Pawel Cias and Alexander Donski will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Prague 3 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 7. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Pawel Cias who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Pawel Cias is the pick to win this match.
Pawel Cias -> 1.47
Alexander Donski -> 2.54
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Pawel Cias vs. Alexander Donski
This will be the 2nd time that Pawel Cias and Alexander Donski fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Cias (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played, Cias won 7-5 6-4 in the 1st round in M15 Celje back in June 2023.
Pawel Cias
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|
Ranked no. 688, Pawel reached the qualifications after beating Daniel Merida Aguilar 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Cias had a good straight sets win against Merida Aguilar (6-4 6-2). During the match, Cias scored 59 points vs Merida Aguilar’s 45. Pawel was very aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cias recorded 3 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults. Pawel Cias lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Cias put 55% of his first serves in, winning 62% (18/29) of the points behind his 1st serve and 63% (15/24) on the 2nd serve. Cias broke Merida Aguilar 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Cias has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (257-153). 18-7 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Cias has an overall 194-114 record in the last years on clay.
The Pole’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Litija and M15 Celje.
Pawel has an aggregate 24-12 win-loss record in 2023, 18-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 3 Challenger
Alexander Donski
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-12 | 22-11 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 20-22 | 11-9 | 8-9 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-25 | 33-16 | 2-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-24 | 13-14 | 5-6 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-9 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 802, Alexander got to the qualifications after defeating Luca Potenza 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Canadian had a good straight sets win against Potenza (6-2 6-3). During the match Donski scored 66 points vs Potenza’s 40. The Canadian was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Donski bagged 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Alexander Donski was quite efficient on serve to win 92% (24/26) of his 1st serve and 60% (15/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Donski broke Potenza 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Alexander has a compiled 12-14 win-loss record in 2023, 8-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cias | Donski |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 |
| Pts | 59-45 | 66-40 |
| Total Points | 104 | 106 |
| Winners | 18 | 24 |
| %Winners | 31% | 36% |
Both Cias and Donski played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Cias and Donski have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Cias played 1 game more than Donski. The Pole scored 18 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, Alexander struck 24 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cias | Donski |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 7 |
| 1st in | 29/53 | 26/51 |
| %1st in | 55% | 51% |
| 1st pts | 18/29 | 24/26 |
| %1st pts | 62% | 92% |
| 2nd pts | 15/24 | 15/25 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 60% |
Cias managed to score 3 aces . Donski scored 7 aces . Cias won 62% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Donski won 92% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cias | Donski |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 63% | 43% |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 33% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Cias broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Cias dropped his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Alexander broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Canadian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Cias | |||
| Q1 Merida |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 59-45 | 59-45 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 29/53 | 29/53 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 18/29 | 18/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/24 | 15/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Donski | |||
| Q1 Potenza |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 66-40 | 66-40 | |
| Total points | 106 | 106 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 26/51 | 26/51 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 24/26 | 24/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 92% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 15/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lukas RosolRosol – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Mathias BourgueBourgue (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Carlos Lopez MontagudLopez Montagud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pawel CiasCias – Alexander DonskiDonski (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Miguel DamasDamas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Maxime ChazalChazal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathys ErhardErhard – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Joao SousaSousa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (1-1) – H2H and prediction
