Colin Sinclair and Nam Hoang Ly will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Zhangjiagang Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 10:30 am on COURT 5. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nam Hoang Ly who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nam Hoang Ly is the pick to win this match.
Nam Hoang Ly -> 1.87
Colin Sinclair -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Colin Sinclair vs. Nam Hoang Ly
There is no head to head record between Colin Sinclair and Nam Hoang Ly since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Colin Sinclair
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-32 | 31-25 | 8-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-22 | 22-14 | 7-5 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 39-21 | 22-8 | 14-9 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-12 | 3-7 | 6-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 379, Sinclair got to the 2nd round after defeating Markos Kalovelonis 6-4 6-1 and Kaichi Uchida 6-3 3-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Australian defeated Uchida (6-3 3-6 6-4). During the match, Sinclair scored 85 points vs Uchida’s 79. Sinclair was quite aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Regarding the service games, Sinclair scored 11 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Colin Sinclair lost the serve once and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Sinclair put 64% of his first serves in, winning 81% (44/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (15/30) on the 2nd serve. Colin broke Uchida twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Sinclair has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 61% of his matches (207-131). 24-15 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Sinclair has a composed114-71 record in the last 7 years on hard.
The Australian’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Rancho Santa Fe.
Colin has a compiled 32-21 win-loss record in 2023, 24-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zhangjiagang Challenger
Nam Hoang Ly
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-6 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-23 | 18-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 59-18 | 50-14 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-4 | 22-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-4 | 7-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 417, Nam reached the 2nd round after defeating Nick Chappell 5-7 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round against Chappell, Nam recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-3 6-2). During the match Hoang Ly scored 91 points vs Chappell’s 80. Nam was very aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about serving, Hoang Ly couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Nam Hoang Ly lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Hoang Ly put 63% of his first serves in, winning 82% (45/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (15/32) on the 2nd serve. The Vietnamese broke Chappell 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Nam’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Lucknow and M25 Jakarta.
The Vietnamese has an overall 8-13 win-loss record in 2023, 8-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sinclair | Hoang Ly |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 45 | 29 |
| Pts | 147-122 | 91-80 |
| Total Points | 269 | 171 |
| Winners | 71 | 45 |
| %Winners | 48% | 49% |
Sinclair played 2 matches while Hoang Ly competed in 1 match. Sinclair started his run from the qualifications while Hoang Ly had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Colin Sinclair conceded 1 set, while Nam Hoang Ly dropped 1 set. Sinclair has played 2 sets more than Hoang Ly (5 vs 3). Therefore, Sinclair played 16 games more than Hoang Ly. Sinclair scored 71 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Hoang Ly struck 45 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sinclair | Hoang Ly |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 19 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 9.5 | 0 |
| 1st in | 91/134 | 55/87 |
| %1st in | 68% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 71/91 | 45/55 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 23/43 | 15/32 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 47% |
Sinclair scored 19 aces (9.5 per match). Hoang Ly didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Sinclair won 78% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Hoang Ly won 82% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sinclair | Hoang Ly |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 3 |
| Converted | 6/12 | 3/6 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 13 | 2 |
| Saved | 11 | 1 |
| % Saved | 85% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Colin broke his opponents 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Sinclair conceded his serve twice and he saved 85% of the break points that he conceded. The Vietnamese broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Vietnamese conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sinclair | |||||
| Q1 Kalovelonis |
Q3 Liu |
R1 Uchida |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 1-6 6-3 7-63 | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 29 | 28 | 74 | |
| pts | 62-43 | – | 85-79 | 147-122 | |
| Total points | 105 | 0 | 164 | 269 | |
| Winners | 27 | 44 | 71 | ||
| %Winners | 44% | 0% | 52% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 0 | 11 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 1st in | 37/50 | / | 54/84 | 91/134 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 0% | 64% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 27/37 | / | 44/54 | 71/91 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 0% | 81% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | / | 15/30 | 23/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 0% | 50% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 6 | ||
| Converted | 4/5 | / | 2/7 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 0% | 29% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 11 | 13 | ||
| Saved | 1/2 | 0/ | 10/11 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 50% | – | 91% | 47% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Hoang Ly | |||||
| R1 Chappell |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | ||||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |||
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |||
| pts | 91-80 | 91-80 | |||
| Total points | 171 | 171 | |||
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |||
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |||
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |||
| 1st in | 55/87 | 55/87 | |||
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |||
| 1st pts | 45/55 | 45/55 | |||
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |||
| 2nd pts | 15/32 | 15/32 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |||
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |||
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |||
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |||
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |||
| Saved % | 50% | 17% | |||
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |||
Head 2 Head
LWLW
LLWWWLWWWW Tennis Scores in Zhangjiagang Challenger
- Mikalai HaliakHaliak – Mukund SasikumarSasikumar (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Rigele TeTe – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-77 6-3 7-66) – See score progression
- Linang XiaoXiao – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-3 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Leonid SheyngezikhtSheyngezikht (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Markos Kalovelonis/Stefanos SakellaridisKalovelonis/Stefanos Sakellaridis – Jie Cui/Hanyi LiuCui/Hanyi Liu (3-6 6-3 10-4) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Luke SavilleSaville (7-63 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Filip PeliwoPeliwo – Dominik PalanPalan (6-2 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Jose StathamStatham – Hanwen LiLi (6-3 3-6 7-62) – See score progression
- Stefanos SakellaridisSakellaridis – Evan ZhuZhu (7-5 7-66) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Fajing SunSun (4-6 7-61 7-69) – See score progression
- Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly – Nick ChappellChappell (5-7 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Ricardas BerankisBerankis – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi – Jie CuiCui (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Philip SekulicSekulic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Colin SinclairSinclair – Kaichi UchidaUchida (6-3 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Arthur WeberWeber (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Robert StrombachsStrombachs – Hanyi LiuLiu (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Robert StrombachsStrombachs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Jose StathamStatham (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly – Colin SinclairSinclair (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rigele TeTe – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Linang XiaoXiao – Mikalai HaliakHaliak (0-1) – H2H and prediction
