Rudolf Molleker and Maxime Chazal will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Prague 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 5. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Rudolf Molleker who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Rudolf Molleker is the pick to win this match.
Rudolf Molleker -> 1.444
Maxime Chazal -> 2.625
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Rudolf Molleker vs. Maxime Chazal
There is no head to head record between Rudolf Molleker and Maxime Chazal since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Rudolf Molleker
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 28-34 | 4-8 | 15-18 | 7-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 53-35 | 2-3 | 42-25 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 3-1 |
2022 | 47-28 | 2-1 | 45-24 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 8-23 | 0-1 | 6-16 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-7 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 263, Molleker got to the 2nd round after defeating Lukas Rosol 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Rudolf had a good straight sets win against Rosol (6-3 6-4). During the match, Molleker scored 69 points vs Rosol’s 48. Molleker was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Molleker scored 13 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Rudolf Molleker was quite efficient on serve to win 81% (26/32) of his 1st serve and 60% (12/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The German broke Rosol 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Molleker has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 54% of his matches (190-162). 32-18 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Molleker has a compiled145-99 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
Molleker’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Oberhaching,M25 Palmanova and M25 Bodrum.
Rudolf has an aggregate 40-25 win-loss record in 2023, 32-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 3 Challenger
Maxime Chazal
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 40-25 | 0-3 | 38-16 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 44-29 | 13-10 | 31-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 38-27 | 3-2 | 35-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 359, Maxime got to the 2nd round after defeating Marek Gengel 6-2 6-2.
In the 1st round, Chazal had a good straight sets win against Gengel (6-2 6-2). During the match Chazal scored 59 points vs Gengel’s 39. Maxime was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Chazal managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Maxime Chazal lost the serve once and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Chazal put 53% of his first serves in, winning 81% (22/27) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (11/24) on the 2nd serve. Chazal broke Gengel 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Maxime’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Angers,M25 Sabadell and M25 Grasse.
The French player has an overall 43-25 win-loss record in 2023, 30-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Molleker | Chazal |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 16 |
Pts | 69-48 | 59-39 |
Total Points | 117 | 98 |
Winners | 26 | 22 |
%Winners | 38% | 37% |
Both Molleker and Chazal played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Molleker and Chazal have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Molleker played 3 games more than Chazal. Rudolf scored 26 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Maxime struck 22 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Molleker | Chazal |
---|---|---|
Aces | 13 | 4 |
Avg per match | 13 | 4 |
1st in | 32/52 | 27/51 |
%1st in | 62% | 53% |
1st pts | 26/32 | 22/27 |
%1st pts | 81% | 81% |
2nd pts | 12/20 | 11/24 |
%2nd pts | 60% | 46% |
Molleker bagged 13 aces . Chazal managed to score 4 aces . Molleker won 81% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Chazal won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Molleker | Chazal |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 5 |
Converted | 3/7 | 5/9 |
% Converted | 43% | 56% |
Conceded | 2 | 7 |
Saved | 1 | 6 |
% Saved | 50% | 86% |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The German broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The German lost his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Chazal conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
Molleker | |||
R1 Rosol |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 69-48 | 69-48 | |
Total points | 117 | 117 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 13 | 13 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 32/52 | 32/52 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
1st pts | 26/32 | 26/32 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
2nd pts | 12/20 | 12/20 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Chazal | |||
R1 Gengel |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 59-39 | 59-39 | |
Total points | 98 | 98 | |
Winners | 22 | 22 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 27/51 | 27/51 | |
% 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
1st pts | 22/27 | 22/27 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
2nd pts | 11/24 | 11/24 | |
% 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Prague 3 Challenger
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Jakub NicodNicod – Hynek BartonBarton (1-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Pawel CiasCias (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Kirill KivattsevKivattsev (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Joao SousaSousa – Valentin RoyerRoyer (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Mathys ErhardErhard – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (7-60 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Gabriel DebruDebru – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Henri SquireSquire (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Mathias BourgueBourgue (4-6 7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-4 1-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Lukas RosolRosol (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Facundo MenaMena – Carlos Lopez MontagudLopez Montagud (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Maxime ChazalChazal – Marek GengelGengel (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Gabriel DebruDebru – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jakub NicodNicod – Hynek BartonBarton (1-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Mathias BourgueBourgue (4-6 7-6(3) 6-2) – See score progression
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Joao SousaSousa – Valentin RoyerRoyer (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Henri SquireSquire (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Kirill KivattsevKivattsev (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Pawel CiasCias (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mathys ErhardErhard – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (7-6(0) 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Maxime ChazalChazal – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Facundo MenaMena (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Joao SousaSousa (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Mathys ErhardErhard (1-0) – H2H and prediction