![Prediction And Head To Head Lorenzo Giustino Vs. Federico Agustin Gomez 1qi4h6igr7 Prediction and head to head Lorenzo Giustino vs. Federico Agustin Gomez](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Lorenzo-Giustino-vs.-Federico-Agustin-Gomez-1qi4H6igr7.jpg)
Lorenzo Giustino and Federico Agustin Gomez will face off in the 2nd round of the Prague 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 7. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lorenzo Giustino who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lorenzo Giustino is the pick to win this match.
Lorenzo Giustino -> 1.71
Federico Agustin Gomez -> 2.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Lorenzo Giustino vs. Federico Agustin Gomez
There is no head to head record between Lorenzo Giustino and Federico Agustin Gomez since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Lorenzo Giustino
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 27-19 | 2-4 | 23-10 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 27-38 | 14-16 | 10-19 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 22-37 | 3-5 | 19-26 | 0-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 21-39 | 3-8 | 14-26 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 16-19 | 6-7 | 7-9 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 300, Lorenzo reached the 2nd round after beating Filip Cristian Jianu 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Lorenzo had a good straight sets win against Cristian Jianu (6-4 6-3). During the match, Giustino scored 77 points vs Cristian Jianu’s 64. Lorenzo was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Giustino scored just 1 ace and he committed only 8 double faults. Lorenzo Giustino lost the serve 5 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Giustino put 60% of his first serves in, winning 56% (25/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (13/30) on the 2nd serve. Giustino broke Cristian Jianu 7 times after converting 44% of his break points (7/16).
Giustino has good match record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (338-316). 10-16 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Giustino has a composed 259-216 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Giustino’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Francavilla Challenger.
The Italian has an overall 22-27 win-loss record in 2023, 10-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 3 Challenger
Federico Agustin Gomez
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 38-15 | 0-0 | 38-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 51-30 | 8-10 | 40-19 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 30-21 | 13-9 | 13-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
2021 | 28-10 | 23-5 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 425, Agustin reached the 2nd round after defeating Oleg Prihodko 6-4 4-6 6-4, Miguel Damas 6-2 6-2 and Henri Squire 4-6 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round against Squire, The Argentine recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-3). During the match Agustin scored 93 points vs Squire’s 86. The Argentine was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Agustin managed to score 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Federico Agustin Gomez was pretty effective on serve to win 75% (38/51) of his 1st serve and 59% (22/37) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Federico broke Squire 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Federico’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Naples.
Federico has an overall 37-19 win-loss record in 2023, 36-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Giustino | Agustin |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
Tot Games | 19 | 75 |
Pts | 77-64 | 262-229 |
Total Points | 141 | 491 |
Winners | 25 | 102 |
%Winners | 32% | 39% |
Giustino played 1 match while Agustin competed in 3 matches. Agustin started his run from the qualifications while Giustino had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Federico Agustin Gomez dropped 2 sets while Lorenzo Giustino hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Giustino has played 6 set(s) less than Agustin (2 vs 8). Therefore, Giustino played 56 games less than Agustin. Lorenzo scored 25 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Federico made 102 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Giustino | Agustin |
---|---|---|
Aces | 1 | 12 |
Avg per match | 1 | 4 |
1st in | 45/75 | 143/237 |
%1st in | 60% | 60% |
1st pts | 25/45 | 102/143 |
%1st pts | 56% | 71% |
2nd pts | 13/30 | 52/94 |
%2nd pts | 43% | 55% |
Giustino struck 1 ace . Agustin also fired 12 aces (4 per match). Giustino won 56% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Agustin won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Giustino | Agustin |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 12 |
Converted | 7/16 | 12/35 |
% Converted | 44% | 34% |
Conceded | 12 | 22 |
Saved | 7 | 16 |
% Saved | 58% | 73% |
Times Broken | 5 | 6 |
Giustino broke his opponent 7 times with a 44% conversion rate. Lorenzo dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded. The Argentine broke his opponents 12 times with a 34% conversion rate. Federico conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
Giustino | |||
R1 Cristian |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 77-64 | 77-64 | |
Total points | 141 | 141 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | |
%Winners | 32% | 32% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
1st in | 45/75 | 45/75 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
1st pts | 25/45 | 25/45 | |
% 1st pts | 56% | 56% | |
2nd pts | 13/30 | 13/30 | |
% 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 7 | 7 | |
Converted | 7/16 | 7/16 | |
Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
Saved | 7/12 | 7 | |
Saved % | 58% | 58% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
Agustin | |||||
Q1 Prihodko |
Q3 Damas |
R1 Squire |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | 6-2 6-2 | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 16 | 29 | 75 | |
pts | 104-98 | 65-45 | 93-86 | 262-229 | |
Total points | 202 | 110 | 179 | 491 | |
Winners | 33 | 31 | 38 | 102 | |
%Winners | 32% | 48% | 41% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 4 | 1 | 7 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | |
1st in | 51/92 | 41/57 | 51/88 | 143/237 | |
% 1st in | 55% | 72% | 58% | 60% | |
1st pts | 33/51 | 31/41 | 38/51 | 102/143 | |
% 1st pts | 65% | 76% | 75% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 23/41 | 7/16 | 22/37 | 52/94 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 44% | 59% | 55% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 4 | 3 | 12 | |
Converted | 5/19 | 4/9 | 3/7 | 12/35 | |
Converted % | 26% | 44% | 43% | 34% | |
Conceded | 10 | 4 | 8 | 22 | |
Saved | 6/10 | 4/4 | 6/8 | 16 | |
Saved % | 60% | 100% | 75% | 235% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Prague 3 Challenger
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Kirill KivattsevKivattsev (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Joao SousaSousa – Valentin RoyerRoyer (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Mathys ErhardErhard – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (7-60 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Gabriel DebruDebru – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Henri SquireSquire (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Mathias BourgueBourgue (4-6 7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Jakub NicodNicod – Hynek BartonBarton (1-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Pawel CiasCias (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Facundo MenaMena – Carlos Lopez MontagudLopez Montagud (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Maxime ChazalChazal – Marek GengelGengel (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-4 1-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Lukas RosolRosol (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Gabriel DebruDebru – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jakub NicodNicod – Hynek BartonBarton (1-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Mathias BourgueBourgue (4-6 7-6(3) 6-2) – See score progression
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Joao SousaSousa – Valentin RoyerRoyer (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Henri SquireSquire (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Kirill KivattsevKivattsev (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Pawel CiasCias (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mathys ErhardErhard – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (7-6(0) 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Maxime ChazalChazal – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Facundo MenaMena (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Joao SousaSousa (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Mathys ErhardErhard (1-0) – H2H and prediction