Alexander Weis and Samuel Vincent Ruggeri will face off in the qualifications of the Como Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 11:00 am on TC GIUSSANO INDOORS 4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alexander Weis who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Alexander Weis is the pick to win this match.
Alexander Weis -> 1.71
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri -> 2.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Alexander Weis vs. Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
There is no head to head record between Alexander Weis and Samuel Vincent Ruggeri since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Alexander Weis
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-30 | 0-0 | 24-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-37 | 0-2 | 51-33 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 58-30 | 2-3 | 55-24 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-31 | 0-0 | 49-30 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 295, Alexander got to the qualifications after defeating Lorenzo Rottoli 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Weis had a good straight sets win against Rottoli (6-4 6-2). During the match, Weis scored 71 points vs Rottoli’s 57. Alexander was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Weis fired 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Alexander Weis lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Weis put 74% of his first serves in, winning 65% (30/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Rottoli 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Weis has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 58% of his matches (283-209). 38-25 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Weis has an aggregate269-183 record in the last 8 years on clay.
Alexander’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Muttenz.
Weis has an aggregate 38-29 win-loss record in 2023, 38-25 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Como Challenger
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-29 | 10-5 | 26-20 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 47-29 | 25-11 | 22-14 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 55-28 | 29-10 | 26-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-24 | 18-13 | 15-9 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 385, the Italian reached the qualifications after defeating Kyrian Jacquet 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Jacquet (6-3 6-1). During the match Vincent scored 69 points vs Jacquet’s 47. The Italian was pretty aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about serving, Vincent managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Samuel Vincent Ruggeri was very effective on serve to win 86% (19/22) of his 1st serve and 54% (13/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Italian broke Jacquet 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
The Italian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Sharm ElSheikh,M25 Cattolica and M25 Padova.
Samuel has a composed 34-23 win-loss record in 2023, 19-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Como Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Weis | Vincent |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 16 |
| Pts | 71-57 | 69-47 |
| Total Points | 128 | 116 |
| Winners | 30 | 19 |
| %Winners | 42% | 28% |
Both Weis and Vincent played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Weis and Vincent have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Weis played 2 games more than Vincent. Alexander scored 30 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Vincent struck 19 winners (28%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Weis | Vincent |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 5 |
| 1st in | 46/62 | 22/46 |
| %1st in | 74% | 48% |
| 1st pts | 30/46 | 19/22 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 86% |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 13/24 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 54% |
Weis blasted 6 aces . Vincent bagged 5 aces . Weis won 65% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Vincent won 86% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Weis | Vincent |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 67% | 42% |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 |
| Saved | 5 | 3 |
| % Saved | 83% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Weis broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Alexander lost his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Vincent broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Vincent conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Weis | |||
| Q1 Rottoli |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 71-57 | 71-57 | |
| Total points | 128 | 128 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 46/62 | 46/62 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 30/46 | 30/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 9/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Vincent | |||
| Q1 Jacquet |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 69-47 | 69-47 | |
| Total points | 116 | 116 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 22/46 | 22/46 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 48% | |
| 1st pts | 19/22 | 19/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 13/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLWLWW
LWWLLLWLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fabio FogniniFognini – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Louis WesselsWessels (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Moez EcharguiEchargui (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jelle SelsSels – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Edoardo LavagnoLavagno (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Calvin HemeryHemery (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Miljan ZekicZekic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Flavio CobolliCobolli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
