Jesper De Jong and Benjamin Hassan will play each other in the final of the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 3:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jesper De Jong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jesper De Jong is the pick to win this match.
Jesper De Jong -> 1.45
Benjamin Hassan -> 2.65
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jesper De Jong vs. Benjamin Hassan
This will be the 2nd time that Jesper De Jong and Benjamin Hassan face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Hassan (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Hassan won 6-7(4) 6-4 6-3 in the qualifications in the Potchefstroom 1 Challenger back in 2021.
Jesper De Jong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 48-25 | 12-5 | 33-15 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-23 | 19-4 | 30-14 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-28 | 12-7 | 10-13 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-29 | 2-6 | 27-18 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 183, the Dutch reached the final after beating Santiago Rodriguez Taverna 6-3 4-3 ret., Charles Broom 6-4 6-4, Maks Kasnikowski 6-0 6-2 and Elias Ymer 7-67 6-1.
In the semifinal, De Jong had a good straight sets win against Ymer (7-67 6-1). During the match, De Jong scored 73 points vs Ymer’s 61. The Dutch was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, De Jong blasted 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jesper De Jong lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, De Jong put 58% of his first serves in, winning 81% (34/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (13/30) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Ymer 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Dutch hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to conquer 57% of the points he played.
De Jong has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 63% of his matches (200-118). 14-1 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, De Jong has a compiled69-32 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
The Dutch’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Tigre 2 Challenger,M25 Quinta Do Lago and the Rome Challenger.
De Jong has a composed 47-19 win-loss record in 2023, 14-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
De Jong has never competed in this tournament before.
Benjamin Hassan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 38-39 | 8-12 | 20-16 | 9-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 57-33 | 11-6 | 35-20 | 10-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 7-3 | 21-16 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 21-23 | 2-2 | 17-16 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 244 (career-high), Hassan reached the final after defeating Martyn Pawelski 6-2 6-0, Jiri Vesely 4-6 7-65 7-65, Marius Copil 7-5 6-1 and Denis Yevseyev 6-4 6-4.
In the semifinal, The Lebanese had a good straight sets win against Yevseyev (6-4 6-4). During the match Hassan scored 69 points vs Yevseyev’s 60. Benjamin was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Hassan struck 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Benjamin Hassan was extremely efficient on serve to win 73% (29/40) of his 1st serve and 53% (16/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Hassan broke Yevseyev 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Benjamin has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
The Lebanese’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Al Zahra,the Biel Challenger,the Florianopolis Challenger,the Blois Challenger,the Braunschweig Challenger and the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger.
Hassan has a compiled 37-23 win-loss record in 2023, 9-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | De Jong | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 70 | 89 |
| Pts | 269-204 | 299-237 |
| Total Points | 473 | 536 |
| Winners | 107 | 107 |
| %Winners | 40% | 36% |
Both De Jong and Hassan played 4 matches. At the moment, Benjamin Hassan conceded 1 set while Jesper De Jong hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Talking about their workload, De Jong and Hassan have played the same amount of sets 9. However, De Jong played 19 games less than Hassan. The Dutch scored 107 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Benjamin blasted 107 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | De Jong | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 17 | 23 |
| Avg per match | 4.3 | 5.8 |
| 1st in | 133/224 | 136/261 |
| %1st in | 59% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 107/133 | 107/136 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 50/91 | 79/125 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 63% |
De Jong bagged 17 aces (4.3 per match). Hassan scored 23 aces (5.8 per match). De Jong won 80% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Hassan won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | De Jong | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 14 | 14 |
| Converted | 14/37 | 14/24 |
| % Converted | 38% | 58% |
| Conceded | 12 | 16 |
| Saved | 9 | 11 |
| % Saved | 75% | 69% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 5 |
De Jong broke his opponents 14 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Dutch surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. The Lebanese broke his opponents 14 times with a 58% conversion rate. Benjamin conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded.
| De Jong | ||||||
| R1 Rodriguez Taverna |
R2 Broom |
1/4 Kasnikowski |
1/2 Ymer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-3 ret. | 6-4 6-4 | 6-0 6-2 | 7-67 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 20 | 14 | 20 | 70 | |
| pts | 65-48 | 73-65 | 58-30 | 73-61 | 269-204 | |
| Total points | 113 | 138 | 88 | 134 | 473 | |
| Winners | 23 | 29 | 21 | 34 | 107 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 40% | 36% | 47% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 2 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 24/45 | 44/73 | 23/34 | 42/72 | 133/224 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 60% | 68% | 58% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 23/24 | 29/44 | 21/23 | 34/42 | 107/133 | |
| % 1st pts | 96% | 66% | 91% | 81% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 16/29 | 7/11 | 13/30 | 50/91 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 55% | 64% | 43% | 55% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 14 | |
| Converted | 2/12 | 4/10 | 5/9 | 3/6 | 14/37 | |
| Converted % | 17% | 40% | 56% | 50% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 12 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 8/10 | 0/0 | 1/2 | 9 | |
| Saved % | – | 80% | – | 50% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| Hassan | ||||||
| R1 Pawelski |
R2 Vesely |
1/4 Copil |
1/2 Yevseyev |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-0 | 4-6 7-65 7-65 | 7-5 6-1 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 36 | 19 | 20 | 89 | |
| pts | 59-29 | 107-105 | 64-43 | 69-60 | 299-237 | |
| Total points | 88 | 212 | 107 | 129 | 536 | |
| Winners | 18 | 36 | 24 | 29 | 107 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 34% | 38% | 42% | 36% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 4 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 21/34 | 46/104 | 29/53 | 40/70 | 136/261 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 44% | 55% | 57% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 18/21 | 36/46 | 24/29 | 29/40 | 107/136 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 78% | 83% | 73% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/13 | 35/58 | 18/24 | 16/30 | 79/125 | |
| % 2nd pts | 77% | 60% | 75% | 53% | 63% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 3/4 | 3/4 | 3/4 | 14/24 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 75% | 75% | 75% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 16 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/6 | 2/2 | 7/8 | 11 | |
| Saved % | – | 33% | 100% | 88% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LL
LWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Jesper De JongDe Jong (1-0) – H2H and prediction
