Mitchell Krueger and Inaki Montes-De La Torre will square off in the qualifications of the Winston-Salem for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 1:00 pm on STADIUM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mitchell Krueger who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mitchell Krueger is the pick to win this match.
Mitchell Krueger -> 1.7
Inaki Montes-De La Torre -> 2.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mitchell Krueger vs. Inaki Montes-De La Torre
There is no head to head record between Mitchell Krueger and Inaki Montes-De La Torre since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Mitchell Krueger
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-17 | 18-8 | 9-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 15-19 | 4-4 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-28 | 18-15 | 6-5 | 1-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-24 | 19-12 | 5-5 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-13 | 14-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 278, Krueger reached the qualifications after defeating Alexey Zakharov 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Krueger had a good straight sets win against Zakharov (6-4 6-2). During the match, Krueger scored 63 points vs Zakharov’s 43. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Krueger wasn’t able to score even 1 ace during the match and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Mitchell Krueger was very efficient on serve to win 89% (24/27) of his 1st serve and 55% (12/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Zakharov 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Krueger has positive match record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (308-283). 11-14 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Krueger has a compiled 204-176 record in the last years on hard.
The American’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Dallas.
Krueger has an aggregate 22-20 win-loss record in 2023, 11-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Winston-Salem
Mitchell has never competed in this tournament before.
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
14 - 5win/loss
507
493
LWWLWWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 22-9 | 5-4 | 9-2 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-11 | 8-7 | 7-1 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-7 | 9-4 | 10-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 522, Inaki reached the qualifications after beating Stefan Kozlov 3-6 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications against Kozlov, Inaki recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-1 6-3). During the match Montes-De La Torre scored 92 points vs Kozlov’s 80. The Spaniard was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
About the serving games, Montes-De La Torre was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was not very steady on his 2nd serve to score 11 double faults. Inaki Montes-De La Torre lost the serve 4 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Montes-De La Torre put 59% of his first serves in, winning 63% (32/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (15/36) on the 2nd serve. Montes-De La Torre broke Kozlov 7 times after converting 54% of his break points (7/13).
Inaki’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Bergamo and M25 Getxo.
Inaki has an aggregate 14-4 win-loss record in 2023, 5-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Winston-Salem
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Krueger | Montes-De La Torre |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 25 |
| Pts | 63-43 | 92-80 |
| Total Points | 106 | 172 |
| Winners | 24 | 32 |
| %Winners | 38% | 35% |
Both Krueger and Montes-De La Torre played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Inaki Montes-De La Torre dropped 1 set while Mitchell Krueger hasn’t dropped a set so far. Krueger has played 1 set(s) less than Montes-De La Torre (2 vs 3). Therefore, Krueger played 7 games less than Montes-De La Torre. Krueger scored 24 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Inaki managed to score 32 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Krueger | Montes-De La Torre |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 27/49 | 51/87 |
| %1st in | 55% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 24/27 | 32/51 |
| %1st pts | 89% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 12/22 | 15/36 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 42% |
Krueger didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Montes-De La Torre also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Krueger won 89% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Montes-De La Torre won 63% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Krueger | Montes-De La Torre |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 7 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 7/13 |
| % Converted | 50% | 54% |
| Conceded | 2 | 15 |
| Saved | 1 | 11 |
| % Saved | 50% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Mitchell broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Mitchell conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Inaki broke his opponent 7 times with a 54% conversion rate. Inaki conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Krueger | |||
| Q1 Zakharov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 63-43 | 63-43 | |
| Total points | 106 | 106 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 27/49 | 27/49 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 24/27 | 24/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/22 | 12/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Montes-De La Torre | |||
| Q1 Kozlov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 92-80 | 92-80 | |
| Total points | 172 | 172 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 11 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 51/87 | 51/87 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 32/51 | 32/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/36 | 15/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/13 | 7/13 | |
| Converted % | 54% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 15 | |
| Saved | 11/15 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 73% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Omni KumarKumar (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Andrey KuznetsovKuznetsov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Benjamin BonziBonzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Dominic ThiemThiem (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Darian KingKing (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Jack DraperDraper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Quentin HalysHalys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (1-0) – H2H and prediction
