Christian Langmo and Alexey Vatutin will square off in the qualifications of the Cassis Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alexey Vatutin who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Alexey Vatutin is the pick to win this match.
Alexey Vatutin -> 1.69
Christian Langmo -> 2.08
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Christian Langmo vs. Alexey Vatutin
This will be the 3rd time that Christian Langmo and Alexey Vatutin face off. The head to head is 2-0 for Vatutin (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Vatutin won 6-3 6-0 in the qualifications in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger back in 2022.
Christian Langmo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-18 | 18-13 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-31 | 30-23 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-24 | 15-16 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-25 | 40-19 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-9 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 394, the American got to the qualifications after defeating Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Christian had a good straight sets win against Carlos Manuel Aguilar (6-2 6-4). During the match, Langmo scored 58 points vs Carlos Manuel Aguilar’s 39. Christian was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Langmo scored 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Christian Langmo was extremely effective on serve to win 92% (23/25) of his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Christian broke Carlos Manuel Aguilar 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Langmo has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 59% of his matches (176-123). 27-17 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Langmo has a compiled148-96 match record in the last 7 years on hard.
Langmo’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Wesley Chapel and M15 Weston.
Christian has a composed 32-23 win-loss record in 2023, 27-17 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cassis Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Alexey Vatutin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-18 | 0-1 | 21-8 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-27 | 5-7 | 6-8 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 38-39 | 8-3 | 19-20 | 11-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-38 | 0-1 | 15-26 | 16-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-19 | 1-4 | 1-5 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 512, Alexey reached the qualifications after defeating Daniil Glinka 5-7 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications against Glinka, Vatutin recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-3 6-4). During the match Vatutin scored 107 points vs Glinka’s 93. Alexey was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about serving, Vatutin was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Alexey Vatutin was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 72% (36/50) of his 1st serve and 51% (21/41) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 5 times. Vatutin broke Glinka 6 times after converting 35% of his break points (6/17).
The Russian’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Manacor.
The Russian has a composed 16-17 win-loss record in 2023, 4-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cassis Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Langmo | Vatutin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 31 |
| Pts | 58-39 | 107-93 |
| Total Points | 97 | 200 |
| Winners | 23 | 36 |
| %Winners | 40% | 34% |
Both Langmo and Vatutin played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Alexey Vatutin lost 1 set while Christian Langmo hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Langmo has played 1 set(s) less than Vatutin (2 vs 3). Therefore, Langmo played 13 games less than Vatutin. Christian scored 23 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Alexey scored 36 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Langmo | Vatutin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 0 |
| 1st in | 25/42 | 50/91 |
| %1st in | 60% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 23/25 | 36/50 |
| %1st pts | 92% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 21/41 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 51% |
Langmo managed to score 6 aces . Vatutin didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Langmo won 92% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Vatutin won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Langmo | Vatutin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 6/17 |
| % Converted | 50% | 35% |
| Conceded | 2 | 11 |
| Saved | 1 | 6 |
| % Saved | 50% | 55% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 5 |
Langmo broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Langmo lost his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Vatutin broke his opponent 6 times with a 35% conversion rate. The Russian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 55% of the break points that he conceded.
| Langmo | |||
| Q1 Carlos Manuel Aguilar |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 58-39 | 58-39 | |
| Total points | 97 | 97 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 25/42 | 25/42 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 23/25 | 23/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 92% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Vatutin | |||
| Q1 Glinka |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 107-93 | 107-93 | |
| Total points | 200 | 200 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 50/91 | 50/91 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 36/50 | 36/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/41 | 21/41 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/17 | 6/17 | |
| Converted % | 35% | 35% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 6/11 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 55% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLWWWL
LWLWWLLWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Daniel CoxCox (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jules MarieMarie – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Laurent LokoliLokoli – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Joao SousaSousa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas PoullainPoullain – Benjamin BonziBonzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Alexey VatutinVatutin (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Antoine HoangHoang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karl FribergFriberg – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan AddedAdded – Liam BroadyBroady (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Elliot BenchetritBenchetrit (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
