Michael Vrbensky and Jaime Faria will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Prague 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Michael Vrbensky who should win in 3 sets.
Michael Vrbensky -> 1.5
Jaime Faria -> 2.46
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Michael Vrbensky vs. Jaime Faria
There is no head to head record between Michael Vrbensky and Jaime Faria since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Michael Vrbensky
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27-31 | 4-4 | 19-20 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 38-27 | 4-4 | 32-18 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 58-28 | 11-6 | 44-21 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 54-27 | 7-3 | 37-16 | 10-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 17-24 | 2-1 | 14-21 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 373, the Czech reached the qualifications after defeating Szymon Kielan 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Kielan (6-2 6-4). During the match, Vrbensky scored 72 points vs Kielan’s 61. The Czech was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Vrbensky made 3 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Michael Vrbensky lost the serve twice and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Vrbensky put 55% of his first serves in, winning 64% (27/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (16/34) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Kielan 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Vrbensky has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 60% of his matches (224-148). 24-16 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Vrbensky has an aggregate153-98 record in the last 7 years on clay.
Michael’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio,M25 Faro and M25 Most.
The Czech has a composed 35-22 win-loss record in 2023, 24-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 3 Challenger
Jaime Faria
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25-28 | 9-6 | 9-15 | 2-5 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 53-25 | 24-5 | 27-14 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 49-31 | 33-17 | 16-12 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-24 | 20-12 | 23-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-10 | 6-6 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 512, Jaime reached the qualifications after defeating Daniel Siniakov 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, Jaime had a good straight sets win against Siniakov (6-1 6-4). During the match Faria scored 67 points vs Siniakov’s 51. The Portuguese was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Faria scored 8 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Jaime Faria lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Faria put 61% of his first serves in, winning 74% (32/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (12/27) on the 2nd serve. Jaime broke Siniakov 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Faria’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula and M25 Castelo Branco.
Jaime has a composed 27-20 win-loss record in 2023, 12-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 3 Challenger
The Portuguese has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Vrbensky | Faria |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 |
| Pts | 72-61 | 67-51 |
| Total Points | 133 | 118 |
| Winners | 27 | 32 |
| %Winners | 38% | 48% |
Both Vrbensky and Faria played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Vrbensky and Faria have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Vrbensky played 1 game more than Faria. Michael scored 27 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Faria bagged 32 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Vrbensky | Faria |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 8 |
| 1st in | 42/76 | 43/70 |
| %1st in | 55% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 27/42 | 32/43 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 16/34 | 12/27 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 44% |
Vrbensky struck 3 aces . Faria made 8 aces . Vrbensky won 64% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Faria won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Vrbensky | Faria |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 71% | 67% |
| Conceded | 12 | 3 |
| Saved | 10 | 2 |
| % Saved | 83% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Vrbensky broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Michael lost his serve twice and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. The Portuguese broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Portuguese conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Vrbensky | |||
| Q1 Kielan | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 72-61 | 72-61 | |
| Total points | 133 | 133 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 42/76 | 42/76 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 27/42 | 27/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/34 | 16/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 10/12 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Faria | |||
| Q1 Siniakov | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 67-51 | 67-51 | |
| Total points | 118 | 118 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 43/70 | 43/70 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 32/43 | 32/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/27 | 12/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lukas RosolRosol – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Mathias BourgueBourgue (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Carlos Lopez MontagudLopez Montagud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pawel CiasCias – Alexander DonskiDonski (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Miguel DamasDamas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Maxime ChazalChazal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathys ErhardErhard – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Joao SousaSousa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (1-1) – H2H and prediction