Jesper De Jong and Benjamin Hassan will play each other in the final of the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 3:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jesper De Jong who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Jesper De Jong is the pick to win this match.
Jesper De Jong -> 1.45
Benjamin Hassan -> 2.65

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Jesper De Jong vs. Benjamin Hassan

This will be the 2nd time that Jesper De Jong and Benjamin Hassan face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Hassan (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.

The last time that they competed against each other, Hassan won 6-7(4) 6-4 6-3 in the qualifications in the Potchefstroom 1 Challenger back in 2021.

Jesper De Jong

Jesper De Jong

0 - 0win/loss

Rank
120
High
119
LWWWWWWLWL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 28-16 7-3 20-10 0-2 1-1 0-0
2023 52-23 19-4 30-14 0-2 3-3 0-0
2022 24-28 12-7 10-13 2-5 0-3 0-0
2021 32-29 2-6 27-18 3-5 0-0 0-0
2020 31-12 7-3 14-5 10-4 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 183, the Dutch reached the final after beating Santiago Rodriguez Taverna 6-3 4-3 ret., Charles Broom 6-4 6-4, Maks Kasnikowski 6-0 6-2 and Elias Ymer 7-67 6-1.

In the semifinal, De Jong had a good straight sets win against Ymer (7-67 6-1). During the match, De Jong scored 73 points vs Ymer’s 61. The Dutch was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.

Regarding the service games, De Jong blasted 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jesper De Jong lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, De Jong put 58% of his first serves in, winning 81% (34/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (13/30) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Ymer 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).

Overall Performance in this tournament

The Dutch hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to conquer 57% of the points he played.

De Jong has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 63% of his matches (200-118). 14-1 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, De Jong has a compiled69-32 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.

The Dutch’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Tigre 2 Challenger,M25 Quinta Do Lago and the Rome Challenger.

De Jong has a composed 47-19 win-loss record in 2023, 14-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger

De Jong has never competed in this tournament before.

Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
De Jong's Record

Benjamin Hassan

Benjamin Hassan

0 - 0win/loss

Rank
154
High
143
LLWLLWLLWW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 15-20 3-7 10-9 1-2 1-2 0-0
2023 57-33 11-6 35-20 10-6 1-1 0-0
2022 36-29 7-3 21-16 8-9 0-0 0-1
2021 21-23 2-2 17-16 2-4 0-0 0-1
2020 4-2 0-0 4-1 0-1 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 244 (career-high), Hassan reached the final after defeating Martyn Pawelski 6-2 6-0, Jiri Vesely 4-6 7-65 7-65, Marius Copil 7-5 6-1 and Denis Yevseyev 6-4 6-4.

In the semifinal, The Lebanese had a good straight sets win against Yevseyev (6-4 6-4). During the match Hassan scored 69 points vs Yevseyev’s 60. Benjamin was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.

Talking about serving, Hassan struck 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Benjamin Hassan was extremely efficient on serve to win 73% (29/40) of his 1st serve and 53% (16/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Hassan broke Yevseyev 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Benjamin has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.

The Lebanese’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Al Zahra,the Biel Challenger,the Florianopolis Challenger,the Blois Challenger,the Braunschweig Challenger and the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger.

Hassan has a compiled 37-23 win-loss record in 2023, 9-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
Hassan's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

J.De Jong
B.Hassan
6h:09
6h:09
Time on court​
6h:48
6h:48
1h:46
1h:46
Last match​
1h:30
1h:30
4
4
Match played
4
4
70
70
Games Played​
89
89
9
9
Set played​​
9
9
269
269
Total points​
299
299
67.3
67.3
Avg point​
74.8
74.8
107
107
Winners
107
107
26.8
26.8
Avg Winners​
26.8
26.8
40%
40%
Ratio winners
36%
36%
-- Serve --
17
17
Aces
23
23
4.3
4.3
Avg Aces
5.8
5.8
7
7
Double Faults
6
6
1.8
1.8
Avg Double Faults
1.5
1.5
107/133
107/133
1st won total​
107/136
107/136
!
80%
80%
1st won %
!
79%
79%
50/91
50/91
2nd won total​
79/125
79/125
55%
55%
2nd won %
!
63%
63%
-- Break Points --
14/37
14/37
BP won
14/24
14/24
3.5/9.3
3.5/9.3
Avg BP won
3.5/6
3.5/6
38%
38%
Won
!
58%
58%
12
12
Conceded
16
16
3
3
Avg Conceded
4
4
3
3
Broken
5
5
!
0.8
0.8
Avg Broken
1.3
1.3
9
9
Saved
11
11

Matches, sets, games and points

Points De Jong Hassan
Match played 4 4
Tot Set 9 9
Tot Games 70 89
Pts 269-204 299-237
Total Points 473 536
Winners 107 107
%Winners 40% 36%

Both De Jong and Hassan played 4 matches. At the moment, Benjamin Hassan conceded 1 set while Jesper De Jong hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Talking about their workload, De Jong and Hassan have played the same amount of sets 9. However, De Jong played 19 games less than Hassan. The Dutch scored 107 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Benjamin blasted 107 winners (36%).

Serve Performance

Serve De Jong Hassan
Aces 17 23
Avg per match 4.3 5.8
1st in 133/224 136/261
%1st in 59% 52%
1st pts 107/133 107/136
%1st pts 80% 79%
2nd pts 50/91 79/125
%2nd pts 55% 63%

De Jong bagged 17 aces (4.3 per match). Hassan scored 23 aces (5.8 per match). De Jong won 80% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Hassan won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks De Jong Hassan
Won 14 14
Converted 14/37 14/24
% Converted 38% 58%
Conceded 12 16
Saved 9 11
% Saved 75% 69%
Times Broken 3 5

De Jong broke his opponents 14 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Dutch surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. The Lebanese broke his opponents 14 times with a 58% conversion rate. Benjamin conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded.

De Jong
R1
Rodriguez Taverna
R2
Broom
1/4
Kasnikowski
1/2
Ymer
Total
Score 6-3 4-3 ret. 6-4 6-4 6-0 6-2 7-67 6-1
Tot Set 2 2 2 2 8
Tot Games 16 20 14 20 70
pts 65-48 73-65 58-30 73-61 269-204
Total points 113 138 88 134 473
Winners 23 29 21 34 107
%Winners 35% 40% 36% 47% 40%
SERVE
Aces 2 7 6 2 17
Double Faults 2 2 1 2 7
1st in 24/45 44/73 23/34 42/72 133/224
% 1st in 53% 60% 68% 58% 59%
1st pts 23/24 29/44 21/23 34/42 107/133
% 1st pts 96% 66% 91% 81% 80%
2nd pts 14/21 16/29 7/11 13/30 50/91
% 2nd pts 67% 55% 64% 43% 55%
Breaks
Won 2 4 5 3 14
Converted 2/12 4/10 5/9 3/6 14/37
Converted % 17% 40% 56% 50% 38%
Conceded 0 10 0 2 12
Saved 0/0 8/10 0/0 1/2 9
Saved % 80% 50% 33%
Times Broken 0 2 0 1 3
Hassan
R1
Pawelski
R2
Vesely
1/4
Copil
1/2
Yevseyev
Total
Score 6-2 6-0 4-6 7-65 7-65 7-5 6-1 6-4 6-4
Tot Set 2 3 2 2 9
Tot Games 14 36 19 20 89
pts 59-29 107-105 64-43 69-60 299-237
Total points 88 212 107 129 536
Winners 18 36 24 29 107
%Winners 31% 34% 38% 42% 36%
SERVE
Aces 4 9 5 5 23
Double Faults 1 3 0 2 6
1st in 21/34 46/104 29/53 40/70 136/261
% 1st in 62% 44% 55% 57% 52%
1st pts 18/21 36/46 24/29 29/40 107/136
% 1st pts 86% 78% 83% 73% 79%
2nd pts 10/13 35/58 18/24 16/30 79/125
% 2nd pts 77% 60% 75% 53% 63%
Breaks
Won 5 3 3 3 14
Converted 5/12 3/4 3/4 3/4 14/24
Converted % 42% 75% 75% 75% 58%
Conceded 0 6 2 8 16
Saved 0/0 2/6 2/2 7/8 11
Saved % 33% 100% 88% 55%
Times Broken 0 4 0 1 5

Upcoming matches in the draw