Martina Trevisan and Xiyu Wang will face off in the qualifications of the Tennis in the Land for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 12:00 pm on STADIUM COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Martina Trevisan who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Martina Trevisan is the pick to win this match.
Martina Trevisan -> 1.615
Xiyu Wang -> 2.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Martina Trevisan vs. Xiyu Wang
There is no head to head record between Martina Trevisan and Xiyu Wang since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Martina Trevisan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-32 | 10-19 | 12-11 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-27 | 17-17 | 6-7 | 4-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-22 | 8-10 | 15-7 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-27 | 8-12 | 14-10 | 4-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-9 | 6-5 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 63, Martina got to the qualifications after beating Alana Smith 6-1 7-61.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Smith (6-1 7-61). During the match, Trevisan scored 80 points vs Smith’s 61. Trevisan was pretty aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Trevisan was unable to score even 1 ace during the match and she committed only 5 double faults. Martina Trevisan lost the serve 3 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Trevisan put 57% of her first serves in, winning 68% (23/34) of the points behind her 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Smith 6 times after converting 46% of her break points (6/13).
Trevisan has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 61% of her matches (266-171). 10-10 on hard in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this competition, Trevisan has an overall 49-50 record in the last years on hard.
Martina’s best result of the year was reaching the final in Australia.
Trevisan has an overall 17-19 win-loss record in 2023, 10-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cleveland
Xiyu Wang
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-30 | 18-19 | 9-8 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 17-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-25 | 15-10 | 23-11 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-19 | 8-7 | 9-7 | 0-1 | 4-3 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 11-7 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 93, the Chinese got to the qualifications after beating Valeriya Strakhova 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, Wang had a good straight sets win against Strakhova (6-4 6-1). During the match Wang scored 67 points vs Strakhova’s 48. The Chinese was pretty aggressive to blast 20 winners.
About the serving games, Wang blasted 3 aces and she was not very steady on her 2nd serve to score 12 double faults. Xiyu Wang lost the serve 4 times and she saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Wang put 42% of her first serves in, winning 71% (20/28) of the points behind her 1st serve and 41% (16/39) on the 2nd serve. Wang broke Strakhova 7 times after converting 88% of her break points (7/8).
Xiyu has an aggregate 16-18 win-loss record in 2023, 6-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cleveland
Xiyu has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Trevisan | Wang |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 17 |
| Pts | 80-61 | 67-48 |
| Total Points | 141 | 115 |
| Winners | 23 | 20 |
| %Winners | 29% | 30% |
Both Trevisan and Wang played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Trevisan and Wang have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Trevisan played 3 games more than Wang. The Italian scored 23 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, Wang scored 20 winners (30%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Trevisan | Wang |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 3 |
| 1st in | 34/60 | 28/67 |
| %1st in | 57% | 42% |
| 1st pts | 23/34 | 20/28 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 16/39 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 41% |
Trevisan didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Wang struck 3 aces . Trevisan won 68% points on her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Wang won 71% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Trevisan | Wang |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 7 |
| Converted | 6/13 | 7/8 |
| % Converted | 46% | 88% |
| Conceded | 5 | 13 |
| Saved | 2 | 9 |
| % Saved | 40% | 69% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Martina broke her opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. The Italian conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 40% of the break points that she conceded. The Chinese broke her opponent 7 times with a 88% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 69% of the break points that she conceded.
| Trevisan | |||
| Q1 Smith |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-61 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 80-61 | 80-61 | |
| Total points | 141 | 141 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 34/60 | 34/60 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 23/34 | 23/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 15/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Wang | |||
| Q1 Strakhova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 67-48 | 67-48 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 12 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 28/67 | 28/67 | |
| % 1st in | 42% | 42% | |
| 1st pts | 20/28 | 20/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/39 | 16/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/8 | 7/8 | |
| Converted % | 88% | 88% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 9/13 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 69% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLLLWW
LWLWLWWLWL Tennis Scores in Cleveland
- Joao DominguesDomingues – Ivan NedelkoNedelko (6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Pedro CachinCachin (4-6 6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Guilherme ClezarClezar – Pedro SakamotoSakamoto (6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (6-0 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Xin Yu WangYu Wang – Jamie LoebLoeb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clara BurelBurel – Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Martina TrevisanTrevisan – Xiyu WangWang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Clara TausonTauson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Fernanda Contreras GomezContreras Gomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline GarciaGarcia – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Julia GrabherGrabher (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lin ZhuZhu – Anna BlinkovaBlinkova (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova – Patricia Maria TigMaria Tig (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emma NavarroNavarro – Jasmine PaoliniPaolini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Irina-Camelia BeguBegu – Mayar SherifSherif (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Lauren DavisDavis (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Ana BogdanBogdan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (0-1) – H2H and prediction
