Juan Manuel Cerundolo and Omni Kumar will face off in the 3rd round of the Winston-Salem for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 6:30 pm on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Juan Manuel Cerundolo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Juan Manuel Cerundolo is the pick to win this match.
Juan Manuel Cerundolo -> 1.46
Omni Kumar -> 2.72
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs. Omni Kumar
There is no head to head record between Juan Manuel Cerundolo and Omni Kumar since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 25-16 | 0-2 | 25-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 41-32 | 4-2 | 37-28 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 27-17 | 3-6 | 24-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 53-26 | 0-0 | 53-22 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 19-17 | 2-2 | 17-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 100, Juan got to the 3rd round after beating Roman Safiullin 7-65 3-6 6-3 and Yannick Hanfmann 7-63 5-7 7-64.
In the 2nd round, Juan defeated Hanfmann (7-63 5-7 7-64).During the match, Manuel Cerundolo scored less points (1) than Hanfmann. In fact, the world no. 100 won 124 points vs Hanfmann’s. That means that Manuel Cerundolo was more focused during the important points. The Argentine was very aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Regarding the service games, Manuel Cerundolo scored 4 aces and he was not very steady on his 2nd serve to score 11 double faults. Juan Manuel Cerundolo lost the serve 6 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Manuel Cerundolo put 49% of his first serves in, winning 72% (44/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (29/63) on the 2nd serve. Manuel Cerundolo broke Hanfmann 5 times after converting 36% of his break points (5/14).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Argentine has conceded 2 set in this tournament to win 50% of the points he played.
Manuel Cerundolo has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 63% of his matches (190-111). 2-0 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Manuel Cerundolo has a composed7-8 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Tigre 1 Challenger where he defeated Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco in the final 4-6 6-4 6-2 and the Tigre 2 Challenger where he beat Jesper De Jong in the final 6-3 2-6 6-2.
The Argentine has a compiled 32-22 win-loss record in 2023, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Winston-Salem
Juan has never competed in this tournament before.
Omni Kumar
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 15-9 | 8-5 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 54-32 | 54-31 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 49-36 | 47-29 | 1-1 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 75-29 | 73-27 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 16-10 | 16-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 385, the American reached the 3rd round after defeating Robin Haase 6-1 1-6 7-5, Arthur Rinderknech 6-3 7-63 and Botic Van De Zandschulp 6-3 7-5.
In the 2nd round, Kumar had a good straight sets win against Van De Zandschulp (6-3 7-5). During the match Kumar scored 68 points vs Van De Zandschulp’s 63. Kumar was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
About the serving games, Kumar bagged 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Omni Kumar was very effective on serve to win 71% (32/45) of his 1st serve and 54% (15/28) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Omni broke Van De Zandschulp 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kumar started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
Kumar’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Monastir and M15 Los Angeles.
Omni has a composed 39-24 win-loss record in 2023, 39-24 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Manuel Cerundolo | Kumar |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 3 |
Tot Set | 6 | 7 |
Tot Games | 69 | 69 |
Pts | 233-233 | 212-199 |
Total Points | 466 | 411 |
Winners | 90 | 90 |
%Winners | 39% | 42% |
Manuel Cerundolo played 2 matches while Kumar competed in 3 matches. Kumar started his run from the qualifications while Manuel Cerundolo had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Juan Manuel Cerundolo lost 2 sets, while Omni Kumar dropped 1 set. Manuel Cerundolo has played 1 set(s) less than Kumar (6 vs 7). However, it is interesting to notice that they played the same amount of games (69). Juan scored 90 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The American struck 90 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Manuel Cerundolo | Kumar |
---|---|---|
Aces | 13 | 10 |
Avg per match | 6.5 | 3.3 |
1st in | 123/231 | 119/223 |
%1st in | 53% | 53% |
1st pts | 90/123 | 90/119 |
%1st pts | 73% | 76% |
2nd pts | 51/108 | 56/104 |
%2nd pts | 47% | 54% |
Manuel Cerundolo blasted 13 aces (6.5 per match). Kumar made 10 aces (3.3 per match). Manuel Cerundolo won 73% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Kumar won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Manuel Cerundolo | Kumar |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 8 |
Converted | 7/28 | 8/17 |
% Converted | 25% | 47% |
Conceded | 20 | 12 |
Saved | 12 | 8 |
% Saved | 60% | 67% |
Times Broken | 8 | 4 |
The Argentine broke his opponents 7 times with a 25% conversion rate. The Argentine lost his serve 8 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Omni broke his opponents 8 times with a 47% conversion rate. Kumar conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Manuel Cerundolo | ||||
R1 Safiullin |
R2 Hanfmann |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-65 3-6 6-3 | 7-63 5-7 7-64 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 38 | 69 | |
pts | 109-108 | 124-125 | 233-233 | |
Total points | 217 | 249 | 466 | |
Winners | 46 | 44 | 90 | |
%Winners | 42% | 35% | 39% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 9 | 4 | 13 | |
Double Faults | 8 | 11 | 19 | |
1st in | 62/107 | 61/124 | 123/231 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 49% | 53% | |
1st pts | 46/62 | 44/61 | 90/123 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 72% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 22/45 | 29/63 | 51/108 | |
% 2nd pts | 49% | 46% | 47% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
Converted | 2/14 | 5/14 | 7/28 | |
Converted % | 14% | 36% | 25% | |
Conceded | 7 | 13 | 20 | |
Saved | 5/7 | 7/13 | 12 | |
Saved % | 71% | 54% | 63% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 6 | 8 |
Kumar | ||||||
Q1 Haase |
Q3 Marchenko |
R1 Rinderknech |
R2 Van De Zandschulp |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 1-6 7-5 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-3 7-63 | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 26 | 20 | 22 | 21 | 89 | |
pts | 81-79 | – | 63-57 | 68-63 | 212-199 | |
Total points | 160 | 0 | 120 | 131 | 411 | |
Winners | 33 | 25 | 32 | 90 | ||
%Winners | 41% | 0% | 40% | 47% | 42% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 0 | 4 | 8 | ||
1st in | 45/84 | / | 29/66 | 45/73 | 119/223 | |
% 1st in | 54% | 0% | 44% | 62% | 53% | |
1st pts | 33/45 | / | 25/29 | 32/45 | 90/119 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 0% | 86% | 71% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 17/39 | / | 24/37 | 15/28 | 56/104 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 0% | 65% | 54% | 54% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | ||
Converted | 4/7 | / | 1/2 | 3/8 | 8/17 | |
Converted % | 57% | 0% | 50% | 38% | 47% | |
Conceded | 8 | 1 | 3 | 12 | ||
Saved | 5/8 | 0/ | 1/1 | 2/3 | 8 | |
Saved % | 63% | – | 100% | 67% | 115% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Salem Open
- Alex MichelsenMichelsen – Sebastian OfnerOfner (7-64 7-5) – See score progression
- Laslo DjereDjere – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (2-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Omni KumarKumar – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Benjamin BonziBonzi (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Borna CoricCoric – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-2 7-62) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Marcos GironGiron (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Arthur FilsFils (6-75 7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-3 6-75 6-3) – See score progression
- Max PurcellPurcell – Andrey KuznetsovKuznetsov (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (7-63 5-7 7-64) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Jack DraperDraper (7-68 ret.) – See score progression
- Sebastian BaezBaez – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (3-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Sebastian KordaKorda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna CoricCoric – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Sebastian BaezBaez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Omni KumarKumar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Richard GasquetGasquet (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (0-0) – H2H and prediction