Zsombor Piros and Sumit Nagal will square off in the 2nd round of the Como Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:00 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zsombor Piros who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Zsombor Piros is the pick to win this match.
Zsombor Piros -> 1.66
Sumit Nagal -> 2.13
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Zsombor Piros vs. Sumit Nagal
This will be the 3rd time that Zsombor Piros and Sumit Nagal play each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Piros and Nagal (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Piros won 6-2 7-5 in the 1st round in the Bratislava 1 Challenger back in June 2023.
Zsombor Piros
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-17 | 1-4 | 10-11 | 7-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-29 | 3-2 | 35-18 | 5-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-23 | 7-6 | 19-9 | 10-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-16 | 3-2 | 31-9 | 13-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-2 | 1-1 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 112, the Hungarian got to the 2nd round after defeating Louis Wessels 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round, Piros had a good straight sets win against Wessels (6-2 6-4). During the match, Piros scored 68 points vs Wessels’s 47. Zsombor was exceptionally aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Piros scored just 1 ace during the encounter and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Zsombor Piros was very efficient on serve to win 79% (22/28) of his 1st serve and 65% (11/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Zsombor broke Wessels 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Piros has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (222-128). 28-15 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Piros has a composed145-70 record in the last 8 years on clay.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Split Challenger where he defeated Norbert Gombos in the final 7-6(2) 7-6(9) and the Oeiras 3 Challenger where he overcame Juan Manuel Cerundolo in the final 6-3 6-4.
The Hungarian has an overall 38-23 win-loss record in 2023, 28-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Como Challenger
Sumit Nagal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-15 | 15-8 | 13-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 189, Sumit reached the 2nd round after defeating Riccardo Bonadio 6-4 0-6 7-64.
In the 1st round, Nagal defeated Bonadio (6-4 0-6 7-64).During the match Nagal scored less points (10) than Bonadio. In fact, the world no. 112 won 79 points vs Bonadio’s. That means that Nagal was more focused during the important points. Nagal was pretty aggressive to blast 40 winners.
About the serving games, Nagal recorded 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Sumit Nagal lost the serve 5 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Nagal put 67% of his first serves in, winning 63% (40/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (15/31) on the 2nd serve. The Indian broke Bonadio 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Rome Challenger where he defeated Jesper De Jong in the final 6-3 6-2 and the Tampere Challenger where he overcame Dalibor Svrcina in the final 6-4 7-5.
Sumit has a composed 34-21 win-loss record in 2023, 26-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Piros | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 29 |
| Pts | 68-47 | 79-89 |
| Total Points | 115 | 168 |
| Winners | 22 | 40 |
| %Winners | 32% | 51% |
Both Piros and Nagal played 1 match. At the moment, Sumit Nagal conceded 1 set while Zsombor Piros hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Piros has played 1 set(s) less than Nagal (2 vs 3). Therefore, Piros played 11 games less than Nagal. Piros scored 22 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Nagal managed to score 40 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Piros | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 5 |
| 1st in | 28/45 | 63/94 |
| %1st in | 62% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 22/28 | 40/63 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 11/17 | 15/31 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 48% |
Piros bagged 1 ace . Nagal also managed to score 5 aces . Piros won 79% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Nagal won 63% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Piros | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/12 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 33% | 60% |
| Conceded | 2 | 8 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 38% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 5 |
Zsombor broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Piros lost his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Indian broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Nagal conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 38% of the break points that he conceded.
| Piros | |||
| R1 Wessels |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 68-47 | 68-47 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 28/45 | 28/45 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 22/28 | 22/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/17 | 11/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Nagal | |||
| R1 Bonadio |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 0-6 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 79-89 | 79-89 | |
| Total points | 168 | 168 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 63/94 | 63/94 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 40/63 | 40/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/31 | 15/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 3/8 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 38% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLLLLLL
LLWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Como Challenger
- Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri – Valentin RoyerRoyer (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Louis WesselsWessels (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Edoardo LavagnoLavagno (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Miljan ZekicZekic (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Benoit PairePaire – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Luciano DarderiDarderi – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Andres MartinMartin (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Jelle SelsSels (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (6-3 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Flavio CobolliCobolli (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Lorenzo CarboniCarboni – Nerman FaticFatic (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Matteo GiganteGigante (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Fabio FogniniFognini – Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee (3-6 6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (6-4 0-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Benoit PairePaire – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Luciano DarderiDarderi – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Edoardo LavagnoLavagno (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri – Valentin RoyerRoyer (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Louis WesselsWessels (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fabio FogniniFognini – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benoit PairePaire – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Ivan GakhovGakhov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Zsombor PirosPiros (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
