Masur 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Rome Challenger where he overcame Jesper De Jong in the final 6-3 6-2 and the Tampere Challenger where he beat Dalibor Svrcina in the final 6-4 7-5.
The Indian has a composed 36-22 win-loss record in 2023, 28-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sachko | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 15 |
| Pts | 86-74 | 60-36 |
| Total Points | 160 | 96 |
| Winners | 37 | 23 |
| %Winners | 43% | 38% |
Both Sachko and Nagal played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Sachko and Nagal have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Sachko played 11 games more than Nagal. The Ukrainian scored 37 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Nagal fired 23 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sachko | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3 |
| 1st in | 50/77 | 33/39 |
| %1st in | 65% | 85% |
| 1st pts | 37/50 | 23/33 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 13/27 | 3/6 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 50% |
Sachko made 4 aces . Nagal blasted 3 aces . Sachko won 74% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Nagal won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sachko | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 6 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 6/11 |
| % Converted | 60% | 55% |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Vitaliy broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Sachko surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Nagal broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. Nagal conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sachko | |||
| R1 Neumayer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 7-61 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 86-74 | 86-74 | |
| Total points | 160 | 160 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 50/77 | 50/77 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 37/50 | 37/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/27 | 13/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 0/3 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Nagal | |||
| R1 Masur |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 60-36 | 60-36 | |
| Total points | 96 | 96 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 33/39 | 33/39 | |
| % 1st in | 85% | 85% | |
| 1st pts | 23/33 | 23/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLWLLLW
LWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Tulln Challenger
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (2-6 6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Jurij RodionovRodionov (7-5 2-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Henri SquireSquire – Lucas MiedlerMiedler (4-6 6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (5-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Gerald MelzerMelzer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timo StodderStodder – Maximilian MartererMarterer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Henri SquireSquire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
